UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  þ

Filed by a party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨
Filed by the Registrant   þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   o
Check the appropriate box:

oPreliminary Proxy Statement

¨oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þþDefinitive Proxy Statement

¨oDefinitive Additional Materials

¨oSoliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

The TJX Companies, Inc.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

þ
þNo fee required.

¨oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:


 2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 5)Total fee paid:

¨
oFee paid previously with preliminary materials.

¨
oCheck box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 1)Amount Previously Paid:


 2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 3)Filing Party:

 4)Date Filed:


LOGO


(TJX LOGO)
770 Cochituate Road

Framingham, Massachusetts 01701

April 27, 2009

2012

Dear Stockholder:

We cordially invite you to attend our 20092012 Annual Meeting on Tuesday,Wednesday, June 2, 2009,13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. (local time), to be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts. Please enter through the Northeast Entrance.

The proxy statement accompanying this letter describes the business we will consider at the meeting. Your vote is important regardless of the number of shares you own. Please read the proxy statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internet and telephone voting are attached to your proxy card. If you prefer, you can vote by mail by completing and signing your proxy card and returning it in the enclosed envelope.

We hope that you will be able to join us on June 2nd.

13th.

Sincerely,

LOGO

 
Sincerely,    
-s- Bernard Cammarata-s- Carol MeyrowitzLOGO
Bernard Cammarata
Carol Meyrowitz
Chairman of the Board Carol Meyrowitz
President and Chief Executive Officer

Printed on Recycled Paper


Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Independence

Board Nominees and Service

Board Committees and Meetings

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Codes of Conduct and Ethics and Other Policies

Communications with the Board

Transactions with Related Persons

Audit Committee Report

Beneficial Ownership

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Committee Report

Summary Compensation Table

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2012

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2012 Year End

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested during Fiscal 2012

Pension Benefits

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

DIRECTORS COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 2 RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PROPOSAL  3 APPROVAL OF MATERIAL TERMS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE GOALS UNDER CASH INCENTIVE PLANS

PROPOSAL 4 ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

OTHER MATTERS


The TJX Companies, Inc.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 2, 200913, 2012

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. will be held at our offices, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts, on Tuesday,Wednesday, June 2, 2009,13, 2012, at 11:00 a.m. (local time) to vote on:

Election of directors

Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm

• Election of directors.
• Approval of amendments to and performance terms of our Stock Incentive Plan.
• Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm.
• Any other business properly brought before the meeting.

Approval of the material terms of executive officer performance goals under our cash incentive plans

Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation (the “say-on-pay vote”)

Any other business properly brought before the meeting

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 13, 200916, 2012 are entitled to notice of, and entitled to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any adjournments.

adjournments or postponements thereof.

To attend the Annual Meeting, you must demonstrate that you were a TJX stockholder as ofat the close of business on April 13, 200916, 2012 or hold a valid proxy for the Annual Meeting from such a stockholder. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, trustee or nominee, you will need to bring proof of your beneficial ownership as of April 13, 2009,16, 2012, such as a brokerage account statement showing your ownership on that date or similar evidence of such ownership. All stockholders will need to have their photographs takencheck in upon arrival and receive visitor badges for building security. Please allow additional time for these procedures.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Ann McCauley

Secretary

Framingham, Massachusetts

April 27, 2009

2012

PLEASE VOTE ON THE INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE OR BY MAIL


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
PROPOSAL2:APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO AND PERFORMANCE TERMS OFTHE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
PROPOSAL3:RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS
OTHER MATTERS
Appendix A


The TJX Companies, Inc.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 2, 200913, 2012

PROXY STATEMENT

The Board of Directors of The TJX Companies, Inc., or TJX, is soliciting your proxy for the 20092012 Annual Meeting. A majority of the shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting is required for a quorum for the meeting.

You may vote on the Internet, using the procedures and instructions described on the proxy card and other enclosures. You may vote by telephone using the toll-free telephone number on the proxy card. BothThe process for Internet and telephone voting provideincludes easy-to-follow instructions and have proceduresis designed to authenticate your identity and permit you to confirm that your voting instructions are accurate.accurately reflected. Street name holders (who hold their shares through a third party, like a bank or broker) may vote by Internet or telephone if their bankbanks or broker makesbrokers make those methods available, in which case the bankbanks or brokerbrokers will enclose the relevant instructions with the proxy statement. All stockholders of record may vote by signing and returning the enclosed proxy card.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the annual meeting by voting later by telephone or Internet, returning a later-dated proxy card, or delivering a written revocation to the Secretary of TJX.

 Our address is 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 13, 200916, 2012 are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each of the 413,278,040741,678,724 shares of common stock outstanding on the record date is entitled to one vote.

This proxy statement, the proxy card and the Annual Report andForm 10-Kto Stockholders for our fiscal year ended January 31, 200928, 2012 (fiscal 2012) are being first mailed to stockholders on or about the date of the notice of meeting. Our address is 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.

meeting, April 27, 2012.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting To Be Held on June 2, 2009:13, 2012: This proxy statement and Annual Report andForm 10-K for our fiscal year ended January 31, 20092012 are available athttp://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/tjx.


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

We seek nominees who have established strong professional reputations, sophistication and experience in the retail and consumer industries. We also seek nominees with experience in substantive areas that are important to our business such as international operations and growth; marketing and brand management; sales, buying and distribution; accounting, finance and capital structure; strategic planning and leadership of complex organizations; human resources and development practices; and strategy and innovation. Our nominees hold or have held senior executive positions in large, complex organizations or in businesses related to important substantive areas, and in these positions have also gained experience in core management skills and substantive areas relevant to our business. Our nominees also have experience working with or serving on boards of directors and board committees of other public companies, and each of our nominees has an understanding of corporate governance practices and trends. In addition, most of our nominees have significant prior service on our Board, which has provided them with significant exposure to both our business and the industry in which we compete. We believe that all our nominees possess the professional and personal qualifications necessary for board service, and we have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each director in the individual biographies below.

The individuals listed below have been nominated and are standing for election at this year’s Annual Meeting. If elected, they will hold office until our 20102013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. AllOther than Mr. Abdalla, who was elected by the Board in January 2012, all of our current directors were elected to the Board by our stockholders. We do not anticipate that any nominee will become unavailable to serve.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as directors.

director.

Zein Abdalla, 53

Director since 2012

Mr. Abdalla has been CEO of PepsiCo Europe, a division of PepsiCo, Inc., a leading global food, snack and beverage company, since November 2009, prior to which he served as President, PepsiCo Europe Region starting in January 2006. Mr. Abdalla previously held a variety of senior positions at PepsiCo since he joined that company in 1995, including as General Manager of PepsiCo’s European Beverage Business, General Manager of Tropicana Europe and Franchise Vice President for Pakistan and the Gulf region. Mr. Abdalla’s executive experience with a large global company has given him expertise in corporate management, including in emerging markets, operations, brand management, distribution and global strategy.

José B. Alvarez, 4549

Director since 2007

Mr. Alvarez has been a member of the faculty of the Harvard Business School since February 2009. From 2001 through 2008, Mr. Alvarez was an executive with Ahold, NV, a Dutch supermarket retail company, and Stop &Shop/Giant-Landover, its U.S. subsidiary. From August 2008 through December 2008, Mr. Alvarez was the Global Executive Vice President for Business Development for Ahold. PriorAhold, a global supermarket retail company. From 2001 to this appointment, Mr. Alvarez wasAugust 2008, he held various executive positions with Stop & Shop/Giant-Landover, Ahold’s U.S. subsidiary, including President and Chief Executive Officer of Stop &Shop/Giant-Landover beginning in April 2006. Mr. Alvarez also served as from 2006 to 2008 and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Logistics from 2004 to 2006, Senior Vice President, Logistics from 2002 to 20042006. Previously, he served in executive positions at Shaw’s Supermarkets, Inc. and Vice President, Strategic Initiatives prior to 2002. Mr. Alvarez began his career in supermarket retail management at the Jewel Food Stores subsidiary of American Stores Company in 1990. Mr. Alvarez is also a director of United Rentals, Inc.

and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. Mr. Alvarez’s long career in retail has given him broad experience in large retail chain management, including store management, supply chain, logistics, distribution and strategy.

Alan M. Bennett, 5861

Director since 2007

Mr. Bennett served as Interimthe Chief Executive Officer of H&R Block Inc., a tax services provider, from July 2010 to May 2011 and was previously Interim Chief Executive Officer from November 2007 through August 2008. He

was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and a Member of the Office of the Chairman of Aetna, Inc., a diversified healthcare benefits company, from 2001 to April 2007, and previously held other senior financial management positions at Aetna after joining in 1995. Mr. Bennett held various senior management roles in finance and sales/marketing at Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation, formerly Armstrong Rubber Company, from 1981 to 1995 and began his career with Ernst & Ernst (now Ernst & Young LLP). Mr. Bennett is also a director of Halliburton Company and H&R Block Inc.

David A. Brandon, 56
Director since 2001
Mr. Brandon has been the Chairman, Chief Executive OfficerFluor Corporation and was a director of Domino’s Pizza,H&R Block from 2008 to 2011 and Bausch & Lomb, Inc., a pizza delivery company, since 1999. from 2004 to 2007. Mr. Brandon was PresidentBennett’s senior leadership roles in two significant financial businesses provide him with executive experience in managing very large businesses and Chief Executive Officer of Valassis, Inc., a provider of marketing productschange management as well as financial expertise including financial management, taxes, accounting, controls, finance and services, from 1989 to 1998 and Chairman of its Board from 1997 to 1998. Mr. Brandon is also a director of Burger King Holdings, Inc. and Kaydon Corporation.
financial reporting.

Bernard Cammarata, 6972

Director since 1989

Mr. Cammarata has been Chairman of the Board of TJX since 1999. Mr. Cammarata served as Acting Chief Executive Officer of TJX from September 2005 to January 2007. He also led TJX and its former TJX subsidiary and T.J. Maxx Division from the organization of the business in 1976 until 2000, including serving as Chief Executive Officer and President of TJX, Chairman and President of TJX’s T.J. Maxx Division and Chairman of The Marmaxx Group.

Group (Marmaxx). As the founder of TJX, Mr. Cammarata has participated in the leadership of TJX’s successful strategy and development from the beginning to its current position as the world’s largest off-price retailer and offers deep expertise in all aspects of TJX’s business, including management, operations, marketing, buying, distribution and financial matters.

David T. Ching, 5659

Director since 2007

Mr. Ching has been Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for Safeway Inc., a food and drug retailer, since 1994. Previously, Mr. Ching was the General Manager for British American Consulting


2


Group, a software and consulting firm focusing on the distribution and retail industry. He also worked for Lucky Stores Inc., a subsidiary of the American Stores CompaniesCompany from 1979 to 1993, and wasincluding serving as the Senior Vice President of Information SystemsSystems. Mr. Ching was a director of Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. from 2005 to 2007. Mr. Ching’s strong technological experience and related management positions in the last five years of his tenure.
retail industry provide Mr. Ching expertise including information systems, information security and controls, technology implementation and operation, reporting and distribution in the retail industry.

Michael F. Hines, 5356

Director since 2007

Mr. Hines served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., a sporting goods retailer, from 1995 to March 2007. From 1990 to 1995, he held management positions with Staples, Inc., an office products retailer, most recently as Vice President, Finance. Mr. Hines spent 12 years in public accounting, the last eight years with the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Mr. Hines is also a director of GNC Holdings, Inc. and Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and was a director of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. from 2003 to 2007. Mr. Hines’ experience as a financial executive and certified public accountant provides him with expertise in the retail industry including accounting, controls, financial reporting, tax, finance, risk management and financial management.

Amy B. Lane, 5659

Director since 2005

Ms. Lane was a Managing Director and Group Leader of the Global Retailing Investment Banking Group at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., from 1997 until her retirement in 2002. Ms. Lane previously served as a Managing Director at Salomon Brothers, Inc., where she founded and led the retail industry investment banking unit.

Ms. Lane is a director of GNC Holdings, Inc. and was also a director of Borders Group, Inc.

from 1995 to 1999 and from 2001 to 2009. Ms. Lane’s experience as the leader of two investment banking practices covering the global retailing industry has given her substantial experience with financial services, capital markets, finance and accounting, capital structure, acquisitions and divestitures in that industry as well as management, leadership and strategy.

Carol Meyrowitz, 5558

Director since 2006

Ms. Meyrowitz has been Chief Executive Officer of TJX since January 2007, a director since September 2006 and also served as President sincefrom October 2005.2005 to January 2011. She served as Senior Executive Vice President of TJX from 2004 until January 2005, Executive Vice President of TJX from 2001 to 2004 and President of The Marmaxx Group from 2001 to January 2005. From January 2005 until October 2005, she was employed in an advisory role for TJX and consulted for Berkshire Partners LLC, a private equity firm. From 1987 to 2001, she held various senior management positions with The Marmaxx Group and with Chadwick’s of Boston and Hit or Miss, former divisions of TJX. Ms. Meyrowitz is also a director of Amscan Holdings, Inc. and Staples, Inc.

and was a director of The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. from 2004 to 2007. As Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and through the many other positions Ms. Meyrowitz has held with TJX since joining in 1987, Ms. Meyrowitz has a deep understanding of TJX and broad experience in all aspects of off-price retail, including innovation, strategy, buying, distribution, marketing, real estate, finance and accounting, and international operations.

John F. O’Brien, 6669

Director since 1996

Mr. O’Brien is the retired Chief Executive Officer and President of Allmerica Financial Corporation (now known as The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.), an insurance and diversified financial services company, holding those positions from 1995 to 2002. Mr. O’Brien previously held executive positions at Fidelity Investments, an asset management firm, including Group Managing Director of FMR Corporation, Chairman of Institutional Services Company and Chairman of Brokerage Services, Inc. Mr. O’Brien serves as our Lead Director. Mr. O’Brien is also non-executive Chairman and a director of Cabot Corporation, a director of LKQ Corporation and a director of a family of mutual funds35 registered investment companies managed by BlackRock, Inc., an investment management advisory firm.

Robert F. Shapiro, 74
Director since 1974
Mr. ShapiroO’Brien has been the Vice Chairman of Klingenstein, Fields & Co., L.L.C., an investment advisory business, since 1997. Mr. Shapiro was also President of RFS & Associates, Inc., an investmentsubstantial executive experience with two financial services businesses, giving him expertise including general management and consulting firm, from 1988oversight with respect to 2004strategy, financial planning, insurance, operations, finance and was formerly Co-Chairman of Wertheim Schroder & Co. Incorporated and President of Wertheim & Co., Inc., investment banking firms. Mr. Shapiro is also a trustee of The Burnham Fund, Inc. and a director of Genaera Corporation.
capital structure.

Willow B. Shire, 6164

Director since 1995

Ms. Shire has been an executive consultant with Orchard Consulting Group since 1994, specializing in leadership development and strategic problem solving. Previously, she was Chairperson for the Computer


3


Systems Public Policy Project within the National Academy of Science. She also held various positions at Digital Equipment Corporation, a computer hardware manufacturer, for 18 years, including Vice President and Officer, Health Industries Business Unit. Ms. Shire is alsowas a director of Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation.
Corporation from 2007 to 2009. Through her consulting experience and prior business experience, Ms. Shire brings expertise in leadership development, talent assessment, change management, human resources and development practices, cultural assessment and strategic problem solving.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Fletcher H. Wiley, 66

Director since 1990
Mr. WileyIntegrity has been a principalcore tenet of TJX since its inception. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in PRWT Services, Inc.,compliance with all laws and regulations that relate to our businesses. We have Corporate Governance Principles, a technology-oriented products and services firm, since 1996 and served as its Executive Vice President and General Counsel until September 2008. Since 2003, Mr. Wiley has beenGlobal Code of counsel to the law firm Bingham McCutchen LLP. Previously, Mr. Wiley wasConduct for our Associates, a Code of counsel to the law firm Schnader Harrison Goldstein & ManelloEthics for TJX Executives, written charters for each of our Board committees and a partnerDirector Code of the law firms Goldstein & ManelloBusiness Conduct and Fitch, Wiley, Richlin & Tourse, P.C.
Ethics. The current versions of these documents and other items relating to our governance can be found atwww.tjx.com.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Independence.Independence

Independence Determination.    Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that at least two-thirds of the members of our Board will be independent directors. The Board evaluates any relationships of each director and nominee with TJX and makes an affirmative determination whether or not each director and nominee is independent. To assist it in making its independence determination, the Board has adopted categorical standards, which are more rigorous than the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange, and are postedavailable in our Corporate Governance Principles on our website atwww.tjx.com.

As part of the Board’s annual review of director independence, the Board considered the recommendation of our Corporate Governance Committee and reviewed any transactions and relationships between each non-management director or any member of his or her immediate family and TJX. The purpose of this review was to determine whether there were any relationshipsuch relationships or transaction wastransactions and if so, whether they were inconsistent with a determination that the director was independent.

As a result of this review, our Board unanimously determined that teneight directors of our12-member 10-member Board (83.3%(80%) are independent, with the independent directors beingindependent: Zein Abdalla, José B. Alvarez, Alan M. Bennett, David A. Brandon, David T. Ching, Michael F. Hines, Amy B. Lane, John F. O’Brien Robert F. Shapiro,and Willow B. ShireShire. The same determination was made previously with respect to David A. Brandon and Fletcher H. Wiley.Wiley, who each served on the Board until June 2011. Each of these directors met our categorical standards of independence. In addition, the Board considered a business relationship of Mr. Alvarez, a business relationship of Mr. Ching, a charitable relationship of Mr. O’Brien and a business relationship of Mr. Wiley, each of which fell below our categorical standards. Our other two directors are not independent. Bernard Cammarata, is theas Chairman, of TJX, and Carol Meyrowitz, is theas Chief Executive Officer, are employed by TJX.

Board Nominees and President of TJX.

Integrity has been a core tenet of TJX since its inception. We seek to perform with the highest standards of ethical conduct and in compliance with all laws and regulations that relate to our businesses. We have had long-standing Corporate Governance Principles, a Code of Conduct for our associates, a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, written charters for our Board committees and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors. The current versions of these documents and other items relating to our governance can be found atwww.tjx.com.
Service

Board Expertise and Diversity.  Our directors possess a wide range of talents and experience. Our Board reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, diversity and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. All of our directors are financially literate, and three members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts.

Board Annual Performance Reviews.  We have a comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance of our Board and our directors. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the annual performance evaluation of the entire Board, our Chairman, our Lead Director, each of our committees and its chair, and each of our individual directors.
Board Nominees.Nominations.    The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board individuals as director nominees who, in the opinion of the Corporate Governance Committee, have high personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated ability, perspective and judgment and who will be effective, in conjunction


4


with the other nominees to and members of the Board, in collectively serving the long-term best interests of our shareholders. stockholders. In evaluating the suitability of individual Board nominees, the Corporate Governance Committee takes into account many factors, including general understanding of disciplines relevant to the success of a large publicly traded company in today’s business environment, understanding of our business and industry, professional background and leadership experience, experience on the boards of other large publicly traded companies, personal accomplishment, independence and geographic, gender, age, ethnic and racial diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of our business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience. In addition, the Corporate Governance Committee considers, in light of our business, each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that are identified in the biographical information contained under “Election of Directors.”

The Corporate Governance Committee’s process for identifying and evaluating candidates, including candidates recommended by shareholders,stockholders, includes actively seeking to identify qualified individuals by various means which may include reviewing lists of possible candidates, such as chief executive officers of public companies or leaders of finance or other industries,industries; considering proposals from sources, such as the Board of Directors, management, employees, shareholdersAssociates, stockholders and industry contacts,contacts; and engaging an outsidea third-party search firm to expand our search and assist in compiling information about possible candidates. During fiscal 2012, Mr. Abdalla was recommended to the Corporate Governance Committee by a third-party search firm.

The Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a policy with respect to submission by shareholdersstockholders of candidates for director nominees which is available on our website atwww.tjx.com. Any shareholderstockholder may submit in writing one candidate for consideration for each shareholderstockholder meeting at which directors are to be elected by not later than the 120th calendar day before the first anniversary of the date that we released our proxy statement to shareholdersstockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. Recommendations should be sent to the Secretary of TJX,c/o Office of the Secretary of The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. A recommendation must include specified information about, and consents and agreements of, the candidate.candidate, as described in the policy. The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates candidates for the position of director recommended by shareholdersstockholders or others in the same manner.manner as candidates from other sources. The Corporate Governance Committee will determine whether to interview any candidates and may seek additional information about candidates from third-party sources.

Board Expertise and Diversity.    We seek to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender and ethnicity/race, but we do not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. We also seek to have a Board that reflects a range of talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. All of our directors are financially literate, and two members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts.

Majority Voting.Voting.    Our by-laws provide for the election of directors in an uncontested election by a majority of the shares properly cast at the meeting. Our Corporate Governance Principles, available atwww.tjx.com, require any nominee for director to provide the Secretary of the Company an irrevocable contingent resignation at or prior to the distribution of proxy solicitation materials for the meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. Such resignation will beelection, effective only if such director fails to receive the requisite majority vote in an uncontested election, as provided in the by-laws, and the Board accepts such resignation. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide procedures for the consideration of such resignation by the Board. Within 90 days of the date of the annual meeting of shareholders,stockholders, the Board, with the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, will act upon such resignation. In making its decision, the Board will consider the best interests of TJX and its shareholders,stockholders, and take what it deems to be appropriate action. Such action may include accepting or rejecting the resignation or taking further measures to address those concerns that were the basis for the underlying shareholderstockholder vote.

Chairman; Lead Director.Policies Relating to Board Service.    Our Board annually electsIt is our policy that no director shall be nominated who has attained the Chairmanage of 75 prior to or on the Boarddate of Directors. Because our Chairman, Mr. Cammarata, is not an independent director, consistent withhis or her election. Under our Corporate Governance Principles, directors who are CEOs of public companies should not serve on more than two boards of public companies besides their own and no director should serve on more than five boards of public companies. Under our independent directors have elected John F. O’Brien as Lead Director. In this role, among other duties, Mr. O’Brien meets at least quarterly with our Chief Executive Officer and with senior officers as necessary, attends quarterly management business review meetings, schedules meetingsAudit Committee Charter, members of the independent directors, presides at meetingsAudit Committee should not serve on more than two audit committees of other companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenure as a director, our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the director is required to tender his or her resignation from the Board, at which the Chairman is not present, including meetings of the independent directors and of the non-management directors, serves as a liaison between the independent directors and the ChairmanCorporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board any action to be taken with respect to the resignation.

Board Committees and Company management, approves meeting schedules and agendas, attends the meetings of each Meetings

Board committee and undertakes other responsibilities designated by the independent directors.

Attendance.Attendance.    During fiscal 2009,2012, our Board met 1510 times. Each directorof our directors attended at least 75% of all meetings of the Board and committees of which he or she was then a member. At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the independent directors met separately. It is our policy, included in our Corporate Governance Principles, that all nominees and directors standing for re-electionelection are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All nine of our nominees and directors who were then serving on our Board attended the 20082011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Board Committees.Meeting.

The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance. Each committee’s charter is available on our website atwww.tjx.com.

All members of the Audit, Corporate Governance, FinanceExecutive Compensation and Executive CompensationFinance Committees are independent directors. While each committee has designated responsibilities, the committees act on behalf of the entire Board. The committees regularly report on their activities to the entire Board.


5


The table below provides information about membership and meetings of these committees during fiscal 2009:
                     
     Corporate
     Executive
    
Name**
 Audit  Governance  Executive  Compensation  Finance 
 
José B. Alvarez  X           X     
Alan M. Bennett      X           X 
David A. Brandon              X*  X 
Bernard Cammarata          X*        
David T. Ching  X   X             
Michael F. Hines  X*              X 
Amy B. Lane  X               X*
Carol Meyrowitz                    
John F. O’Brien          X   X     
Robert F. Shapiro  X   X   X         
Willow B. Shire      X*      X     
Fletcher H. Wiley  X   X             
Number of meetings during fiscal 2009  14   5   1   9   4 
2012:

Name

  Audit  Corporate
Governance
  Executive  Executive
Compensation
  Finance 

José B. Alvarez

   X      X   

Alan M. Bennett

    X     X  X  

David A. Brandon**

      X  X  

Bernard Cammarata

     X  

David T. Ching

   X    X     

Michael F. Hines

   X     X  

Amy B. Lane

   X     X     X

Carol Meyrowitz

      

John F. O’Brien

     X    X   

Willow B. Shire

    X   X   

Fletcher H. Wiley**

   X    X     
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Number of meetings during fiscal 2012

   11    3    0    7    4  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

*Chair. Mr. Bennett replaced Mr. Brandon as Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee in June 2011.

**On June 3, 2008, Mr. Alvarez became a member of the Audit Committee, Mr. BennettBrandon and Mr. Ching became members of the Corporate Governance Committee, and Mr. Hines became Chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Shapiro, Chair of the Audit Committee untilWiley did not stand for election in June 3, 2008, continued as a member of the Audit Committee.2011.

Audit Committee.    The Audit Committee is responsible for the annual appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm and oversight of the financial reporting process. Each member of the Audit Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Audit Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

reviewing with management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;

monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;

• reviewing with management, internal auditors and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements, including the accounting principles and procedures applied in their preparation and any changes in accounting policies;
• monitoring our system of internal financial controls and accounting practices;
• overseeing the internal and external audit process, including the scope and implementation of the annual audit;
• overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;
• selecting or terminating the independent registered public accounting firm, approving their compensation and evaluating the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the lead audit and reviewing partners;
• establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting or auditing matters;
• pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and
• reviewing other matters as the Board deems appropriate.

overseeing the internal and external audit process, including the scope and implementation of the annual audit;

overseeing our compliance and ethics programs;

selecting or terminating the independent registered public accounting firm, approving their compensation and evaluating the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the lead audit and reviewing partners;

establishing and maintaining procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints, including the confidential and anonymous submission of complaints by employees, regarding accounting or auditing matters;

pre-approving all work by the independent registered public accounting firm; and

reviewing other matters as the Board deems appropriate.

Executive Compensation Committee.    The Executive Compensation Committee, or the ECC, is responsible for overseeing executive compensation and benefits. Each member of the ECC is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange


6


listing standards. The ECC operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the

committee annually.

Pursuant to its charter, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee or to such other person that the ECC determines is appropriate and is permitted by law. Specifically, the ECC’s responsibilities include:

approving the compensation, including awards of stock options, bonuses and other awards and incentives, of our executive officers and other Associates in such categories as are from time to time identified by the ECC;

determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including awards of stock options, bonuses and other awards and incentives, based on the evaluation by the Corporate Governance Committee of the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and such other factors as the Committee deems relevant;

• approving the compensation, including awards of stock options, bonuses and other incentives, of our executive officers and all other employees in such categories as are from time to time identified by the Committee;
• determining the performance targets and performance criteria under our incentive plans;
• approving the terms of employment of our executive officers; and
• administering our incentive plans.

determining the performance goals and performance criteria under our incentive plans;

approving the terms of employment of our executive officers;

reviewing other matters that the Board or the ECC deems appropriate, such as our succession plan for the CEO and other executive officers; and

overseeing the administration of our incentive plans.

The ECC also reviewed our compensation policies and practices for our Associates to confirm that they do not give rise to risks which are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Corporate Governance Committee.    The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending nominees for directors to the Board and for our corporate governance practices. Each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is a non-employee director and meets the independence standards adopted by the Board in compliance with New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Corporate Governance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

recommending director nominees to the Board;

developing and reviewing corporate governance principles;

• recommending director nominees to the Board;
• developing and reviewing corporate governance principles;
• reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors, including retirement policies, the size of the Board and the meeting frequency of the Board, and reviewing the functions, duties and composition of the committees of the Board;
• recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, the Chairman, the Lead Director and each committee and its chair;
• establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and
• overseeing the maintenance and presentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

reviewing our policies with respect to corporate public responsibility, including charitable and political contributions and political advocacy;

reviewing practices and policies with respect to directors, including retirement policies, the size of the Board and the meeting frequency of the Board, and reviewing the functions, duties and composition of the committees of the Board and compensation for committee members;

recommending processes for the annual evaluations of the performance of the Board, the Chairman, the Lead Director and each committee and its chair;

establishing performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and annually evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer against such objectives; and

overseeing the maintenance and presentation to the Board of management’s plans for succession to senior management positions.

Executive Committee.    The Executive Committee meets at such times as it determines to be appropriate and has the authority to act for the Board on specified matters during the intervals between meetings of the Board.

Finance Committee.    The Finance Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board relating to our financial activities and condition. The Finance Committee operates under the terms of a written charter which is reviewed by the members of the committee annually. Specifically, the Finance Committee’s responsibilities include:

• 

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board with respect to our financing plans and strategies, financial condition, capital structure, tax strategies, liabilities and payments, dividends, stock repurchase programs and insurance programs;

• approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies and capital investment criteria, and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and
• reviewing investment policies, performance and actuarial status of our pension and other retirement benefit plans.
Policies Relating to Directors.  It isthe Board with respect to our policy that no director shall be nominated whofinancing plans and strategies, financial condition, capital structure, tax strategies, liabilities and payments, dividends, stock repurchase programs and insurance programs;

approving our cash investment policies, foreign exchange risk management policies and capital investment criteria and agreements for borrowing by us and our subsidiaries from banks and other financial institutions; and

reviewing investment policies, performance and actuarial status of our pension and other retirement benefit plans.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Board Leadership Structure.    Our Board annually elects a Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board has attainedchosen to separate the ageroles of 75 prior to or on the date of his or her election or re-election. UnderChairman and Chief Executive Officer. Consistent with our Corporate Governance Principles, because our current Chairman, Bernard Cammarata, is not independent, our independent directors have elected a Lead Director, John F. O’Brien. In this role, among other duties, Mr. O’Brien meets at least quarterly with full-time jobs should not serve on more than three boards of public companies in


7


addition toCarol Meyrowitz, our Board; no director should serve on more than four boards of public companies in addition to our Board;Chief Executive Officer, and memberswith other senior officers as necessary, attends regular management business review meetings, schedules meetings of the Audit Committee shouldindependent directors, presides at meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not serve on more than two audit committeespresent, including meetings of other companies. When a director’s principal occupation or business association changes during his or her tenurethe independent directors, serves as a director,liaison between the independent directors and the Chairman and Company management, approves meeting schedules and agendas, attends the meetings of each Board committee and undertakes other responsibilities designated by the independent directors. The Board believes that the separate roles of Mr. Cammarata, Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. O’Brien are in the best interests of TJX and its stockholders. Mr. Cammarata has wide-ranging, in-depth knowledge of our business arising from his many years of service to TJX and, as a result, provides effective leadership for the Board and support for Ms. Meyrowitz and other management. The structure permits Ms. Meyrowitz to devote her attention to leading TJX and focus on the execution of its business strategy. Mr. O’Brien provides independence in TJX’s Board leadership as provided in the Corporate Governance Principles providethrough his review and approval of meeting agendas, his participation in management business review meetings and his leadership of the independent directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.    It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to TJX. The Board has oversight responsibility for the directorsystems established to report and monitor the most significant risks applicable to TJX. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports to the Board at Board meetings. The Board reviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi-year plans, any major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to the Company’s operations, plans, prospects or reputation, acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning and receives regular reports from our Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk. The Audit Committee reviews risks associated with financial and accounting matters, including financial reporting, accounting, disclosure, internal controls over financial reporting, ethics and compliance programs, compliance with orders and data security. The ECC reviews risks related to executive compensation and the design of compensation programs, plans and arrangements. The Corporate Governance Committee deals with risks related to board and CEO evaluations and management succession. The Finance Committee is requiredresponsible for risks related to tender his or her resignation fromfinancing, investment, capital structure, liquidity, and investment performance, asset allocation strategies and funding of our benefit plans.

Compensation Program Risk Assessment.    As part of our regular enterprise risk assessment process overseen by the Board and described above, we review the Corporate Governance Committee will recommendrisks associated with our compensation plans and arrangements. In fiscal 2012, the ECC reviewed TJX’s employee compensation policies and practices and determined that they do not give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The ECC’s assessment considered (a) what risks could be created or encouraged by our executive and broad-based compensation plans and arrangements worldwide, (b) how those potential risks are monitored, mitigated and managed and (c) whether those potential risks are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on TJX. The assessment was led by our Chief Compliance Officer and Director of Enterprise Risk, whose responsibilitiesinclude leadership of our enterprise risk management process, and included consultation with and input by, among others, executive officers, senior human resources and financial executives, the ECC’s independent compensation consultant and internal and external legal counsel. This process included:

a review of our compensation programs and practices, including our historical compensation practices;

analysis of programs or program features and practices that could potentially encourage excessive or unreasonable risk-taking of a material nature;

a review of business risks that these program features could potentially encourage;

identification of factors that mitigate risks to the business and incentives for executives to take excessive risk, including, among others, a review of compensation design and elements of the compensation programs, the balance among these program elements, role of compensation consultants and other advisors, authority and discretion of the Board, any actionthe ECC and other Board committees in compensation, controls and procedures, program and cultural elements and potential for individual or group influences; and

consideration of the balance of potential risks and rewards related to be taken with respect to the resignation.our compensation programs and its role in implementation of our corporate strategy.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics and Other Policies

Global Code of Conduct.Conduct for Associates.    We have a Global Code of Conduct for our associatesAssociates designed to ensure that our business is conducted with integrity. Our Global Code of Conduct covers professional conduct, including employment policies, ethical business dealings, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, intellectual property rights and the protection of confidential information, as well as adherence to laws and regulations applicable to the conduct of our business. Information concerning ourWe have a Code of Conduct ishelpline to allow Associates to voice their concerns. We also have procedures for Associates to report complaints regarding accounting and auditing matters. Information about the helpline and procedures are available on our website atwww.tjx.com.www.tjx.com

.

Code of Ethics for TJX Executives and Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors..    We have a Code of Ethics for TJX Executives governing our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, Vice Chairman, Chief Administrative Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and other senior operating, financial and legal executives. The Code of Ethics for TJX Executives is designed to ensure integrity in our financial reports and public disclosures. We also have a Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors which promotes honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. Both of these codes of conduct are published on our website atwww.tjx.com.We intend to disclose any future amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for TJX Executives or the Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors within four business days of the waiver or amendment through a website posting or by filing a Current Report onForm 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.

Stock Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines for Directors and Executives.    Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that at the time of his or her election, a director must ownis expected to acquire initially at least $10,000 of our common stock. Over time, a director must increase his or her stock ownershipoutright and to hold shares of our common stock (or their equivalent) equal to at least $200,000 (including awards under the Deferred Stock Program for Non-Employee Directors under our Stock Incentive Plan). Our Stock Ownership Guidelines included in our Corporate Governance Principles provide that our Chief Executive Officer and President will attain stock ownership with a fair market value ofequal to at least five times his or herthe annual retainer paid to the directors within five years of initial election to the Board. Our Chief Executive Officer is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times annual base compensation and our Vice ChairmanPresident, our Chief Financial Officer and each Senior Executive Vice President willis expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value of at least three times his or her annual base compensation. ForSuch ownership guidelines for our executive officers such ownership guidelines are reduced by 50% at age 62. Executives are expected to make steady progress toward these ownership guidelines and to attain them within five years from their respective dates of hire as or promotion to the above positions. It is expected that individualsexecutives who have not yet achieved the stock ownership levels provided by these guidelines will make steady progress towards meeting such levels and will retain 50% of their shares (on an after-tax basis) resulting from the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted and deferred stock or vestingstock.

Board Annual Performance Reviews.    We have a comprehensive review process for evaluating the performance of performance-based restricted stock. Once an executive satisfiesour Board and sustainsour directors. Our Corporate Governance Committee oversees the target stock ownership level,annual performance evaluation of the executiveentire Board, our Chairman, our Lead Director, each of our committees and its chair, and each of our individual directors.

Sustainability.    As part of our continued commitment to corporate responsibility, TJX has long pursued solutions to sustainability challenges that are good for the environment as well as the Company’s profitability.

We continue to be committed to environmentally sound business practices throughout our operations, including energy and water conservation as well as recycling and waste reduction. We have discussed our efforts with stockholder groups over the years and understand the importance to our business, stockholders, Associates, customers and communities of strong, sustainable business practices. Our corporate social responsibility report, which highlights efforts we have made in these initiatives, is permitted to sell all future shares obtained through option exercises, the vestingavailable on our websiteat www.tjx.com.

Online Availability of deferred stock or the vestingInformation.    The current versions of performance-based restricted stock.

our Corporate Governance Principles, Global Associate Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Director Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committees are available on our website atwww.tjx.com.

Communications with Directors.the Board

Security holders and other interested parties may communicate directly with the Board, the non-management directors or the independent directors as a group, specified individual directors or the Lead Director by writing to such individual or groupc/o Office of the Secretary, The TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701. The Secretary will forward such communications to the relevant group or individual at or prior to the next meeting of the Board.

Requests for Information.  Shareholders may request print copies of our Corporate Governance Principles, Code of Conduct for Associates, Code of Ethics for TJX Executives, Code of Business Conduct Stockholders and Ethics for Directors, and charters for our Audit, Corporate Governance, Executive, Executive Compensation and Finance Committeesothers can communicate complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters by writing to the Office of the Secretary at the above address.Audit Committee, c/o Vice President, Corporate Internal Audit Director, The current versions of these documents are also available on our website atwww.tjx.com.


8

TJX Companies, Inc., 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701.


Transactions with Related Persons

Under the Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, the Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction in which TJX and any of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, 5% shareholdersstockholders and their immediate family members are participantsis a participant and in which such persons haveperson has a direct or indirect material interest as provided under SEC rules. In the course of reviewing potential related person transactions, the Corporate Governance Committee considers the nature of the related person’s interest in the transaction; the presence of standard prices, rates or charges or terms otherwise consistent with arms-length dealings with unrelated third parties; the materiality of the transaction to each party; the reasons for TJX entering into the transaction with the related person; the potential effect of the transaction on the status of a director as an independent, outside or disinterested director or committee member; and any other factors the Committee may deem relevant. Our General Counsel’s office is primarily responsible for the implementation of processes and procedures for screening potential transactions and providing information to the Corporate Governance Committee.

In April 2012, we acquired two office buildings in Marlborough, Massachusetts intended to be used as part of our corporate headquarters for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $62.5 million from affiliates of FMR LLC, which, with its related funds, beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding stock. We employ Charles Barios, the brother-in-law of our CEO, as a Manager of Technical Services. He received compensation from us consistent with other Associates at his level and with his responsibilities that totaled approximately $145,436 for fiscal 2012, including salary and incentive compensation, and he participates in company benefit plans generally available to Associates. Our Corporate Governance Committee discussed and approved these transactions, consistent with our review process described above.

Audit Committee Report

We operate in accordance with a written charter adopted by the Board and reviewed annually by the Committee. We are responsible for overseeing the quality and integrity of TJX’s accounting, auditing and financial reporting practices. The Audit Committee is composed solely of members who are independent, as defined by the New York Stock Exchange and TJX’s Corporate Governance Principles. Further, the Board has determined that threetwo of our members (Mr. Hines and Ms. Lane and Mr. Shapiro)Lane) are audit committee financial experts as defined by the rules of the SEC.

The Audit Committee met 1411 times during fiscal 2009,2012, including four meetings held with TJX’s Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Controller, Corporate Internal Audit and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, (PwC),or PwC, TJX’s independent registered public accounting firm, prior to the public release of TJX’s quarterly and annual earnings announcements in order to discuss the financial information contained in the announcements.

We took numerous actions to discharge our oversight responsibility with respect to the audit process. We received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC pursuant to Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) concerning any relationships between PwC and the CompanyTJX and the potential effects of any disclosed relationships on PwC’s independence and discussed with PwC its independence. We discussed with management, the internal auditors and PwC, TJX’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. We reviewed with both PwC and our internal auditors their audit plans, audit scope and identification of audit risks.

We discussed and reviewed with PwC communications required by the Standards of the PCAOB (United States), as described in PCAOB AU Section 380, “Communication with Audit Committees,” and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of PwC’s examination of TJX’s financial statements. We also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.

examinations with and without management present.

The aggregate fees that TJX paid for professional services rendered by PwC for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 were:

In thousands

  2012   2011 

Audit

  $4,967    $4,377  

Audit Related

   295     415  

Tax

   318     488  

All Other

   22     12  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $5,602    $5,292  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, assistance with review of documents filed with the SEC, and opinions on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting with respect to fiscal years ended January 31, 20092012 and January 26, 2008 were:

         
In thousands
 2009  2008 
 
Audit $3,710  $3,404 
Audit Related  330   541 
Tax  525   505 
All Other  15    
         
Total $4,580  $4,450 
• Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of TJX’s consolidated financial statements including financial statement schedules and statutory and subsidiary audits, assistance with


9fiscal 2011.


Audit related fees were for services related to consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit plan and medical claims audits.

Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.

review of documents filed with the SEC, and opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting with respect to fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2009 and expanded testing in connection with the computer intrusion(s) with respect to fiscal 2008.

All other fees were for services related to training for TJX’s internal audit department in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011.

• Audit related fees were for services related to consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and employee benefit plan audits.
• Tax fees were for services related to tax compliance, planning and advice, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax services for employee benefit plans, and requests for rulings and technical advice from tax authorities.
• All other fees were for services related to ethics training for TJX’s internal audit department.

We pre-approve all audit services and all permitted non-audit services by PwC, including engagement fees and terms. We have delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chair, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Our policies prohibit TJX from engaging PwC to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information system design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions orcontribution-in-kind reports, actuarial

services, internal audit outsourcing, any management function, legal services or expert services not related to the audit, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. In addition, we evaluate whether TJX’s use of PwC for permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining PwC’s independence. We concluded that PwC’s provision of non-audit services, which we approved in advance, was compatible with their independence.

We reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of TJX as of and for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20092012 with management and PwC. Management has the responsibility for the preparation of TJX’s financial statements, and PwC has the responsibility for the audit of those statements.

Based on these reviews and discussions with management and PwC, we recommended to the Board that TJX’s audited financial statements be included in its Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 20092012 for filing with the SEC. We also have selected PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2010,2013, subject to ratification by TJX’s shareholders.

stockholders.

Audit Committee

Michael F. Hines,Chair

José B. Alvarez

David T. Ching

Amy B. Lane
Robert F. Shapiro
Fletcher H. Wiley


10


Beneficial Ownership

The following table shows, as of April 13, 200916, 2012, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by each director, each director nominee, each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and all directors and executive officers as a group:

         
     Percentage of
 
  Number of
  Outstanding
 
Name
 Shares(1)(2)  Common Stock 
 
José B. Alvarez  350   * 
Arnold S. Barron  277,131   * 
Alan M. Bennett  2,000   * 
David A. Brandon  7,000   * 
Bernard Cammarata(3)(4)  1,610,847   * 
Donald G. Campbell(4)  693,600   * 
David T. Ching  1,000   * 
Ernie L. Herrman  411,847   * 
Michael F. Hines  1,800   * 
Amy B. Lane  11,135   * 
Carol Meyrowitz  588,716   * 
Jeffrey G. Naylor  480,337   * 
John F. O’Brien  89,779   * 
Robert F. Shapiro  15,000   * 
Willow B. Shire  75,999   * 
Nirmal K. Tripathy  15,000   * 
Fletcher H. Wiley  50,000   * 
All Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (19 persons)  4,701,102   1.1%
group. All share and share-based numbers in this proxy statement reflect the two-for-one stock split effected February 2, 2012.

Name

Less than 1%.Number of
Shares(1)
 

Zein Abdalla

1,654

José B. Alvarez

28,827

Alan M. Bennett

32,127

Bernard Cammarata(2)(3)

3,048,994

David T. Ching

32,088

Ernie L. Herrman

683,180

Michael F. Hines

40,294

Amy B. Lane(3)

55,093

Carol Meyrowitz

565,208

Jeffrey G. Naylor

156,062

John F. O’Brien

124,208

Jerome Rossi

154,270

Willow B. Shire

134,656

Paul Sweetenham

0

All Directors, Nominees and Executive Officers as a Group (18 Persons)(4)

5,559,579

The total number of shares beneficially owned by each individual and by the group above each constitutes less than 1% of the outstanding shares. Reflects sole voting and investment power except as indicated in footnotes below.

(1)Reflects sole voting and investment power except as indicated below.

Includes shares of common stock which each ofthat the following persons had the right to acquire on April 13, 200916, 2012 or within sixty (60) days thereafter through the exercise of options: Mr. Barron (235,000),Herrman, 215,408; Ms. Lane, 12,912; Ms. Meyrowitz, 185,288; Mr. Cammarata (450,000),O’Brien, 24,000; Mr. Campbell (558,134),Rossi, 29,148; Ms. Shire, 72,000 and all directors,

nominees and executive officers as a group, 657,848. Includes performance-based restricted shares that are subject to forfeiture restrictions: Mr. Herrman, (315,000), Ms. Lane (7,956),420,000; Ms. Meyrowitz, (125,000),240,000; Mr. Naylor, (362,500),110,000; Mr. O’Brien (68,000), Ms. Shire (68,000), Mr. Tripathy (10,000) and Mr. Wiley (36,000)Rossi, 96,000 and all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group, (2,525,717). Excludes1,197,500. Includes vested deferred shares payable in(and estimated deferred shares upon leavingfor accumulated dividends) held by the Board:following directors: Mr. Abdalla, 677; Mr. Alvarez, (4,086),25,581; Mr. Bennett, (4,086), Mr. Brandon (14,273),25,581; Mr. Ching, (5,118),18,880; Mr. Hines, (5,118),27,748; Ms. Lane, (8,697),28,079; Mr. O’Brien, (17,773), Mr. Shapiro (27,031),45,442; Ms. Shire, (16,296), and Mr. Wiley (26,503).
(2)Includes shares that are subject to forfeiture restrictions: Mr. Herrman (74,064), Ms. Meyrowitz (300,000), Mr. Naylor (69,064),45,616 and all directors, nominees and executive officers as a group, (518,166).217,604. Includes estimated deferred shares (and estimated deferred shares for accumulated dividends) that vest within 60 days of April 16, 2012 held by the following directors: Mr. Abdalla, 677; Mr. Alvarez, 2,546; Mr. Bennett, 2,546; Mr. Ching, 2,546; Mr. Hines, 2,546; Ms. Lane, 2,546; Mr. O’Brien, 2,546; Ms. Shire, 2,546 and all directors, nominees, and executive officers as a group, 18,499.

(3)(2)Excludes 1,6083,216 shares owned by Mr. Cammarata’s wife as to which Mr. Cammarata disclaims beneficial ownership and includes 200,725 shares owned by trust of which Mr. Cammarata is sole trustee.ownership.

(4)(3)Includes shares owned by trusts or a charitable foundation of which the individualfollowing is a trustee or officer: Mr. Cammarata, (108,347)3,048,994 and Mr. Campbell (10,000).Ms. Lane, 1,300.


11

(4)Includes 16,000 shares owned jointly and over which an executive officer and spouse share voting and dispositive power.


AsThe following table shows, as of April 13, 2009 based on information filed with the SEC, persons16, 2012, each person known toby us to beneficially ownbe the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stockstock:

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

  Number of
Shares
   Percentage of
Class
Outstanding
 

FMR LLC

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, MA 02109

   95,850,314     12.71

The amounts above are based on ownership of FMR LLC at December 31, 2011, as follows:

         
     Percentage of
 
  Number of
  Class
 
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Shares  Outstanding 
 
FMR LLC
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109
  24,897,461(1)  6.02%
PRIMECAP Management Company
225 South Lake Avenue #400
Pasadena, CA 91101
  22,220,999(2)  5.38%
Barclays Global Investors, N.A
400 Howard Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
  21,593,439(3)  5.22%
(1)Reflects sole voting power with respect to 2,066,481 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares.
(2)Reflects sole voting power with respect to 2,228,624 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares.
(3)Reflects sole voting power with respect to 18,727,654 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares. Reflects shares beneficially owned by Barclays Global Investors, N.A. and affiliated entities Barclays Global Fund Advisors, Barclays Global Investors, LTD, Barclays Global Investors Japan Limited, Barclays Global Investors Canada Limited, Barclays Global Investors Australia Limited and Barclays Global Investors (Deutschland) AG.
indicated in its Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2012, which reflected sole voting power with respect to 5,289,370 of the shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 95,850,314 shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of holdings and transactions in our common stock with the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange. To facilitate compliance, we have undertaken the responsibility to prepare and file these reports on behalf of our officers and directors. Based on our records and other information, all reports were timely filed, except that in April 2008, Mr. Tripathy filed a Form 4 relating to the withholding of shares in connection with the vesting of restricted stock one day late. The failure to report this transaction was inadvertent and was corrected promptly upon discovery.


12filed.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based on these reviews

Executive Summary

Over the last 10 years, our management has led TJX’s excellent performance through weak and discussions, we recommendedstrong economies, more than doubling sales and earnings. We believe our compensation program has been a key component to the Board that the Compensation Discussionachieving this success and Analysis be included in this proxy statementis critical to motivating our management to achieve our business goals, encouraging long-term strategy, rewarding them for performance and in the Annual Report onForm 10-Kretaining them. The fiscal 2012 compensation of our named executive officers reflects our strong performance for the fiscal year.

Our Performance

Fiscal 2012 was another successful year ended January 31, 2009.for TJX.

Our fiscal 2012 net sales reached $23.2 billion, a 6% increase over last year.

Executive Compensation Committee
David A. Brandon, Chair
José B. Alvarez
John F. O’Brien
Willow B. Shire
Compensation Discussion

Our U.S. businesses continued to exceed our expectations in fiscal 2012, posting significant comparable store sales increases on top of significant increases in the prior two years and Analysis

continuing to increase their segment profits. Our compensation program is based oninternational businesses regained their momentum by the end of fiscal 2012.

Our total stockholder return for fiscal 2012 was 43%.

Our performance continued to reflect strong execution by our philosophy that all of our associates are important to our success, with our executive officers and senior executives setting the directionmanagement of our business model.

For the third consecutive fiscal year, we increased customer traffic.

We delivered another year of double digit earnings growth, with a 14% increase in adjusted earnings per share* in fiscal 2012, on top of 23% and having overall responsibility for driving48% increases in the prior two years.

Our three- and five-year growth through fiscal 2012 surpassed that of our results. We have achieved significant success in our business over many years. But, like other retailers, we operate in a highly-competitive and challenging economic environment. Accordingly, we have adopted a total compensation approach weighted toward performance-based incentive compensationpeer group.

Our market capitalization continued to accomplish several goals:grow.

Compound Annual Adjusted EPS* Growth Rates  attract and retain very talented individuals,TJX Market Capitalization FY08 - FY12
LOGOLOGO

*

All share and share-based numbers in this proxy statement reflect the two-for-one stock split effected February 2, 2012. Adjusted earnings per share of TJX and several of the peer group members discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis exclude from diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (EPS) computed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) the positive and negative effects of items that affect comparability between periods. TJX fiscal 2007 adjusted EPS of $0.83 excludes costs of $0.01 per share related to the Computer Intrusion from GAAP EPS of $0.82. TJX fiscal 2008 adjusted EPS of $0.97 excludes a $0.13 per share charge for a provision for Computer Intrusion related costs from GAAP EPS of $0.84. TJX fiscal 2009 adjusted EPS of $0.96 excludes a $0.04 per share benefit from the 53rd week, $0.01 per share benefit from tax adjustments and $0.02 per share benefit for a reduction in

 • reward achievementComputer Intrusion related costs from GAAP EPS of our financial goals,$1.04. TJX fiscal 2011 adjusted EPS of $1.75 excludes $0.11 per share for A.J. Wright closing costs and a $0.01 per share benefit for a reduction in Computer Intrusion related costs from GAAP EPS of $1.65. TJX fiscal 2012 adjusted EPS of $1.99 excludes $0.04 per share for A.J. Wright closing costs and $0.02 per share from costs related to the conversion and grand re-opening of certain former A.J. Wright stores to other banners from GAAP EPS of $1.93. These measures may not foot due to rounding. TJX GAAP EPS for fiscal 2010 was not adjusted.
• enhance shareholder value by achieving

As a result of our performance-based compensation program, our executives’ fiscal 2012 compensation reflects our outstanding performance.

We exceeded our corporate pre-tax income-based target for fiscal 2012 under our short-term cash incentive plan, resulting in a 117.95% payout of corporate short-term award opportunities for our named executive officers.

Our performance for the cumulative fiscal 2010-2012 period substantially exceeded the business plan-based targets for that three year period under our long-term cash incentive plan and resulted in a 138.70% payout of award opportunities for our named executive officers.

We satisfied all of the performance-based vesting conditions ending in fiscal 2012 for performance-based restricted stock awards held by our named executive officers.

Our stock price rose to $33.69 at fiscal year-end (on a post-split basis), a 41% increase over last fiscal year end.

Our CEO’s earned compensation over the last five fiscal years is correlated with our strong performance:

LOGO

*Total compensation consists of base salary, short- and long-term financial objectives.cash incentives earned, stock options valued at grant date and performance-based restricted stock valued at grant date and allocated to the year of the related service and performance (see “Allocation of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards to Years of Intended Compensation” below). Reconciliations of adjusted EPS to GAAP EPS are included above.
The Executive

Our Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors implements this compensation philosophy by providingProgram

We have a total compensation packageapproach focused on performance-based incentive compensation that seeks to:

attract and retain very talented individuals in the highly competitive retail environment, maintaining an extremely high talent level in our company and providing for succession broadly across our management;

reward objective achievement of the short- and long-term financial objectives reflected in our business plans; and

enhance shareholder value by directly aligning the interests of our management and shareholders.

Our compensation program for our executives is heavily weighted to incentive compensation that is competitive with our peers butat risk. Base salary is weighted toward performance-based incentive compensation. Thethe only one of the four principal elements of our compensation program that is fixed. Each of the other elements is variable: short- and long-term cash incentive plan awards are earned solely on the achievement of objective performance goals, vesting of performance-based restricted stock requires achievement of objective performance goals, and stock options have value only to the extent the value of our stock increases. As shown in the following charts, performance-based compensation (equity incentives, short-term cash incentives and long-term cash incentives) constituted a significant portion of our named executive officers’ (NEOs) direct annual compensation include:

at target in fiscal 2012.

Fiscal 2012 Compensation Elements*

  base salaries,

LOGO

*• Consists of fiscal 2012 salary, target cash incentive awards under short-term cash incentives based on achievement of one-year adjusted pre-tax income targets,
• longer-term cash incentives based on achievement of adjusted pre-tax income targets over multi-year periods,
• (MIP) and long-term (LRPIP) plans, performance-based restricted stock awards (grant date fair value) with performance periods ending in fiscal 2012 and stock options, and
• retirement benefits and limited perquisites.fiscal 2012 option awards (grant date fair value).

Elements of Compensation Philosophy

For many years, our

Incentive compensation philosophy for our key associates, including our named executive officers, has reflected pay for performance. Total compensation for our executives is a combination of base salary, short-term and long-term cash incentives, and long-term equity-based incentives. We design our compensation so thatcomprises a substantial portion of each executive’snamed executive officer’s compensation opportunity is equity-based and cash incentive compensation. Theopportunity. These incentives directly tie the amount of each named executive officer’s incentive compensation is directly tied to objective performance achieved by TJX and is thereforeits stock and thereby directly linkedlink executive compensation with the interests of shareholders.

our stockholders. The key elements of our compensation program are shown below:

Element The amounts paid under our short and long-term cash incentive plans are determined on the basis of achievement of predetermined adjusted pre-tax income targets. Once the targets are set, we do not make


13


ObjectivesForm
 discretionary adjustments to the targets for our named executive officers nor do we make discretionary upward adjustments to the bonuses they earn as a result of the level of the targets achieved.

Salary

Attract and retain talented individuals.Cash
 • All restricted stock grants to our named executive officers are subject to performance measures as well as service requirements and, as a result, vest only if predetermined performance targets are achieved.
 
  Stock options have realizable value onlyProvide compensation for performance of primary roles and responsibilities.

Short-Term Cash

Incentives (MIP)

Reward achievement of financial goals for the current fiscal year, either for a single division or for a blend of divisional goals.Cash
Provide an incentive to achieve our short-term financial objectives and balance our long-term performance goals.

Long-Term Cash

Incentives (LRPIP)

Reward achievement of multi-year financial goals, typically over three fiscal years, weighted and aggregated to reflect the extent thatgoals of each division.Cash
Provide an incentive to achieve our long-term financial objectives and balance our short-term performance goals.
Provide an additional retention incentive.

Equity Incentives

(Options and PBRS)

Align the valueinterests of our stock increases.executives with shareholders.Equity
Provide an important retention incentive.

Health, Retirement

and Other Benefits

Provide health and welfare, deferred compensation and retirement benefits, as well as limited perquisites, to maintain our competitive position and promote retention.Insurance/Cash

Our incentive compensation program is consistent and transparent to our Associates.    The targets that must be achieved to earn incentive awards and performance-based restricted stock are clear, objective and directly reflect our targeted operating performance. The incentive compensation targets for all of our divisions are derived from our Board-approved business plans, which, in turn, form the basis for our corporate incentive targets.

Our compensation program aligns the interests of our Associates, our businesses and our stockholders and is designed to drive outstanding performance.    The incentive plan targets are derived from our business plans, focusing all of our executives and other key Associates on the same objectives. For our short-term cash incentive plan, the ECC selected an annual operating profit goal measure based on pre-tax income. Annual performance for divisional level Associates is measured based on targets taken from the divisional business plans and annual performance for our executives and other corporate Associates is measured against an aggregation of those divisional targets. For our long-term cash incentive plan, the ECC selected an operating goal and approved a

target that is the weighted aggregation of multi-year divisional profit targets, designed to measure results over the long term. The weighting and aggregation of the long term divisional goals, based on adjusted pre-tax income measures, adds focus on performance division by division and encourages growth and performance of the smaller divisions. The business plans that underlie our incentive targets also are the basis for the projections of performance that we give to investors at the beginning of each fiscal year. As a result, our incentive targets across the company drive the performance that we need to achieve our projections and align the interests of our Associates and those of our stockholders.

We believe that our approach to compensation serves to align management’s interests with those of shareholders and has contributed to our strong overall performance over many years in all types of business environments. As of the end of fiscal 2012, our total stockholder return significantly exceeded the performance of the general market (S&P 500) and our industry index (Dow Jones U.S. Apparel Retailers Index) over the past three- and five-year fiscal periods.

TJX Total Shareholder Return Growth v. Market and Retail Indexes

LOGO

We maintain shareholder friendly pay practices.

Our named executive officers receive limited perquisites, all of which are shown and quantified in the Summary Compensation Table.

Our short- and long-term bonuses are earned by our executives based solely on achievement of objective Board-approved metrics. The bonus payouts for our named executive officers can be decreased but not increased under our bonus plans and are subject to limits on maximum payout.

All of our restricted stock awards have performance-based vesting conditions in addition to time-based vesting conditions. None of these awards vest based on time alone.

We do not provide tax gross-ups on regular compensation or golden parachute tax gross-ups. Severance benefits are payable to our named executive officers following a change of control only upon involuntary terminations of employment or termination by the executive for “good reason.”

We have not offered a primary Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) benefit to new participants for many years. Only vested participants still have this benefit.

Our executive officers are subject to and are in compliance with published stock ownership guidelines.

Our stockholders showed strong approval for our executive compensation program.    At our last annual meeting, 97% of our stockholders voting on the proposal approved our advisory “say on pay” proposal on the compensation of our executive officers. The ECC views these results as demonstrating stockholders’ support for our approach to executive compensation, including the focus on incentive components linked to our performance, and was mindful of this support when acting on compensation matters during the remainder of fiscal 2012 and in considering compensation for fiscal 2013.

How Compensation Decisions Are Made

The Executive Compensation Committee (ECC), an independent committee of our Board of Directors, is responsible for compensation design and for approving compensation for our executive officers. The ECC has the authority, without Board or management approval, to retain and terminate its compensation consultants and to determine their fees and terms of engagement. The ECC reviews and approves compensation matters at various meetings during the year.

The ECC has used the same principle of compensation design for many years: establish a program of total compensation competitive with our peers, heavily weighted toward objective, performance-based incentives. In determining totalthe overall level of executive compensation and the allocation of its components, the ECC considers various factors, such as company and divisional performance, individual performance and responsibility, market data, retention and succession planning.

The ECC reviews our overall corporate and divisional performance as well as the individual performance of the executives, including both quantitative and qualitative performance factors. In setting targets and evaluating performance, the ECC reviews various metrics of corporate performance, including adjusted EPS. Our named executive officers play a limited role in the executive compensation process. Our named executive officers participate in our strategic planning process and recommend to the Board for its review and approval the annual and multi-year business plans for TJX and its divisions. These approved plans are the basis for the short- and long-term incentive performance targets and the restricted stock performance criteria, all of which are approved by the ECC. Additionally, our CEO provides an annual self-assessment and annual performance reviews of the other named executive officers and makes recommendations to the ECC regarding the base salaries and other elements of compensation for those executives. The Corporate Governance Committee of the Board provides the ECC with a review of the performance of our CEO for the year, including her achievement of performance objectives set by the Corporate Governance Committee in addition to those provided in our incentive plans, but does not make compensation recommendations. The ECC then considers these performance reviews and recommendations in establishing base salaries, cash incentive opportunities and equity grants.

The ECC also consults with and reviews data from a compensation consultant to assess the overall competitiveness of our executives’ individual compensation and our compensation programs overall. For fiscal 2012 compensation, as discussed below under “ECC Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Information,” the ECC reviewed peer group data provided by Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (PM&P), its independent compensation consultant, with respect to the named executive officers. The ECC also receives advice from PM&P on other matters, such as contracts with executives and plan targets.

The ECC considers the effects on retention and succession at the executive officer and other management levels when determining the levels and design of compensation. The ECC takes into account individual performance, contractual obligations, historical compensation practices that inbelieved successful and the ECC’s estimation have proven successful for TJX, compensation practices at peer group companies, compensation programs for TJX as a whole and any special considerationslimitation on income tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)). The ECC also considers matters such as recruitment, new hires, promotions, organizational changes, relocations and transitional roles. In addition

The ECC uses all of this information to base salarydetermine the overall level and appropriate mix of short-term versus long-term incentive opportunities and cash versus equity-based compensation and opportunities to provide a competitive mix and encourage achievement of our executive officers receiveshort- and long-range goals and also encourage employee retention and succession. The ECC separately determines individual compensation components at its various meetings throughout the year. The ECC also uses this information to determine the appropriate level of retirement benefits, deferred compensation opportunities and limited perquisites. The availability of these benefits helpsThese help us maintain our competitive position in the market for executive talent but does not form part of the basis for the ECC’s determination of an executive officer’s total compensation for any year.

and retain our executives.

ECC Compensation Consultant and BenchmarkingPeer Group Information

The ECC is advised by Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., or Cook, anengaged PM&P to serve as the independent compensation consultant engaged by and reporting to the ECC. Cook does not perform any servicesECC for TJX other than its work for the ECC. In general, Cook advisesfiscal 2012. PM&P advised the ECC with respect to the design and competitive positioning of base salary, annual bonus and long-term cash and equity incentives for senior management, including our named executive officers.

The ECC generally benchmarks total compensation of our named executive officers and eachother senior management, including

terms of employment agreements. PM&P did not perform any services for TJX other than work for the elementsECC and for the Corporate Governance Committee with respect to compensation of that compensation againstdirectors. PM&P reported to the ECC, which determined the scope of PM&P’s engagement and fees.

The ECC uses a group of 12 peer companies that are large, publicly traded retailers selected by the ECC. The peer group included Circuit City Stores, Inc., Dillard’s, Inc., Macy’s, Inc., The Gap, Inc., Kohl’s Corporation, Limited Brands, Inc., Nike, Inc., OfficeMax Incorporated, J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Staples, Inc. and Target Corporation. Substantially the same peer group has been used over a number of years, andto provide context for its compensation decision-making for our named executive officers. Each year, the ECC considers revisions each year to reflect changes in the peer group and TJX within fiscal 2011 it substantially revised the advicepeer group. In June 2011, advised by PM&P, the ECC reviewed the composition of its peer group, including considerations of the ECC’s compensation consultantfollowing pre-determined criteria:

industry similarity;

companies with revenues approximately one-third to three times our annual revenue (generally between $7B and $65B at that time);

companies with market capitalization approximately one-fourth to four times our management. market capitalization (generally between $5B and $74B at that time); and

similar levels of complexity in terms of global operations and brand and/or product line diversity.

The ECC determined that the following peer group of 17 large, publicly traded consumer-oriented companies used in fiscal 2011 continued to be an appropriate peer group for TJX for fiscal 2012:

Fiscal 2012 Peer Group Companies

Amazon.com, Inc.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Nordstrom, Inc.
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.

Kohl’s Corporation

Ross Stores, Inc.
Best Buy Co., Inc.

Limited Brands, Inc.

Staples, Inc.
Costco Wholesale Corporation

Lowe’s Companies, Inc.

Target Corporation
The Gap, Inc.Macy’s, Inc.YUM! Brands, Inc.
J. C. Penney Company, Inc.Nike, Inc.

Although the ECC uses peer group data to provide context for its own determinations, it does not calibratetarget compensation or any element of compensation for our named executive officers withby reference to any specified level at the peer group.

Total Compensation Design

In determining the overall level and components of executive compensation, the ECC focuses on total compensation weighted toward performance-based incentive compensation. Generally, the ECC conducts a strategic review of the compensation policies

Compensation for all management employees of TJX and its divisions, including the named executive officers. Using the comparative benchmarking data provided by the Hay Group, TJX’s compensation consultant, and in the case of our named executive officers the ECC’sincludes base salary, incentive compensation consultant, the ECC assesses the overall competitiveness(both equity and cash) and other benefits, each of our compensation programs. For each management level, the ECC then assesses the appropriate mix of short-term versus long-term incentives and cash versus equity-based compensation to provide a competitive mix and at the same time encourage long-range goals and employee retention.which is described further below. The ECC then separately reviewsevaluates and determines individualbalances the portion of total compensation components, including base salary, short-term and long-term cash incentive awards and equity grants, at its various meetings throughout the year described below.

payable as each element of compensation rather than applying a set formula.

Base Salary

Each of our named executive officers receives a base salary in cash during the fiscal year. Base salary levels are determinedcontributes to our overall compensation approach by providing competitive, fixed compensation to attract and retain talented individuals at a level that reflects the ECC taking into account Companyexecutive’s responsibilities, performance, contractual obligations, individual performanceexperience and responsibilities, past base salary, the limitation on income tax deductions imposed by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), peer group data, the advice of Cook and recommendations by the supervising executive officers. The performance review of the Chief Executive Officer is performed each year by the Corporate Governance Committee as provided in its


14


charter. The review includes both quantitative and qualitative factors, including the Chief Executive Officer’s achievement of performance objectives for the year set by the Corporate Governance Committee in addition to those providedvalue in the Management Incentive Planmarketplace. Base salaries are reviewed on an annual basis and also at the Long Range Performance Incentive Plan. The Corporate Governance Committee does not make compensation recommendations. The executive to whomtime of a named executive officer reports undertakes the performance review and makes salary recommendations to the ECC for such officer. In June 2008, Ms. Meyrowitz did so for Mr. Campbell, Mr. Barron and Mr. Herrman, Mr. Campbell did so for Mr. Naylor, and Mr. Naylor did so for Mr. Tripathy. Base salary increases for our named executive officers, other than increases as a result of mid-fiscal year promotions or contractual obligations, are generally implemented effective in June each year.
In April 2008, effective as of the beginning of fiscal 2009, the ECC increased Ms. Meyrowitz’s base salary and in June 2008, the ECC increased the base salaries of Mr. Campbell, Mr. Barron, Mr. Naylor, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Tripathy as part of its annual performance appraisal. In September 2008, pursuant to the terms of hisnew employment agreement, Mr. Campbell’s base salary was reduced when the ECC approved a reductionpromotion, or other significant changes in the level of his services.
responsibilities.

Incentive Compensation

General.

A significant portion of each named executive officer’s compensation is equity-basedequity and cash incentive compensation granted under awards requiring an increase in the value of our stock or achievement of performance goals, at levels specified by the ECC, based on performance measures approved by our stockholders.

• Our cash incentive plans compensate named executive officers and other key associates based on achievement of adjusted pre-tax income goals for one and for multiple years consistent with our announced financial plans and on continued service. In this way, these incentive plans motivate these executives and key associates to achieve our targeted corporate performance in the short and long term while at the same time promoting retention.
• The equity-based awards to our named executive officers are made under a stockholder-approved plan and in fiscal 2009 consisted of stock options and performance-based restricted stock. Stock options are subject to service-based vesting requirements and deliver value only if the market price of our stock increases. Vesting of the performance-based restricted stock awards depends on meeting both performance conditions and service requirements.
Our equity-based and cash incentive compensation for our U.S. named executive officers in fiscal 20092012 was intended to qualify for an exemption from the deduction limitation rules of Section 162(m) of the Code.
The ECC does not apply a formula in determining the portion of total compensation payable in the form of cash incentive compensation or equity-based compensation. However, starting in fiscal 2006, based on input from our shareholders and a review of our equity grant practices, the ECC reallocated compensation, reducing the number of stock options granted and increasing long-term cash incentive opportunities.
.

Short-Term Cash Incentives.Incentives (MIP)  Our.    The annual cash incentive awards are made under our Management Incentive Plan or MIP. The strategic purpose of our MIP is(MIP) are designed to motivate our named executive officers and other key associatesAssociates to achieve or exceed a performance target established for the annual targets for each of our divisions.fiscal year. Each MIP award has performance targets anda target award opportunity based on achievement of this target. The actual payout of a MIP awards are paid in cash in an amountaward is determined by measurement of actual performance against performance targets. If performance meets the performance targets,target. If the targeted performance is met, participants are eligible to receive their target MIP awards. If performance exceeds the performance targets,target, participants are eligible to be paid more than their target MIP awards based on the extent to which performance exceeds the performance targets (but under the terms of the MIP, not more than two times the target award, and not more than a pre-established maximum, of $5 million per award under current plan terms, for officersany participant whose compensation is expected to be subject to the limits on deductibility under Code Section 162(m)). If performance does not meet the performance targets, thetarget, participants are paid no MIP awards or are paid awardseligible to receive a payout below their MIP target awards, based on the extent to which performance falls below the performance targets.

The annualtargets; or, if performance does not meet a minimum threshold, no award is earned. MIP performance target for executive officers and other corporate associates for fiscal 2009 was an aggregationtargets (including any objective factors that may affect financial results, the occurrence of weighted pre-tax income, excluding capitalized inventory costs, certain corporate allocations and results of T.K. Maxxwhich would result in Germany and HomeSense in the U.K. and including intercompany


15


interest income/expense, for our divisions (“adjusted pre-tax income”). Marmaxx was underweighted relative to its expected contribution to adjusted corporate pre-tax income in order to make performance at the smaller divisions more meaningfulautomatic adjustments to the incentivetargets), award opportunities and thereby promote focus on their performance. Foramounts payable at different levels of performance are pre-established by the portion of fiscal 2009 during which Mr. Herrman was President of Marmaxx, like other Marmaxx divisional associates, his MIP performance target was based solely on Marmaxx’s performance.
The MIP performance target for each division for fiscal 2009 was derived from our plans for the divisionECC for the fiscal year approved by our Board and reflected performance by our divisions necessary for TJX to achieve corporate performance within the range publicly projected in the beginning of fiscal 2009 as well as the adjusted pre-tax income needed from each division to generate the return on invested capital and earnings per share for TJX publicly projected at that time. Because these MIP performance targets reflected our plans for our divisions for fiscal 2009, we believed when we set them that they were challenging but reasonably achievable.
Divisional performance at the actual divisional MIP performance targetyear. Performance results in payment of the divisional portion of a corporate MIP award at the target level. If a division performs above or below its target performance, that divisional portion of the corporate award is adjusted in accordance with a predetermined percentage, or slope, adjustment. (Due to its lower profitability, the ECC established predetermined step, rather than slope, adjustments for above or below-target performance by A.J. Wright for fiscal 2009.) The adjustments included a minimum level of divisional performance required for payment of the corresponding portion of the corporate MIP award and a maximum level of divisional performance beyond which such portion would not be increased. These limits reflected our belief that divisional performance below the minimum level should not merit any award and that the maximum level of performance represented the appropriate “reach” level for the division. For fiscal 2009, the minimum performance level for each division (except A.J. Wright) ranged from 70% to 80% of the performance targets, and the maximum performance level ranged from 114% to 130% of the performance targets. The divisional portions of the corporate award are then aggregated for the corporate MIP award. Our MIP requires that performancemust be certified by the ECC, before any payments can be madewhich has the authority to reduce but not increase the MIP awards to our named executive officers.
The MIP award opportunities (as a percentage of base salary) for our named executive officers for fiscal 2009 were: Ms. Meyrowitz, 100% target, 200% maximum; Mr. Barron, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, 55% target, 110% maximum; and Mr. Tripathy, 45% target, 90% maximum. As with other aspects of compensation, the ECC generally reviews short-term cash compensation as part of its overall review of compensation of our named executive officers and establishes MIP target award levels based on responsibilities, peer group data and input from the ECC’s compensation consultant.
Our named executive officers other than Mr. Herrman earned fiscal 2009 MIP awards of 72.89% of their respective target awards. These awards were calculated as follows:
                 
  Adjusted Pre-Tax
        Weighted
 
  Income
     % Above
  Contribution to
 
Fiscal 2009
 Performance
  Actual Adjusted
  or Below
  Corporate
 
Division (Figures in 000’s)
 Target  Pre-Tax Income  Target  MIP Target Award 
 
Marmaxx $1,448,412  $1,361,044   −6.03%  45.40% 
Canada C$290,596  C$276,888   −4.70%  7.64% 
HomeGoods $95,898  $38,517   −59.84%  0.00% 
Europe £89,843  £104,787   16.63%  15.54% 
A.J. Wright $1,002  $(244)  NA   4.31% 
                 
          Total Corporate MIP Award: 72.89%
Because his responsibilities changed during the fiscal year, Mr. Herrman’s fiscal 2009 award was prorated between the Marmaxx divisional award and the corporate award based on the time he served in the divisional and corporate roles during the year.

Long-Term Cash Incentives.Incentives (LRPIP)  Our.    The long-term cash incentive awards are made under our Long Range Performance Incentive Plan or LRPIP. The strategic purpose of our LRPIP is(LRPIP) are designed to motivate our named executive


16


officers and other key associatesAssociates to achieve or exceed cumulative performance targets for a multi-year targeted adjusted pre-tax income levels for eachperiod, which also promotes retention. Each LRPIP award has a target award opportunity based on achievement of our divisions. Likethese targets. As with the MIP, the payout of LRPIP awards are paid in cash in an amountis determined by measurement of actual performance against the pre-established performance targets. If cumulativethe targeted performance meets the performance targets set by the ECC,is met, participants are eligible to receive their target LRPIP awards. If cumulative performance exceeds the performance targets, participants are eligible to be paid more than their target LRPIP awards based on the extent to which performance exceeds the performance targets (but under the terms of the LRPIP, not more than 150% of the target award, subject toand not more than a pre-established maximum, of $5 million per award under current plan terms, for those officersany participant whose compensation is expected to be subject to the limits on deductibility under Code Section 162(m)). If performance does not meet the performance targets, the participants are paid no LRPIP awards or awardseligible to receive a payout below their LRPIP target LRPIP awards, based on the extent to which performance falls below the performance targets. For the LRPIPtargets, or, if performance does not meet a minimum threshold, no award opportunities for fiscal2009-2011 granted in fiscal 2009, the minimum three-year performance level for an award was set at 33.33% of the performance targets and the level for maximum awards was set at 133.33% of the performance targets.
Theis earned. LRPIP performance targets (including any objective factors, the occurrence of which would result in automatic adjustments to the targets), award opportunities and amounts payable at different levels of performance are a cumulative aggregation of adjusted pre-tax incomepre-established by the ECC for our divisions for a multi-fiscal year period (generally three fiscal years). Likeeach performance cycle. Performance results must be certified by the MIP targets,ECC, which has the authority to reduce but not increase the LRPIP performance targets for awards made for fiscal2009-2011 were derived from our plans for each of our divisions for the fiscal years approved by our Board and reflected performance by our divisions necessary for TJX to achieve corporate performance within the range publicly projected in the beginning of the fiscal year as well as the adjusted pre-tax income needed from each division to generate the return on invested capital and earnings per share for TJX publicly projected at that time. Because these performance targets reflected our plans for our divisions, we believed when we set them that they were challenging but reasonably achievable.
Payouts under the LRPIP for all awards are calculated in a similar manner to payouts under the corporate MIP except that performance is measured on a cumulative basis over the multi-year period of the award. The award earned with respect to cumulative performance of each division for the multi-year period above or below target performance is determined by applying pre-determined slope adjustments. Amounts earned with respect to each division are aggregated for the corporate LRPIP award. Under our LRPIP, the ECC must certify performance for a performance period before any payments can be made to named executive officers.
In April 2008, the ECC granted LRPIP awards for fiscal2009-2011 to each participant in the LRPIP. The LRPIP award opportunities for our named executive officers for fiscalofficers.

2009-2011 were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,400,000 target, $2,100,000 maximum; Mr. Barron, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, $700,000 target, $1,050,000 maximum; and Mr. Tripathy, $300,000 target, $450,000 maximum. The ECC generally reviews long-term and short-term cash compensation together as part of its overall review of compensation of our named executive officers and establishes LRPIP award levels by position, based on responsibilities, peer group data and input from the ECC’s compensation consultant.

Our named executive officers other than Mr. Tripathy earned fiscal2007-2009 LRPIPEquity-Based Compensation.    Equity awards of 105.69% of their respective target awards. These awards were calculated as follows:
                 
  Cumulative
  Cumulative
       
  3-Year Adjusted
  3-Year
  % Above
  Weighted
 
Fiscal 2007-2009
 Pre-Tax Income
  Actual Adjusted
  or Below
  Contribution to
 
Division (Figures in 000’s)
 Performance Target  Pre-Tax Income  Target  LRPIP Target Award 
 
Marmaxx $3,837,089  $3,942,706   2.75%  67.68% 
Canada C$644,370  C$762,610   18.35%  12.75% 
HomeGoods $166,046  $168,920   1.73%  10.26% 
Europe £166,875  £238,618   42.99%  15.00% 
A.J. Wright $40,357  $(17,535)  −143.45%  0.00% 
                 
      Total LRPIP Award: 105.69%     
Mr. Tripathy, who joined TJX during the fiscal2007-2009 LRPIP cycle, had a two-year fiscal2008-2009 LRPIP award.
Long-Term Equity-Based Compensation.  Long-term equity-based awardsare made under our Stock Incentive Plan, or SIP, are an important partgenerally in the form of our named executive officers’ total compensation. The ECC generally


17


determines by management level the amount of equity grants and the allocations between stock options and performance-based restricted stock basedawards. The ECC grants each stock option with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on responsibilities, peer group data and input from the ECC’s compensation consultant.date of grant. Stock options do not deliver value unless and only to the extent that the value of our stock appreciates and then only to the extent of such appreciation, thus linking the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. The performance conditions applicable to thestockholders. Performance-based restricted stock awards relate vestingvest only to the extent of achievement of the performance levelscriteria, linked to TJX’s financial performance, provided for those awards. TheBoth stock options and performance-based restricted stock awards also have service-based vesting conditions of both our stock options and our other equity-based awardsthat provide important retention incentives.

Other Elements of Compensation

Retirement Benefits.    All of our U.S. named executive officers participate in a broad-based pension plan for U.S. Associates under which benefits are accrued based on compensation and service. They are also eligible to participate in our 401(k) plan. As a resident of the U.K., Mr. Sweetenham participated in our retirement plan for U.K. Associates under which participants may defer earnings, receive an employer match and invest their funds to purchase benefits at retirement. We also maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Rossi participate in our primary SERP benefit program. Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor participate in our alternative SERP benefit program, each discussed below under “Pension Benefits.”

Deferred Compensation.    Our U.S. named executive officers can defer compensation under our Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, an elective deferred compensation plan, intended to help us compete for and retain talent by providing participants with additional opportunities for personal financial planning and by rewarding and encouraging retention. Amounts deferred are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments. Participants in the ESP (other than those eligible for our primary SERP benefit) receive an employer match, subject to a vesting schedule, that is similarly notionally invested. Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman received this match for fiscal 2012, a portion of which is based on our performance under MIP. Mr. Sweetenham was eligible for a similar performance-based deferred compensation benefit in the U.K., which was forfeited in connection with his departure from TJX. Some of our named executive officers also have amounts previously deferred under our General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, now closed to new deferrals. Under this plan, deferrals are credited to an account that earns notional interest until distributed at an annually adjusted rate based on U.S. Treasury securities. Our deferred compensation plans for named executive officers are discussed below under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.”

Perquisites.    We provide limited perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers. These benefits, which are all included below as part of All Other Compensation detailed in footnote 5 of the Summary Compensation Table, generally consist of automobile allowances, financial and tax planning services, payment of insurance premiums and payment of legal fees associated with employment agreement negotiations. None of these perquisites is grossed up for taxes.

Fiscal 2012 Compensation

Fiscal 2012 Base Salary.    Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Herrman’s salaries were set at the end of fiscal 2011 in connection with their employment agreements and reflected the new roles they assumed in fiscal 2012, including the mutual expectation that Ms. Meyrowitz would retain responsibility for all executive functions associated with her role as Chief Executive Officer but that, with Mr. Herrman taking on the role of President, she would be able to delegate more of her day-to-day responsibilities. During fiscal 2012, the ECC approved salary increases for Mr. Rossi and Mr. Naylor based on various factors including assessment of individual performance, our fiscal 2011 performance, responsibilities, contractual agreements and peer group review. The overall salary earned by each named executive officer during fiscal 2012 is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table. The base salaries for our named executive officers as of the end of fiscal 2012 were as follows:

Name

  Salary 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $1,320,000  

Ernie L. Herrman

  $1,100,000  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

  $830,000  

Jerome Rossi

  $780,000  

Paul Sweetenham

  £525,045  

Fiscal 2012 MIP.    The MIP award opportunities for all of our named executive officers other than Mr. Sweetenham were based solely on our corporate MIP target. Mr. Sweetenham’s award opportunity was based on both corporate and TJX Europe targets. For both optionsfiscal 2012, the target MIP award opportunities (as a percentage of salary earned during the fiscal year) were as follows:

Name

% of Salary

Goals

Carol Meyrowitz

150Corporate

Ernie L. Herrman

80Corporate

Jeffrey G. Naylor

65Corporate

Jerome Rossi

50Corporate

Paul Sweetenham

55

75% TJX Europe;

25% Corporate

For fiscal 2012, the ECC approved MIP performance targets based on Board-approved divisional pre-tax income plans, a metric intended to focus the executives on targets that drive the performance the company needs to achieve its publicly announced performance projections for the fiscal year. For corporate Associates, the MIP performance target was consolidated divisional pre-tax income excluding capitalized inventory costs, and intercompany, imputed, direct and fixture interest income and expense and did not include the former A.J. Wright division. For TJX Europe, the MIP performance target was TJX Europe divisional pre-tax income excluding capitalized inventory costs, and intercompany, imputed, direct and fixture interest income and expense. In setting the targets, the ECC believed that they were challenging but reasonably achievable. The table below shows these performance targets as well as the performance at or below which the award payout is zero and at or above which the award payout is the maximum under the terms of the award.

Fiscal 2012 MIP Targets

(Amounts in 000’s)

   Threshold
(% of  Target)
   Target   Maximum
(% of Target)
 

Corporate

  $

 

2,112,977

(80%)

  

  

  $

 

2,641,221

(100%)

 

  

  $

 

3,018,538

(114.3%)

  

  

TJX Europe

  £

 

78,347

(75%)

  

  

  £

 

104,463

(100%)

  

  

  £

 

125,355

(120%)

  

  

Payout (%)

   0%     100%     200%  

The MIP awards for fiscal 2012 for our named executive officers were earned as follows:

Fiscal 2012 MIP Results

(Amounts in 000’s)

   MIP Target   Actual
Performance
   Amount Above
Target
   % of
Target
  MIP Award  Payout
Percentage
 

Corporate

  $2,641,221    $2,708,956    $67,735     102.6  117.95

TJX Europe

  £104,463    £45,142          43.2  0

Based on these results, the named executive officers earned awards equal to 117.95% of their award opportunities, other than Mr. Sweetenham, who earned a fiscal 2012 MIP award of 29.49% of his target award opportunity (117.95% of 25% of his target award).

Completion of Fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP Award Cycle.    Fiscal 2012 completed the performance cycle for the fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP awards. Our LRPIP award target for our named executive officers was based on our Board-approved business plans for the covered fiscal years at the time of grant to reflect overall company performance objectives and was intended to motivate achievement of long-term business goals. The target was based on an aggregate of weighted cumulative pre-tax income targets for each of our divisions for fiscal years 2010, 2011 and 2012, excluding capitalized inventory costs, but including intercompany, imputed, direct and fixture interest income and expense, and automatically adjusted during fiscal 2011 to exclude the A.J. Wright division. Actual divisional performance for the cycle was compared to each divisional target resulting in divisional payout percentages, based on a pre-established formula (payout ranging from 0% to 150% for performance ranging from 33% to 133% of the divisional performance target). These percentages were then weighted according to pre-established weightings designed to make performance at the smaller divisions more meaningful to the LRPIP award and intended to promote focus on their performance. The resulting weighted divisional percentages were added together to determine the overall award payout percentage. In setting the targets, the ECC believed that they were challenging but reasonably achievable.

For the fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP cycle, our named executive officers’ target award opportunities were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,423,333; Mr. Herrman, Mr. Naylor and Mr. Sweetenham, $700,000; and Mr. Rossi, $375,000. Their actual awards for this cycle, shown in the Summary Compensation Table, were earned on the following basis:

Fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP Results

(Amounts in 000’s)

Divisions

  Cumulative
3-Year
Performance
Target
   Cumulative
3-Year
Actual Performance
   Unweighted
Contribution  to

Target Award
  Divisional
Weightings*
  Weighted
Contribution  to
Target Award
 

In the US:

        

Marmaxx

     $3,708,378       $6,135,242     150.00  68.4  102.63

HomeGoods

     $117,739       $566,526     150.00  10.5  15.79

TJX Canada

  C$670,485    C$1,066,012     150.00  10.5  15.79

TJX Europe

     £321,905       £198,947     42.70  10.5  4.49
        

 

 

 
       Total LRPIP Award: 138.70% 

*Measures may not foot due to rounding.

Grant of Fiscal 2012-2014 LRPIP Award Opportunities.    The ECC established the following LRPIP target award opportunities for the fiscal 2012-2014 cycle for our named executive officers: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,320,000; Mr. Herrman, $1,100,000; Mr. Naylor and Mr. Sweetenham, $700,000; and Mr. Rossi, $375,000. The minimum level for any payout is 33.33% of the performance target and the maximum payout level is 133.33% of the performance target. Consistent with our past disclosure practice, we plan to disclose the performance targets, which are based on business targets for future periods, after the completion of the performance cycle.

Equity-Based Compensation

Grant of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards.    The ECC granted performance-based restricted stock awards in fiscal 2012 to our named executive officers, as shown in the Grant of Plan Based Awards table, other than our CEO and our President, who each were granted restricted stock awards in connection with their new employment agreements at the end of fiscal 2011. The ECC determined the number of shares granted in fiscal 2012 based on factors including the level of responsibility of the executives, the potential value of each grant and the executive’s total compensation. The performance condition for full vesting of these awards is achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the target corporate LRPIP payout for the performance period, linking the vesting with our corporate performance. Performance below this target level reduces the number of shares that would otherwise vest, pro rata, with no shares vesting if performance is below the minimum threshold. Vesting of these performance-based restricted stock awards is also subject to satisfaction of the service requirements specified in the awards. The ECC believes these awards perform an important retention function.

Allocation of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Awards to Years of Intended Compensation.    Under SEC rules, the entire value of our performance-based restricted stock awards is shown in the Summary Compensation Table in the year of grant. As a result, the equity compensation of our named executive officers shown in the Summary Compensation Table for a particular year sometimes reflects awards intended by the ECC valuesto compensate the executives for service and performance in different years. For example, performance-based restricted stock awards for Ms. Meyrowitz reflected in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2011 valued at approximately $5,725,000 (based on the grant date fair value) were intended by the ECC to compensate Ms. Meyrowitz for service and performance in fiscal 2012.

Satisfaction of Performance-Based Vesting Conditions for Restricted Stock Awards.    During fiscal 2012, each named executive officer held performance-based restricted stock awardawards with performance-based vesting criteria that were satisfied based on the closing price of our common stock on the datefiscal 2012 MIP performance or fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP performance.

The fiscal 2012 portion of the award andheld by Ms. Meyrowitz fully vested upon ECC certification of achievement of a fiscal 2012 MIP payout of 117.95% of the corporate MIP target awards (as described under “Fiscal 2012 MIP” above). The performance condition for full vesting was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the corporate MIP target payout, which required us to achieve 93% of the targeted performance reflected in the case of optionfiscal 2012 plan.

The awards uses the Black-Scholes option pricing formula.

For the September 2008 option awards toheld by our other named executive officers and other associates,contained performance-based vesting conditions that were satisfied due to achievement of a payout of 138.70% of the fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP target awards (as described under “Completion of Fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP Award Cycle” above). The performance condition for full vesting of these awards was achievement of a payout of not less than 67% of the fiscal 2010-2012 LRPIP target payout, which, as a result of the weighting of the smaller divisions, required us to achieve 78% of the targeted cumulative performance reflected in the fiscal 2010-2012 plan (assuming that each division performed at the same level against its target performance). These awards remain subject to service-based vesting conditions after fiscal 2012.

Grant of Stock Options in Fiscal 2012.    The ECC determined the number of stock options granted to our named executive officers and other Associates in September 2011 by setting a fixed dollar value by executive and/or position and dividing this value by the stock price on the grant date. All options arewere granted with an exercise price equal to the closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date, and in general, have a maximum term of ten years, vest over three years and, to the extent vested, are exercisable for a limited period following termination of employment.

Related Policies and Considerations

Employment Agreements.The performance-based restricted stock granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2009 had both service-basedECC reviewed and performance-based vesting conditions. Ms. Meyrowitz’s award had a one-year service condition as well as a conditionapproved, after consultation with its independent compensation consultant, individual employment agreements for full vesting of achievement of a level of performance resulting in an MIP award for fiscal 2009 of 67% of the targeted MIP award for the year. The awards for Mr. Naylor, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Tripathy had a three-year service condition as well as a condition for full vesting of achievement of a level of performance resulting in an LRPIP award for fiscal2009-2011 of 67% of the targeted LRPIP award for the period. At the time the ECC made these awards, we believed this performance was reasonably achievable. Performance below these target levels results in a pro rata reduction in the number of shares vested. We believe these awards perform an important retention function.

Other Elements of Compensation
Retirement Benefits.  Although we have a broad-based defined benefit pension plan under which benefits accrue based on compensation and service, the plan was closed to new participants as of February 1, 2006. In fiscal 2009, alleach of our named executive officers other than Mr. Tripathy participated in this plan. We also maintainthat set their terms of employment, including compensation, benefits and termination and change of control provisions discussed below under “Severance and Change of Control Provisions.” The agreements establish a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Campbell and Mr. Barron participate in our primary SERP benefit program, and Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman participate in our alternative SERP benefit program.
Deferred Compensation.  Our named executive officers can defer up to 20%minimum level of base salary and up to 100% of anyprovide for participation in SIP, MIP and LRPIP, bonuses under our Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, an electiveat levels commensurate with the executive’s position and responsibilities and subject to the terms established by the ECC, and also entitle the executives to participate in TJX’s fringe benefit and deferred compensation plan. Amounts deferred are notionally invested in mutual funds or other market investments, as specified by the plan administrator. Participants in the ESP (other than those eligible for our primary SERP benefit) receive an employer match, subject to a vesting schedule, that is similarly notionally invested. It has been our practice to purchase investments specified by participants, thus realizing the actual returnplans.

Each of the notional investments. Of our named executive officers, Mr. Naylor,employment agreements with Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Herrman, and Mr. Tripathy were eligibleNaylor, described in our proxy statement for an ESP match in fiscal 2009, although of these named executive officers only Mr. Naylor elected to participate in ESP.

Amounts previously deferred under our General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, now closed to new investment, are credited to an account that earns notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on U.S. Treasury securities until distributed.
Perquisites.  In fiscal 2009, we provided a limited amount of perquisites2011 and other personal benefits to our named executive officers, all of which are detailed in footnote 9with the notes and narrative to the Summary Compensation Table below: (i) an automobile benefit, (ii) financialcompensation tables below, became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2012 and, tax planning services, (iii) employer contributions or credits under the Company’s qualifiedunless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms, continues until February 2, 2013 for Ms. Meyrowitz and non-qualified savings plansMr. Herrman and (iv) payment of life insurance premiums.


18


Employment Agreement with President and Chief Executive Officer.until February 1, 2014 for Mr. Naylor. In March 2009January 2012, we entered into a new employment agreement with Carol Meyrowitz, our PresidentMr. Rossi that became effective at the beginning of fiscal 2013 and, CEO, effective as of February 1, 2009, that continues until January 29, 2011, unless earlier terminated earlier in accordance with its provisions. The ECC, with the assistance of Mr. Cammarata, negotiated this agreement with Ms. Meyrowitz and was advised by Cook with respect to its terms. Under the agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz is entitled to an annual base salary of not less than $1,475,000, the current level of her base salary, consistent with our freeze of merit increases for most employees. Sheterms, continues to be eligible to participate in specified benefit programs including MIP and LRPIP at levels commensurate with her position and responsibilities, with a target award for each of 100% of her base salary, and subject to such terms as are established by the ECC. Ms. Meyrowitz agreed to eliminate her right to a taxgross-up payment for certain taxes that might be incurred in connection with a change of control and to severance benefits upon certain voluntary terminations without good reason following a change of control. Her severance benefits following an involuntary termination without cause or a voluntary termination for good reason and her non-competition and non-solicitation provisions following any termination of employment were increased totwenty-four months. In connection with her agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz was awarded 300,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock.
Employment Agreement with Vice Chairman.  In June 2008, we entered into auntil February 1, 2014. This new employment agreement with our Vice Chairman, Donald Campbell that continues untilreplaces his previous two-year agreement entered into in January 29, 2011, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its provisions. Under2010 and, among other things, set his agreement, Mr. Campbell was entitled to a minimum base salary of $785,000 and continued participation in specified benefit programs at levels commensurate with his position and responsibilities, taking into account any modified schedule. Pursuant to the agreement and as approved by the ECC, the level of services Mr. Campbell provided to the Company was reduced to 37% of his prior full-time level, effective September 15, 2008, with a prorata reduction in his base salary and his outstanding MIP and LRPIP award opportunities. Mr. Campbell agreed to non-competition agreement and non-solicitation provisions during the term of his employment and for 18 months thereafter, in the case of the non-competition provisions, and 24 months thereafter, in the case of the non-solicitation provisions. On April 7, 2009, Mr. Campbell retired as Vice Chairman of TJX but agreed to continue his employment under his employment agreement on aper diembasis as requested by TJX.
Employment Agreement with Senior Executive Vice President, Group President.  On April 3, 2008, we entered into a letter agreement with Arnold Barron, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, extending the term of his employment agreement until January 31, 2009. Under the letter agreement, Mr. Barron agreed that he would not be entitled to any LRPIP award for which the applicable performance period would extend beyond January 31, 2009 but would remain eligible to receive stock option awards with service-based vesting conditions during the term of his employment. On November 1, 2008, Mr. Barron resigned as an executive officer and continued his employment in an executive advisory role through his retirement on January 31, 2009.
Separation Agreement with Former Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer.  Nirmal Tripathy, Executive Vice President and CFO, resigned, effective January 31, 2009, and we entered into a separation agreement with Mr. Tripathy in which we agreed to treat his termination of employment as though it had been without cause, with specified modifications, and Mr. Tripathy agreed to provide TJX a release of claims. Mr. Tripathy remains subject to the non-competition and non-solicitation agreements in his employment agreement, as well as a non-disparagement agreement contained in his separation agreement.
Amendments to Employment Agreements with Senior Executive Vice President, Group President and Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer.  In April 2009, Mr. Herrman, Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, and Mr. Naylor, Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, entered into amendments to their agreements, effective February 1, 2009, to provide that MIP and LRPIP-based payouts upon a termination without cause or certain voluntary terminations without good reason will be measured by actual, rather than target, performance, to eliminate their right to a taxgross-up payment for certain taxes that might be incurred in connection with a change of control and to severance benefits upon certain voluntary terminations without good reason following a change of control and to increase their severance benefits following an involuntary termination without cause or a


19

$780,000.


voluntary termination for good reason and, in the case of Mr. Naylor, hisnon-competition provision following any termination of employment, to twenty-four months.
Severance and Change of Control Provisions.Provisions  During fiscal 2009, each of our named executive officers had an agreement that provided employment and.    We provide severance terms, including in connection with a change of control in our employment agreements and non-competitionplans, and, non-solicitation undertakings. Provisions ofas with Mr. Sweetenham, in separate arrangements that may be negotiated in connection with a departure. In connection with these agreements relating to termination and change of control are summarized below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.” We provided these agreements because we believe that it is important to define the relative obligations of TJX and ourterms, each named executive officers, including obtaining protection against competitionofficer has agreed to post-employment non-competition, non-solicitation and solicitation, andother covenants intended to protect our business. We believe that severance and change of control protections assist in attracting and retaining high quality executives and in keeping them focused on their responsibilities during any period in which a change of control may be contemplated or pending.
pending and that, more generally, it is important to define the relative obligations of TJX and our named executive officers, including obtaining protection against competition

and solicitation. We seek to achieve these objectives in a manner consistent with our shareholder-friendly pay practices, taking into account contractual obligations and current market practice, among other considerations, such as foreign status. These provisions are described under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

Stock Ownership Guidelines.Guidelines.    We have stock ownership guidelines that apply to all of our executive officers, which are summarized in more detailofficers. As described above under “Stock Ownership Guidelines”Guidelines for Directors and Executives” in the “Corporate Governance” section.Governance,” our Chief Executive Officer is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value equal to at least five times annual base compensation and our President, our Chief Financial Officer and each Senior Executive Vice President is expected to attain stock ownership with a fair market value of at least three times annual base compensation. These guidelines are designed to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholdersstockholders and to encourage a long-term focus. Also, ourOur policies also prohibit our executivesexecutive officers from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to TJX stock.

Each of our executive officers is in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines and policies.

Tax and Accounting Considerations.Considerations.    We generally structure U.S. incentive compensation arrangements to qualifywith a view towards qualifying them as performance-based compensation exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code,, but we view the availability of a tax deduction as only one relevant consideration. We are seeking stockholder approval of the performance goals under MIP and LRPIP, consistent with Section 162(m), and we continue to emphasize performance-based compensation for executives and thus generally minimize the effect of Section 162(m) of the Code.. However, the ECC believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that attracts, retains and rewards the executive talent necessary for our success. Consequently, the ECC authorizes compensation that is not performance-based in excess of $1 million.

million that is not exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m).

Equity Grant Practices.Practices.    All of our equity awards are made under our stockholder approvedstockholder-approved SIP. Virtually all of our stock options and other equity-based awards are granted at the same regularly scheduled ECC meetings held onat approximately the same datestimes each year. The specific dates of the meetings are setscheduled by the Board, along with its determination of all regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, generally about two years in advance. In limited circumstances, typically at regularly scheduled ECC meetings and in connection with new hires or promotions, the ECC approves or grants stock options and stock awards at other times during the year at pre-scheduled ECC meetings.year. The ECC does not have any programs, plans or practices of timing these equity grants in coordination with the release of material non-public information. The exercise price of each stock option grant is the closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The SIP prohibits, without stockholder approval, any repricing requiring stockholder approval under applicable NYSE rules.

Executive Compensation Committee ProcessesReport

We have reviewed and Procedures

The ECC is responsible for overseeing executive compensationdiscussed the Compensation Discussion and benefits. The ECC has the authority, without Board or management approval, to retain and terminate its compensation consultants and to determine their fees and terms of engagement. In addition, the ECC may delegate its authority to a subcommittee and may establish formal procedures to govern its operation, as it deems appropriate.
In determining the compensation program for TJX and setting the compensation of our named executive officers, the ECC generally provides for total compensation and each of its elements by position level and individual performance, weighted toward performance-based incentive compensation. Cook advises the ECCAnalysis with respect to compensation for our named executive officers. The level of Cook’s engagement and its fees are determined by the ECC. In fiscal 2009, Cook advised the ECC with respect to the level and mix of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer, including comparative data for the peer group. In fiscal 2009, the ECC also considered a report by Hay, TJX’s compensation consultant,management. Based on company-wide, long-term incentive compensation.


20


The ECCthese reviews and approves compensation matters at various meetings during the year. The ECC generally acts as follows including with respect to our named executive officers:
Meeting
Action
JuneOverall executive compensation review and base salary changes approved
SeptemberGrant of stock options under SIP
January/FebruaryReview of potential incentive award opportunities under MIP and LRPIP
AprilCertification of performance results for performance-based restricted stock awards previously granted under SIP with performance targets for or ending in prior fiscal year
Grant of performance-based restricted stock awards under SIP
Certification of performance results under MIP awards for prior fiscal year and LRPIP awards with cycles ending in prior fiscal year
Establishment of MIP targets for current fiscal year and LRPIP targets for cycles beginning in current fiscal year
Regular/SpecialApproval of employment agreements and grants of equity incentives to senior executives including executive officers in the case of promotions, new hires and other circumstances
Our named executive officers play a limited role in the executive compensation process. Each named executive officer provides annual performance reviews of any named executive officers directly reporting to him or her. In addition, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the ECC regarding base salaries and other elements of compensation for the other named executive officers. The ECC then considers those performance reviews and recommendations in establishing base salaries, cash incentive awards and equity grants. The Corporate Governance Committee performs the annual performance review of our Chief Executive Officer, which the ECC considers in determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer.
Our named executive officers participate in our strategic planning process and recommenddiscussions, we recommended to the Board that the annual plansCompensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for TJX and its divisions. These plans are the basis for the MIP and LRPIP performance targets and the restricted stock performance criteria, all of which are approved by the ECC. In addition, Mr. Campbell, Vice Chairman (through September 2008), and Mr. Herrman, Senior fiscal year ended January 28, 2012.

Executive Vice President, Group President (starting in September 2008) assisted the ECC in its administration of the MIP, LRPIP, SIP, SERP, GDCP and ESP and advised the ECC regarding the general design and structure of these incentive plans. Mr. Cammarata, Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Campbell (through September 2008) and Mr. Herrman regularly attended ECC meetings at the request of the ECC, although the ECC met in executive session at all regularly scheduled meetings.


21

Compensation Committee


Alan M. Bennett,Chair

José B. Alvarez

John F. O’Brien

Willow B. Shire

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer and fourour three other most highly paid executive officers during fiscal 20092012 (collectively, our named executive officers):

                                     
              Change in
    
              Pension
    
              Value and
    
              Nonqualified
    
            Non-Equity
 Deferred
 All Other
  
Name and
 Fiscal
     Stock
 Option
 Incentive Plan
 Compensation
 Compensation
  
Principal Position
 Year(4) Salary Bonus Awards(5) Awards(5) Compensation(6) Earnings(7) (8),(9) Total
 
Carol Meyrowitz  2009  $1,503,366     $2,438,982  $838,749  $2,258,393  $1,636,542  $43,040  $8,719,072 
President and Chief  2008  $1,400,000     $2,578,770  $797,304  $2,305,830  $1,492,146  $55,034  $8,629,084 
Executive Officer  2007  $1,076,731     $3,135,084  $1,048,938  $2,017,580  $268,076  $38,837  $7,585,246 
Donald G. Campbell(1)  2009  $609,885     $388,306  $655,430  $926,200  $193,565  $42,429  $2,815,815 
Vice Chairman  2008  $773,558     $770,409  $696,536  $985,209  $242,165  $39,166  $3,507,043 
   2007  $740,769     $513,032  $991,458  $897,333  $145,379  $37,989  $3,325,960 
Ernie L. Herrman  2009  $897,019     $522,534  $540,489  $1,092,175  $89,367  $43,160  $3,184,744 
Senior Executive
Vice President,
  2008  $757,211     $800,168  $597,340  $934,392  $51,447  $67,138  $3,207,696 
Group President                                    
Arnold S. Barron(2)  2009  $766,442     $147,609  $515,646  $1,047,093  $536,853  $41,967  $3,055,610 
Senior Executive  2008  $723,558     $800,168  $597,340  $934,262  $439,911  $43,106  $3,538,345 
Vice President,
Group President
  2007  $672,673     $451,687  $768,413  $728,728  $325,623  $41,769  $2,988,893 
Jeffrey G. Naylor(3)  2009  $741,154     $446,765  $515,646  $1,036,955  $68,053  $52,253  $2,860,826 
Senior Executive  2008  $683,654     $415,001  $614,183  $896,171  $60,863  $74,886  $2,744,758 
Vice President,
Chief Administrative
and Business Development Officer
  2007  $627,596     $340,098  $832,594  $668,120  $48,684  $44,957  $2,562,049 
Nirmal K. Tripathy(3)  2009  $654,327     $68,999  $121,093  $489,873  $0  $137,934  $1,472,226 
Executive Vice President,  2008  $396,635  $100,000  $372,609  $34,917  $621,047  $0  $411,674  $1,936,882 
Chief Financial Officer                                    

Name and
Principal Position

 Fiscal
Year
  Salary(1)  Bonus  Stock
Awards(2)
  Option
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(3)
  Change in
Pension Value
and Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(4)
  All Other
Compensation(5)
  Total 

Carol Meyrowitz(6)

  2012   $1,320,000           $708,954   $4,309,576   $4,700,459   $48,660   $11,087,649  

Chief Executive
Officer

  2011   $1,575,000       $12,559,150   $947,524   $4,127,571   $3,826,370   $43,495   $23,079,110  
  2010   $1,475,000       $7,692,000   $1,168,840   $4,409,361   $2,565,940   $50,971   $17,362,112  

Ernie L. Herrman(7)

  2012   $1,100,000           $591,537   $2,008,860   $432,987   $310,681   $4,444,065  

President

  2011   $987,021       $4,664,150   $631,755   $1,839,085   $250,167   $294,210   $8,666,388  
  2010   $925,000       $772,500   $779,390   $1,747,180   $190,998   $41,280   $4,456,348  

Jeffrey G. Naylor(8)

  2012   $823,078       $1,488,000   $443,227   $1,601,933   $272,302   $243,994   $4,872,534  

Senior Executive Vice
President, Chief
Financial and
Administrative Officer

  2011   $773,656       $1,419,200   $473,925   $1,506,429   $178,511   $239,892   $4,591,613  
  2010   $740,000       $643,750   $584,666   $1,543,680   $114,886   $115,375   $3,742,357  
         
         

Jerome Rossi

  2012   $773,943       $595,200   $443,227   $976,558   $649,987   $43,473   $3,482,388  

Senior Executive Vice
President, Group
President

  2011   $730,290       $842,650   $473,925   $1,018,251   $744,267   $43,559   $3,852,942  
  2010   $700,000       $309,000   $584,666   $1,090,900   $873,736   $43,347   $3,601,649  
         

Paul Sweetenham(9)

  2012   $838,864       $1,240,000   $320,443   $1,122,305       $1,168,166   $4,689,778  

Senior Executive Vice
President, Group
President, Europe

  2011   $812,035       $1,419,200   $342,652   $830,100       $354,696   $3,758,683  
  2010   $734,349       $515,000   $350,922   $969,251       $310,987   $2,880,509  
         

(1)Effective April 7, 2009, Mr. Campbell retired as Vice Chairman of TJX but will continue as an employee providing services on a per diem basis.
(2)Effective as of November 1, 2008, Mr. Barron resigned as Senior Executive Vice President, Group President, and continued his employment in an executive advisory roleReflects salary adjustments during the transition period beginning on that date and ending on his retirement on January 31, 2009.
(3)Effective January 31, 2009, Mr. Tripathy resigned as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Naylor was named Chief Financial and Administrative Officer on February 1, 2009.
(4)Fiscal 2009 was a 53-weekfiscal year.

(5)(2)Reflects the amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for fiscal 2009aggregate fair value of stock and option awards on the grant date, computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS No. 123(R)). In accordance with SEC rules, these amounts exclude estimates of forfeitures in the case of awards with service-based vesting conditions. Stock and option awards are valued in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R).relevant accounting rules. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. Option awards are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are disclosedfurther discussed in Note HI to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2009. The Stock Awards amount for fiscal 2009 excludes the impact of 31,876 share awards forfeited by Mr. Barron in connection with his retirement and 34,467 share awards forfeited by Mr. Tripathy in connection with his resignation. The Option Awards amount for fiscal 2009 for Mr. Tripathy includes compensation cost relating to 45,670 options that will not vest and were forfeited as a result of his resignation.2012.

(6)(3)Reflects the total amounts earned under theboth MIP and LRPIP. For fiscal 2012, MIP amounts were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $2,335,413; Mr. Herrman,$1,037,960; Mr. Naylor, $631,033; Mr. Rossi, $456,433; and Mr. Sweetenham, $136,048. For the LRPIP duringcycle for fiscal 2009.2010-2012, the amounts were: Ms. Meyrowitz, $1,974,163; Mr. Herrman, $970,900; Mr. Naylor, $970,900; Mr. Rossi, $520,125 and Mr. Sweetenham, $986,257. Amounts earned were paid to participants in April 20092012 following the Executive Compensation Committee’sECC’s certification of performance results under the plans. In fiscal 2009, our named executive officers earned the following amountsresults.


22


(4)
under the MIP: Ms. Meyrowitz ($1,095,803), Mr. Campbell ($244,500), Mr. Herrman ($352,345), Mr. Barron ($307,263), Mr. Naylor ($297,125) and Mr. Tripathy ($214,623). Our named executive officers earned the following amounts under the LRPIP cycles ending in fiscal 2009: Ms. Meyrowitz ($1,162,590), Mr. Campbell ($681,700), Mr. Herrman ($739,830), Mr. Barron ($739,830), Mr. Naylor ($739,830) and Mr. Tripathy ($275,250).
(7)Amounts reflectReflects the change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefit obligations under our broad-based retirement plan and our SERP. Mr. Sweetenham did not participate in these plans. Our named executive officers did not receive above-market or preferential earnings on non-tax qualified deferred compensation.

(8)(5)The table below provides additional details about the amounts listed under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2012. Perquisites and other personal benefits are valued on an aggregate incremental cost basis. All figures shown below in this footnote 95 represent the direct dollar cost incurred by us in providing these perquisites and other personal benefits to our named executive officers.benefits.

  Automobile
Benefit
  Reimbursement
for Financial,
Tax
Planning and
Legal Services
  Employer
Contributions  or
Credits Under
Savings Plans(a)
  Company
Paid
Amounts
for Life
Insurance(b)
  Paid or
Accrued
Termination
Payments(c)
  Total
All Other
Compensation
 

Carol Meyrowitz

 $35,904   $6,638   $4,983   $1,135       $48,660  

Ernie L. Herrman

 $35,904   $1,500   $272,142   $1,135       $310,681  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

 $35,904   $1,500   $205,455   $1,135       $243,994  

Jerome Rossi

 $35,904   $1,500   $4,934   $1,135       $43,473  

Paul Sweetenham

 $35,434   $11,184   $67,109   $2,035   $1,052,404   $1,168,166  

 
(9)The table below shows amounts under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2009:
                 
           Company-
 
        Employer
  Paid
 
     Financial
  Contributions or
  Amounts
 
  Automobile
  and Tax
  Credits under
  for Life
 
Name
 Benefit  Planning  Savings Plans(a)  Insurance 
 
Carol Meyrowitz $36,594  $1,500  $3,731  $1,215 
Donald G. Campbell $36,594  $1,500  $3,120  $1,215 
Ernie L. Herrman $36,594  $1,500  $3,732  $1,334 
Arnold S. Barron $35,529  $1,500  $3,723  $1,215 
Jeffrey G. Naylor $36,594  $1,500  $12,944  $1,215 
Nirmal K. Tripathy(b) $29,731  $0  $2,418  $1,215 
(a)Amounts reflectReflects matching contributions under our 401(k) plan and,as well as, in the case of Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, the matching credits under our ESP. For Mr. Sweetenham, the amount reflects matching contributions under our U.K. retirement plan. As a U.K. resident, Mr. Sweetenham did not participate in our U.S. retirement or deferred compensation plans.

 
(b)Reflects company-paid amounts under our management life insurance program or, for Mr. Herrman, payment in lieu of participation in that program.

In addition,(c)Reflects amounts accrued at the end of fiscal 2012 with respect to Mr. Tripathy received a paymentSweetenham’s departure from TJX, consisting of $104,570payments by TJX UK in respect of his U.K. contractual rights of £567,887 and accrued holiday pay of £90,812. Mr. Sweetenham is eligible to receive additional termination-related amounts if he satisfies non-competition, non-solicitation and related obligations to us. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

(6)Consistent with SEC reporting rules, Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awards and total compensation reported above for fiscal 2012 do not include the value of 240,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock with service and performance conditions relating to fiscal 2012 and intended by the ECC as compensation for fiscal 2012 which were granted at the end of fiscal 2011 and reported in the 2011 proxy statement.

(7)Mr. Herrman’s stock awards and total compensation for fiscal 2012 do not include his award of 110,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock granted at the end of fiscal 2011 and reported in the 2011 proxy statement.

(8)Mr. Naylor served as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer through the end of fiscal 2012 and, as of the beginning of fiscal 2013, serves as Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer.

(9)Mr. Sweetenham was generally paid in U.K. pounds sterling. The amounts shown in the table are converted from pounds sterling at the average annual exchange rate of $1.5977 per pound for fiscal 2012, $1.5466 per pound for fiscal 2011 and $1.5895 per pound for fiscal 2010. The equity awards granted Mr. Sweetenham during fiscal 2012 were forfeited in connection with his resignation.departure, as further described below.

Total compensation for our named executive officers is composedconsists of base salary, short-term and long-term cash incentives, long-term equity-basedequity incentives, retirement and deferred compensation benefits and limited perquisites. During fiscal 2009, each of our named executive officers had an employment agreement that provided for a base salary of not less than the amount of such officer’s base salaryMr. Sweetenham also received termination-related payments in connection with his departure, as of the effective date of the employment agreement.further described below. Our named executive officers were entitled under their employment agreements to participationparticipate in our SIP, MIP and LRPIP and received cash and equity incentives only pursuant to our MIP or LRPIPthese plans during fiscal 20092012. Ms. Meyrowitz’s agreement provides for target awards during the term of the agreement of at least 150% of her base salary for MIP and in the caseat least 100% of Mr. Tripathy, the payment made in connectionher base salary for LRPIP and for an automobile allowance commensurate with his separation. Our named executive officers other than Mr. Tripathy also participated in our tax-qualified defined benefit plan; her position.

Ms. Meyrowitz Mr. Campbell and Mr. BarronRossi participated in our primary SERP benefit and Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor participated in our alternative SERP benefit. All of our U.S. named executive officers participated in our tax-qualified defined benefit plan and were eligible to make deferrals to our 401(k) plan and our ESP, although onlyESP. Mr. Naylor and Mr. Herrman and Mr. Tripathy were eligible forreceived matching contributionscredits under the ESP during all or part of fiscal 2012. Mr. Sweetenham, as a resident of the U.K., participated in a retirement plan for U.K. Associates under which they may defer salary and of thesebonus and receive an employer match. Our named executive officers only Mr. Naylor electedwere entitled to make deferrals to the ESP during fiscal 2009. The employment agreements of our named executive officers entitled them toreceive an automobile benefit and participationto participate in employee benefit and fringe benefit plans and programs made available to executives generally. For our executives, all other compensation items including perquisites comprise a small portion of overall total compensation.


23


Grants of Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 20092012

The following table reports potential payouts under our cash incentive plans and all other stock and option awards that were granted during fiscal 20092012 to our named executive officers.

                                             
                All Other
 All Other
    
                Stock
 Option
    
                Awards:
 Awards:
   Grant Date
    Estimated Future Payouts
 Estimated Future Payouts
 Number of
 Number of
 Exercise or
 Fair Value
    Under Non-Equity Incentive
 Under Equity Incentive
 Shares of
 Securities
 Base Price
 of Stock
Name and
 Grant
 Plan Awards ($) Plan Awards (# of Shares) Stock or
 Underlying
 of Option
 and Option
Award Type
 Date Threshold Target Maximum Threshold Target Maximum Units Options Awards(1) Awards(2)
 
Carol Meyrowitz                                            
MIP(3)  04/01/08     $1,503,366  $3,006,732                             
LRPIP(4)  04/01/08     $1,400,000  $2,100,000                             
Stock Options  09/08/08               102,630   102,630   102,630         $35.03  $1,073,510 
Stock Awards  04/01/08                  25,000   25,000             $851,000 
   02/02/08                  35,000   35,000             $1,123,500 
Donald G. Campbell                                            
MIP(3)(5)  04/01/08     $335,437  $670,873                             
LRPIP(4)(5)  04/01/08     $351,000  $526,500                             
Stock Options  09/08/08               68,430   68,430   68,430         $35.03  $715,778 
Ernie L. Herrman                                            
MIP(3)  04/01/08     $493,361  $986,722                             
LRPIP(4)  04/01/08     $700,000  $1,050,000                             
Stock Options  09/08/08               68,430   68,430   68,430         $35.03  $715,778 
Stock Awards  04/01/08                  12,188   12,188             $414,880 
Arnold S. Barron                                            
MIP(3)  04/01/08      $421,543  $843,086                             
LRPIP(4)  04/01/08     $700,000  $1,050,000                             
Stock Options  09/08/08              51,330   51,330   51,330         $35.03  $536,912 
Jeffrey G. Naylor                                            
MIP(3)  04/01/08     $407,635  $815,270                             
LRPIP(4)  04/01/08     $700,000  $1,050,000                             
Stock Options  09/08/08               51,330   51,330   51,330         $35.03  $536,912 
Stock Awards  04/01/08                  12,188   12,188             $414,880 
Nirmal K. Tripathy                                            
MIP(3)  04/01/08     $294,447  $588,894                             
LRPIP(4)  04/01/08     $300,000  $450,000                             
Stock Options  09/08/08               25,670   25,670   25,670         $35.03  $268,508 
Stock Awards  04/01/08                  7,800   7,800             $265,512 
officers:

Name and

Award Type

 Grant
Date
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (#)
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
  Exercise or
Base Price
of Options
Awards(1)
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards(2)
 
  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum     

Carol Meyrowitz

           

MIP(3)

      $1,980,000   $3,960,000         

LRPIP(4)

      $1,320,000   $1,980,000         

Stock Options

  09/07/11           108,320   $26.555   $708,954  

Stock Awards(5)

                             

Ernie L. Herrman

           

MIP(3)

      $880,000   $1,760,000         

LRPIP(4)

      $1,100,000   $1,650,000         

Stock Options

  09/07/11           90,380   $26.555   $591,537  

Stock Awards(5)

                             

Jeffrey G. Naylor

           

MIP(3)

      $535,000   $1,070,000         

LRPIP(4)

      $700,000   $1,050,000         

Stock Options

  09/07/11           67,720   $26.555   $443,227  

Stock Awards

  04/04/11       0    60,000    60,000         $1,488,000  

Jerome Rossi

           

MIP(3)

      $386,970   $773,940         

LRPIP(4)

      $375,000   $562,500         

Stock Options

  09/07/11              67,720   $26.555   $443,227  

Stock Awards

  04/04/11       0    24,000    24,000      $595,200  

Paul Sweetenham

           

MIP(3)

      $461,375   $922,750         

LRPIP(4)

      $700,000   $1,050,000         

Stock Options

  09/07/11           48,960   $26.555   $320,443  

Stock Awards

  04/04/11       0    50,000    50,000         $1,240,000  

(1)All option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant.

(2)Reflects the aggregate fair market value of stock and optionsoption awards on the grant date. Stock awards are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. Option awards are valued onusing the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further discussed in Note HI to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 2009.2012.

(3)Reflects MIP award opportunities under the fiscal 2012 MIP for fiscal 2009.which performance is complete. Actual amounts earned under the fiscal 20092012 MIP awards are showndisclosed in footnote 63 to the Summary Compensation Table.

(4)Reflects award opportunities forunder the fiscal 2012-2014 LRPIP cycle for fiscal2009-2011.cycle. Amounts earned by Mr. BarronSweetenham under LRPIP are paid in pounds sterling based on the exchange rate in effect at the end of the cycle.

(5)Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Campbell forfeited theirHerrman received performance-based restricted stock awards at the end of fiscal2009-2011 2011 and did not receive stock awards upon retirement and Mr. Tripathy forfeited hisin fiscal 2009-2011 award upon his resignation.
(5)Reflects reduced-time employment effective September 15, 2008.2012.
A significant portion of each named executive officer’s total compensation is composed of equity-based and

Non-Equity Incentive Plan amounts above reflect short-term cash incentive compensation. Short-term cash incentives are granted under our MIP and long-term cash incentives are granted under our LRPIP. AsOur MIP and LRPIP are discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,Analysis. MIP awards are based on actual performance against targets for aggregate adjusted pre-tax income for our divisions for the fiscal year set by the ECC. The target award for each named executive officer is set as a percentage of base salary; if our performance meets the targeted performance, the named executive officer receives his or her target award. If our performance exceeds the targeted performance, the named executive officer can earn


24


up to a specified maximum (as shown above), but, under the terms of the MIP, not more than two times the target award or $5 million per award for officers whose compensation is subject to the limits on deductibility under Code Section 162(m). If our performance does not meet the targeted performance, the named executives will receive no awards or awards below target, based on the extent to which performance falls below target awards. Similarly, LRPIP awards are based on performance against targets for multi-year cumulative aggregate adjusted pre-tax income for our divisions set by the ECC. Like our MIP, our named executive officers are paid performance awards under the LRPIP only to the extent that multi-year performance targets are achieved. LRPIP participants can earn up to the specified maximum, shown above, but, under the terms of the LRPIP, not more than 150% of the target award or $5 million per award for officers whose compensation is subject to the limits on deductibility under Code Section 162(m).
In fiscal 2009,2012, we granted all equity incentives, including stock options and performance-based restricted stock, under our SIP. Stock options generally have a maximum term of ten years and generally vest in equal annual installments over three years, upon a change of control and in the event of certain early terminations of employment. In the event a named executive officer’s employment is terminated by reason of death, disability, or retirement at or after age 65 with five or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for up to five years following termination, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. Following a retirement at or after age 65 with ten or more years of service, or a retirement at or after age 60 with twenty or more years of service, vested options generally remain exercisable for five years following termination and unvested options continue to vest for the three yearthree-year period following retirement on the same basis as if the named executive officer had not retired and will remain exercisable for an extended period, unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. In the event of any other termination, other than a termination for cause, vested options for our named executive officers generally remain exercisable for six months following termination (or such other period of up to three years as the ECC determines at or after the grant date), unless the option terminates on an earlier date pursuant to its terms. All options, whether or not then vested, are forfeited on a termination for cause.

The restricted stock grantsawards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except that awards fully vest upon a change of control and for Ms. Meyrowitz in the event of certain early terminations of employment.control. Forperformance-based restricted stock granted to our named executive officers in fiscal 2009,2012, the service-based conditions are satisfied by three years of continuous employment (one yearthrough the scheduled vesting date (or, for Ms. Meyrowitz)Mr. Naylor, through the end of fiscal 2013), and the performance-based conditions are tied to the corporate performance target under our MIP,LRPIP for the fiscal 2012-2014 cycle, with full vesting subject to achievement of a payout of at least 67% of the target payout under LRPIP for the cycle. If the LRPIP payout is less than 67% for the cycle, a prorated portion of the unvested award will be forfeited. If no LRPIP payout is achieved for the cycle, the entire unvested award will be forfeited. When a participant’s shares of restricted stock vest, the participant is entitled to any dividends paid on the shares while they were restricted.

After the close of fiscal 2012, the ECC modified the service-based condition applicable to Mr. Rossi’s award in connection with his new employment agreement. As modified, the caseservice-based condition would be satisfied by Mr. Rossi’s continued employment through fiscal 2014 (to correspond with the term of Ms. Meyrowitz,his new agreement), with any additional service condition waived, and our LRPIP, inhe would be entitled to the case of Mr. Naylor, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Tripathy. Our fiscal 2009 grants of equity and non-equity incentive plan compensation reflect our general approachaward to long-term compensation, with long-term cash incentive awards making up a larger share of our named executive officers’ total compensation relative to stock option incentives.


25the extent the original performance-based conditions are met.


Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End2012 Year End

The following table provides information on outstanding option and stock awards for named executive officersheld as of January 31, 2009:

                                     
  Option Awards     Stock Awards
                Equity
 Equity
                Incentive
 Incentive
      Equity Incentive
       Market
 Plan Awards:
 Plan Awards:
      Plan Awards:
     Number of
 Value of
 Number of
 Market or
  Number of
 Number of
 Number of
     Shares or
 Shares or
 Unearned
 Payout Value
  Securities
 Securities
 Securities
     Units of
 Units of
 Shares,
 of Unearned
  Underlying
 Underlying
 Underlying
     Stock That
 Stock That
 Units or
 Shares, Units or
  Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Option
 Option
 Have Not
 Have Not
 Other Rights
 Other Rights
  Options
 Options
 Unearned
 Exercise
 Expiration
 Vested
 Vested
 That Have
 That Have
Name
 Exercisable(1) Unexercisable(1) Options Price Date (2),(4) (2),(3) Not Vested(4) Not Vested(3)
 
Carol Meyrowitz  85,000   42,500   0  $27.0000   09/06/16   160,000  $3,107,200         
   40,000   80,000      $29.2300   09/10/17                 
      102,630      $35.0300   09/08/18                 
Donald G. Campbell  24,800      0  $19.8500   09/04/12   20,000  $388,400         
   225,000         $20.1400   09/09/13                 
   150,000         $21.7500   09/08/14                 
   75,000         $21.4300   09/07/15                 
   56,667   28,333      $27.0000   09/06/16                 
   26,667   53,333      $29.2300   09/10/17                 
      68,430      $35.0300   09/08/18                 
Ernie L. Herrman  40,000      0  $20.1400   09/09/13   15,938  $309,516   28,126  $546,207 
   137,500         $21.7500   09/08/14                 
   75,000         $21.4300   09/07/15                 
   42,500   21,250      $27.0000   09/06/16                 
   20,000   40,000      $29.2300   09/10/17                 
      68,430      $35.0300   09/08/18                 
Arnold S. Barron  97,500      0  $21.7500   01/31/14   15,938  $309,516   15,938  $309,516 
   75,000         $21.4300   01/31/14                 
   42,500   21,250      $27.0000   01/31/14                 
   20,000   40,000      $29.2300   01/31/14                 
      51,330      $35.0300   01/31/14                 
Jeffrey G. Naylor  75,000      0  $22.8200   02/02/14   15,938  $309,516   28,126  $546,207 
   150,000         $21.7500   09/08/14                 
   75,000         $21.4300   09/07/15                 
   42,500   21,250      $27.0000   09/06/16                 
   20,000   40,000      $29.2300   09/10/17                 
      51,330      $35.0300   09/08/18                 
Nirmal K. Tripathy  10,000   20,000   0  $29.2300   07/31/09   16,667  $323,673   18,000  $349,560 
      25,670      $35.0300   07/31/09                 
28, 2012 by our named executive officers:

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised

Options
Exercisable(1)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Unexercisable(1)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise

Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(3)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(2)(3)
  Equity Incentive Plan
Awards:
 
        Number of
Unearned
Shares,

Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(3)
  Market or
Payout Value

of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested(2)(3)
 

Carol Meyrowitz

  127,014    63,506       $18.870    09/17/19      
  58,274    116,546    $20.565    09/09/20      
  0    108,320    $26.555    09/07/21      
       240,000   $8,084,400    240,000   $8,084,400  

Ernie L. Herrman

  60,000    0       $14.615    09/10/17      
  136,860    0    $17.515    09/08/18      
  84,694    42,346    $18.870    09/17/19      
  38,854    77,706    $20.565    09/09/20      
  0    90,380    $26.555    09/07/21      
       60,000   $2,021,100    180,000   $6,063,300  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

  0    31,766       $18.870    09/17/19      
  0    58,292    $20.565    09/09/20      
  0    67,720    $26.555    09/07/21      
       50,000   $1,684,250    110,000   $3,705,350  

Jerome Rossi

  0    31,766       $18.870    09/17/19      
  29,148    58,292    $20.565    09/09/20      
  0    67,720    $26.555    09/07/21      
       24,000   $808,440    48,000   $1,616,880  

Paul Sweetenham(4)

  0    19,066       $18.870    09/17/19      
  0    42,144    $20.565    09/09/20      
  0    48,960    $26.555    09/07/21      
       40,000   $1,347,400    100,000   $3,368,500  

(1)All option awards have a ten-year maximum term and vest in equal annual installments over three years, beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date, and upon a change of control and certain employment terminations. Mr. Barron’s options remain exercisable for the lesser of their original exercise date or five years from his retirement and continue to vest during this period. Mr. Tripathy’s options that were vested on his resignation remain exercisable for six months from his resignation.

(2)Reflects shares that have been earned but that have not vested.
(3)Market values reflect the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on January 30, 200927, 2012 (the last business day of the fiscal year), which was $19.42 per share..


26


(4)(3)The following table shows the scheduled vesting dates for all unvested share awards for our named executive officersofficers’ unvested shares as of January 31, 2009:28, 2012, subject to satisfaction of the performance- and service-based conditions of the award and assuming ECC certification of performance:

Name

Number  of
Unvested
Shares
Vesting Date(a)

Carol Meyrowitz

240,000     03/6/2012
240,000        03/2013(b)
Number of
Name
Unvested SharesVesting Date
Carol Meyrowitz100,00004/07/09
35,00004/07/09
25,00004/07/09
Donald G. Campbell20,00004/07/09
Arnold S. Barron(1)15,93809/04/09
15,93809/06/10
Ernie L. Herrman15,93809/04/09
15,93809/06/10
12,18809/06/11
Jeffrey G. Naylor15,93804/15/09
15,93804/15/10
12,18804/15/11
Nirmal K. Tripathy(1)16,66704/15/09
10,20009/06/10
7,80009/06/11
(1)

Ernie L. Herrman

60,000   09/06/12
70,000   09/06/13
110,000   09/06/14

Jeffrey G. Naylor

50,000   04/15/12
50,000   04/15/13
60,000    03/2014(b)(c)

Jerome Rossi

24,000   09/06/12
24,000   09/06/13
24,000    03/2014(b)(d)

(a)The restricted stock awards have both service-based and performance-based vesting conditions, except that awards fully vest upon a change of control and, for Ms. Meyrowitz, in the event of her death or disability. Each of Ms. Meyrowitz’s stock awards has performance-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied if MIP performance, as certified by the ECC, for the fiscal year immediately preceding the vesting date results in a payout of at least 67% of the corporate MIP target award payout and service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the end of such fiscal year or earlier involuntary termination. Each other stock award shown above has performance-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied if LRPIP performance, as certified by the ECC, for the cycle most recently completed prior to the vesting date results in a payout of at least 67% of the LRPIP target award payout and service-based vesting conditions that will be satisfied by continued employment through the vesting date (except as described below for certain awards held by Mr. BarronNaylor and Mr. Rossi). Each unvested award will be partially forfeited if the payout is less than 67%, or entirely forfeited if no payout is achieved, under MIP or LRPIP, as applicable, for the applicable year or cycle.

(b)Expected date of ECC certification of applicable performance results.

(c)Service-based vesting condition will be satisfied by continued employment through fiscal 2013. In addition to the service- and performance-based vesting conditions, Mr. Naylor’s right to receive and retain the value of the award is subject to his compliance with non-competition, non-solicitation and related restrictions through the end of the two year period following the vesting date (in addition to the restrictions set forth in Mr. Naylor’s employment agreement).

(d)Service-based vesting condition will be satisfied by continued employment through fiscal 2014, as modified by the ECC following the close of fiscal 2012 in connection with Mr. Rossi’s new employment agreement. Prior to the modification, the service-based vesting condition would have been satisfied by continued employment through September 6, 2014.

(4)Mr. Sweetenham’s unvested options and restricted stock awards were forfeited upon his retirement on January 31, 2009. Mr. Tripathy forfeited his unvested awards upon his resignation on January 31, 2009.departure from TJX.

Option Exercises and Stock Awards Vested during Fiscal 20092012

The following table provides information relating to option exercises and stock award vesting of performance-based restricted stock for our named executive officers during fiscal 2009:

                 
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
  Number of
     Number of
    
  Shares
  Value
  Shares
  Value
 
  Acquired
  Realized
  Acquired
  Realized
 
Name
 on Exercise  on Exercise(1)  on Vesting  on Vesting(2) 
 
Carol Meyrowitz  225,000  $2,490,750   142,500  $4,850,700 
Donald G. Campbell  100,200  $1,261,370   43,750  $1,426,438 
Ernie L. Herrman  126,800  $1,718,450   18,750  $638,813 
Arnold S. Barron  123,333  $1,639,236   18,750  $638,813 
Jeffrey G. Naylor  0  $0   18,750  $575,438 
Nirmal K. Tripathy  0  $0   8,333  $255,740 
2012.

   Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Exercise
   Value
Realized
on Exercise(1)
   Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
   Value
Realized
on Vesting(2)
 

Carol Meyrowitz

   136,840    $2,086,228     350,000    $8,914,500  

Ernie L. Herrman

   287,500    $4,196,709     46,376    $1,195,213  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

   315,342    $3,543,549     38,376    $983,287  

Jerome Rossi

   324,320    $3,811,848     29,600    $762,882  

Paul Sweetenham

   184,830    $1,625,492     32,200    $830,599  

(1)Represents the stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on exercise date minus the option exercise price multiplied by the number of shares acquired on exercise.

(2)Represents the fair market value of the shares on the vesting date, calculated as the stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on vesting date.date multiplied by the number of shares vesting.

Pension Benefits

We

In the U.S., we have a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, or Retirement Plan, and a non-qualifiednonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, or SERP. We do not have a policy of granting extra years of credited service for purposes of these plans. Our Retirement Plan was closed to new participants as of February 1, 2006, although participants employed prior to that date continue to accrue benefits. Consistent with industry practices, weWe have not offered primary SERP benefits to any new participants in a number ofmany years and do not currently intend to do so in the future, although we continue to offer an alternative SERP benefit.

Under our Retirement Plan, participants accrue a benefit payable as an annuity at retirement or, if vested, onfollowing an earlier termination of employment. The amount accrued each year onceOnce participation commences after an initial one-year eligibility period, the amount accrued each year, expressed as a life annuity payable commencing at age 65, is 1% of eligible compensation (base salary and MIP awards) up to a periodically adjusted limit ($86,00099,000 in calendar


27


2008 2011 and $90,000$103,000 in calendar 2009)2012) and 1.4% of eligible compensation in excess of that limit. For years of service in excess of 35, the accrual rate is 1% per year of eligible compensation. Compensation for any year in excess of another periodically adjusted limit, currently $245,000, however,$250,000, is disregarded for these purposes. Eligible participants are also entitled to supplemental credits. Benefits under the Retirement Plan generally vest in general, after five years of service. A vested participant who retires or whose employment terminates prior to age 65 with at least ten years of service may elect to receive a reduced annuity benefit at retirement orcommencing at age 55 ifor later.

Under our SERP, the primary benefit provides participants who retire at or after age 55 with at least ten years of service a benefit equal to the value of an annuity commencing at age 65 providing annual payments up to a maximum of 50% of the participant’s final average earnings, less other employer-provided retirement benefits and social security benefits. This benefit, before offsets, accrues at the rate of 2.5% of final average earnings for each year of service not in excess of 20.20 until age 65. In view of his continued service beyond age 65, Mr. Rossi is entitled to additional retirement benefit accruals based on his earnings and service after age 65 if more favorable than his primary benefit under existing SERP terms. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Meyrowitz is entitled to specified interest rate assumptions if more favorable than her primary benefit under existing SERP terms. In determining final average earnings, the primary SERP includes base salary and MIP, but not LRPIP, and uses the highest average of five years over the preceding ten years. The alternative benefit provides participants whose Retirement Plan benefits are affected by Internal Revenue Code benefit restrictions

with the amount of the benefits lost by reason of those restrictions. Participants who are eligible for the primary benefit are eligible to receive the alternative benefit in lieu of the primary benefit if it provides a greater benefit at the time of retirement or other termination of employment. Benefits under SERP benefit isare payable in installments, or in certain other forms of actuarially equivalent value. The alternative benefit provides participants whose regular pension benefits are affected by Internal Revenue Service benefit restrictions with the amount of the benefits lost by reason of those restrictions.

Pension Benefits for Fiscal 2012

The following table provides information on pension benefits for our named executive officers eligible for these benefits as of January 31, 2009:

               
    Number of
 Present
  
    Years
 Value of
 Payments
    Credited
 Accumulated
 During Last
Name
 
Plan Name
 Service(1) Benefit(3) Fiscal Year
 
Carol Meyrowitz Retirement Plan  22  $253,781    
  SERP  20  $6,050,443    
Donald G. Campbell Retirement Plan  34  $408,752    
  SERP  20  $3,133,886    
Ernie L. Herrman Retirement Plan  18  $137,922    
  SERP(2)  18  $284,662    
Arnold S. Barron Retirement Plan  28  $528,137    
  SERP  20  $3,446,162    
Jeffrey G. Naylor Retirement Plan  4  $45,509    
  SERP(2)  4  $148,068    
28, 2012:

Name

  

Plan Name(1)

  Number of
Years of
Credited
Service
   Present
Value  of

Accumulated
Benefit(2)
   Payments
Made During

Last Fiscal
Year
 

Carol Meyrowitz(3)

  Retirement Plan   25    $480,870       
  SERP (Primary)   20    $16,916,123       

Ernie L. Herrman(3)

  Retirement Plan   21    $314,605       
  SERP (Alternative)   21    $982,131       

Jeffrey G. Naylor(3)

  Retirement Plan   7    $157,725       
  SERP (Alternative)   7    $601,551       

Jerome Rossi(3)

  Retirement Plan   15    $415,578       
  SERP (Primary)   20    $5,569,319       

(1)Participants in our Retirement Plan and our alternative SERP benefit program begin to accrue credited service after one year of service with TJX. Participants under our primary SERP benefit began to accrue credited service immediately and are eligible to be credited with a maximum of 20 years of service. Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Campbell, and Mr. Barron are fully vested in their Retirement Plan and primary SERP benefits. Mr. Herrman is fully vested in his Retirement Plan and alternative SERP benefit.

(2)Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor participate in our alternative SERP benefit program.
(3)The underlying valuation methodology and other material assumptions utilized in calculating the present value of the accumulated pension benefits are disclosed in Note KJ to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 2009.2012.

(3)Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Naylor, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Rossi are fully vested in their Retirement Plan and SERP benefits. For purposes of SERP, Mr. Rossi receives credit for his years of service with Marshalls prior to its acquisition by TJX. Instead of these plans, Mr. Sweetenham participated in our U.K. retirement plan, which is not included above because it is a defined contribution plan.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans

We have an Executive Savings Plan, or ESP, which is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan available to key employees. Under the ESP, our U.S. named executive officers and other eligible employeesAssociates can elect to defer up to 20% of base salary and up to 100% of any MIP and LRPIP awards, our directors can elect to defer retainers and meeting fees, and employeesfees. Our U.S. named executive officers not eligible for primary SERP benefits (currently Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor) are eligible to receive matching credits.credits on base salary deferrals of up to 10% of base salary, with an enhanced level of matching credits for a period of up to 15 years. For participants atcalendar 2011, the Vice President level or higher, wepotential match 25%for Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor was 100% of their eligible deferrals, plus, if our MIP performance resulted in a payout of between 90% and 125% of the first 10%target corporate award opportunities for fiscal 2012, an additional match ranging from 50% to 150% of their deferred base salary if we meet our annualeligible deferrals. Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor earned this additional performance-based match at 142.5% based on fiscal 2012 MIP performance target (and up to a 50% match if those performance targets are exceeded). If we do not meet the target, participants receive only a 10% matching credit (or, after the attainment of age 50, up to a 25% matching credit). Because the required performance


28


target was not met, ESP participants received only this non-performance based matching credit for the 2008 plan year.results. Matching employer credits are 50% vested after five years of plan participation and are 100% vested after ten years of plan participation, or at age 55. Of our named executive officers, only Mr. Naylor, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Tripathy were eligible to receive matching credits if they participated in the ESP.55, or upon a change of control or separation from service by reason of death or disability. All amounts deferred or credited to a participant’s account under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other investments available on the market, specified by the plan administrator.market. Although not required by the ESP, it is our practice to purchase the investments specified by participants,notionally invested under the participants’ accounts, thus realizing the actual return of the notional investments.

Under the ESP, amounts deferred are generally distributed uponfollowing termination of employment unless the participant has irrevocably elected an earlier distribution date, which may be no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. Vested employer matching credits are distributed before age 55 upon death disability or separation from service due to disability, at age 55 if a participant has separated for any other reason, or upon a separation from service after attaining age 55. Distributions are generally made in a lump sum payment; however, a participant may irrevocably elect to be paid in annual installments over a period of not more than ten years in the event that theirhis or her employment terminates after age 55. Amounts vested under the ESP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) can be distributed at the participant’s request prior to termination of employment in a lump sum distribution of 85% of the vested account, with the remaining 15% forfeited.

As a resident of the U.K., Mr. Sweetenham was eligible to receive annual performance-based matching credits similar to those provided under the ESP to our eligible U.S. named executive officers but this benefit was forfeited in connection with his departure at the end of fiscal 2012.

Through December 31, 2007, we offered eligible employees includingAssociates (including our U.S. named executive officersofficers) and directors the opportunity to participate in the General Deferred Compensation Plan, or GDCP, another nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Under the GDCP, participants could defer all or a portion of base salary and MIP and LRPIP awards and, in the case of directors, retainers and meeting fees, and bewhich deferrals are credited amounts on deferralswith notional interest at an annually adjusted rate based on a rate foran average yield of Treasury securities that is adjusted annually.during the prior year. For calendar 2008,2011, this rate was 4.58%3.13%. No further deferrals were permitted beginning with fiscal 2009 compensation, but previously deferred amounts continue to be credited with notional interest amounts. GDCP participants who receive a benefit under our Retirement Plan may be eligible to receive a retirement equalization benefit to compensate for the deferral of income. A participant who is already eligible to receive an equalization benefit of the same value under the SERP is not eligible for this benefit.

Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts) that had not been distributed prior to January 1, 2009 are distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 (and earnings on those amounts credited prior to that date) are distributed in a lump sum at termination of service or upon an event or at a date (no later than the tenth anniversary of termination of service) and in a lump sum or in monthly installments as elected by the participant. Upon a change of control, each participant receives the entire amount credited to his deferred account along with the present value of any retirement equalization benefit in a lump sum payment.


29


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2012

The following table provides information on nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our named executive officers as of January 31, 2009, other than Mr. Tripathy who did not elect to participate in the ESP:
                         
  Executive
 Registrant
 Aggregate
 Aggregate
 Aggregate
  
Name and
 Deferrals in
 Matching Credits
 Earnings in
 Withdrawals/
 Balance at
  
Plan Name
 Last FY(1) in Last FY Last FY(3) Distributions Last FYE(4)  
 
Carol Meyrowitz                        
GDCP $0  $0  $20,779  $     0  $523,437     
ESP $292,115  $0  $2,803  $     0  $294,919     
Donald G. Campbell                        
GDCP $0  $0  $6,560  $     0  $165,258     
ESP $118,293  $0  $(306,741) $     0  $1,914,856     
Ernie L. Herrman                        
GDCP $0  $0  $0  $     0  $0     
ESP $0  $0  $1,755  $     0  $489,562     
Arnold S. Barron                        
GDCP $0  $0  $0  $     0  $0     
ESP $138,576  $0  $(446,163)     $715,988     
Jeffrey G. Naylor                        
GDCP $0  $0  $4,965  $     0  $125,086     
ESP $145,230  $9,396(2) $(158,652) $     0  $286,448     
28, 2012:

Name and

Plan Name

  Executive
Contributions in
Last FY(1)
   Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY(2)
   Aggregate
Earnings  in
Last FY(3)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
   Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE(4)
 

Carol Meyrowitz

         

GDCP

  $0    $0    $17,856   $0    $577,260  

ESP

  $271,039    $0    $18,470   $0    $1,310,881  

Ernie L. Herrman

         

GDCP

                        

ESP

  $111,731    $267,155    $88,578   $0    $1,400,692  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

         

GDCP

  $0    $0    $4,267   $0    $137,949  

ESP

  $167,500    $200,524    $(30,195 $0    $1,517,294  

Jerome Rossi

         

GDCP

  $0    $0    $36,555   $0    $1,216,057  

ESP

                        

(1)Also included as Salary or Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation, as applicable, in the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)AlsoIncludes the performance-based matching credits earned for fiscal 2012. The amounts in this column are also included in All Other Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)Reflects notional market-based earnings on deferrals and other amounts deferred bycredited to the account of plan participants. In the case of the ESP, itIt is our practice to purchase the specified notional investments under the ESP, thus realizing the actual market returns on the notional investments.

(4)The aggregate balance includes executive deferrals of income for prior fiscal years. Such deferrals forAmounts deferred by individuals who were named executive officerofficers for the fiscal yearsyear of the deferralsdeferral were included asin the compensation reported for suchthose individuals in the compensation tables in prior proxy statements. The aggregate balance also includes earnings on amounts deferred and performance-based matching credits earned for fiscal 2012 but not credited until after the close of fiscal 2012.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

We believe that providing severance and change of control benefits helps us attract and retain high quality executives and protect our other business interests, as discussed further in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Potential Payments under our Employment and Severance Agreements.Each of our named executive officers duringin fiscal 20092012 was a party to an employment agreement providing for payments in connection with such officer’sthe specified termination or a change of control. Under these agreements, a qualifying termination entitled the executive to salary continuation for a period from twelve to eighteen months plus payments to defray the cost of continued health care coverage and the continuation of an automobile benefit.control events generally described below. In addition, the executive would be entitled to prorated MIP (and/or a full MIP in the case of death or disability) and prorated LRPIP awards based in each case on target award level, plus other amounts (including amounts payable under our other employee benefit plans) that had been earned prior to termination but were unpaid. Termination for cause or a voluntary termination (other than in connection with a forced relocation) would not entitle the executive to these benefits, other than to the payment of certain already accrued and vested amounts. In addition, upon an involuntary termination without cause, or death or disability, Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Campbell would have been fully vested in outstanding stock options and would have been relieved of the service condition with respect to unvested stock awards. Each of these agreements also included a non-competition undertaking with a duration equal to the scheduled severance period (or two years in the case of Mr. Herrman and Mr. Barron) and a two-year non-solicitation undertaking (eighteen months in the case of Ms. Meyrowitz). Our obligation to continue to pay benefits ceased if, during such period following termination, the executive violated these agreements. Except for Mr. Campbell and Mr. Barron, termination of the executive’s employmenthis departure at the end of fiscal 2012 Mr. Sweetenham entered into agreements with TJX and its subsidiary TJX UK that clarified and supplemented the entitlements under his employment agreement term was treatedagreement.

Termination Other than for Cause or Constructive Termination:    For our U.S. named executive officers, if we terminate an executive’s employment other than for cause or the executive terminates employment in connection with a forced relocation of more than forty miles (a “constructive termination”), the executive would be entitled to twenty-four months of continued base salary (for Ms. Meyrowitz, at her fiscal 2011 salary rate) and any automobile allowance; cash payments in an amount sufficient after taxes to cover the cost of any COBRA continuation of health benefits elected by the executive; cash incentive awards under MIP and LRPIP for each uncompleted year or award cycle, if applicable performance goals are met and adjusted to reflect the executive’s period of service during the cycle; and equity awards in accordance with their terms (plus, for Ms. Meyrowitz, acceleration of outstanding and unvested stock options as provided under her agreement).

Under agreements entered into in connection with his departure from TJX, Mr. Sweetenham is also eligible to receive the same amount of severance benefits as described above for U.S. named executive officers (other than Ms. Meyrowitz), except that he is entitled to twelve months of automobile allowance (instead of twenty-four) and is not entitled to health coverage-related payments. Mr. Sweetenham is also eligible under these agreements for an involuntary termination unless we made an offer of continued employment that satisfies conditions specified in the employment agreement and the executive declined the offer.


30


Under the employment agreements in effect at fiscal 2009 year end, if a change of control were to have occurred during fiscal 2009, the executive would have received a cash lump sum payment equal to the executive’s maximum LRPIP award under any award cycles not yet completed, plus the executive’s target award and a prorated award under MIP for theadditional year of the change of control, plus full accelerated vesting of stock awards and stock options. If the executive’s employment were to terminate for various reasons, including by us other than for cause, by the executive for good reason (as defined in the agreement), or by reason of death or disability, by the earlier to occur of the last business day of the twenty-four month period following a change of control and the next to last day of the scheduled contract term, instead of the severance benefits described above, the executive would have been entitled to receive a severance payment equal to two times the higher of the executive’s base salary immediately priorand, in respect of his performance-based restricted stock award scheduled to termination or the changevest in 2012 that was forfeited under plan terms at his departure, a payment of control (offset by any long-term disability benefits), two years of continued medical and life insurance (exceptup to £807,692.31 to the extent of replacement coverage),the performance goals applicable to such award are met. In exchange for these benefits, Mr. Sweetenham agreed to provide transition assistance and a lump sum payment of two years of automobile benefit.gave additional undertakings regarding non-competition, non-solicitation and other covenants and releases. The employment agreements foramounts payable to Mr. Campbell, Mr. Barron and Ms. Meyrowitz also provided for an enhanced benefit to be payable under SERP upon such a termination. We were also obligated to pay the executive a taxgross-up payment to cover certain taxes incurredSweetenham in connection with a change of control and all legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred byhis departure are detailed in the executive in seeking enforcement of the executive’s contractual rights following a change of control. The agreements include terms designed to comply with the deferred compensation provisions of Section 409A of the Code, including provisions that would delay certain termination-related benefits for six months beyond termination of employment and alternative payment provisions that could apply in connection with a change in control not described in Section 409A.
table below.

Death or Disability:    Upon a termination of employment by reason of death or disability, each U.S. named executive officer (or his or her legal representative) would be entitled to the same benefits as are described above, except that salary continuation would be subject to adjustment for any long-term disability benefits and the MIP award would be paid at target without proration.

Voluntary Termination:    Our U.S. named executive officers would not be entitled to these separation benefits upon a voluntary termination (other than a constructive termination), except that if Ms. Meyrowitz voluntarily terminates her employment with 90 days’ notice and prior to a change of

control, she would be entitled to salary continuation, automobile allowance, and health coverage-related payments on the same basis as if she had been involuntarily terminated without cause, as well as prorated LRPIP benefits for any full fiscal years in a cycle completed prior to the date of termination.

End of Contract Term:    For Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, a termination occurring on the last day of the agreement term would be treated as a termination other than for cause (unless, in the case of Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, we make an offer of continued service in a comparable position). Mr. Rossi’s agreement in effect during fiscal 2012 did not entitle him to separation benefits at the end of the agreement term, but under his new employment agreement (effective at the beginning of fiscal 2013) he would be entitled upon termination of employment at the end of the agreement term to a prorated portion of outstanding LRPIP and performance-based restricted stock awards, if applicable performance conditions are met.

Change of Control:    Upon a change of control (with or without a termination of employment), each U.S. named executive officer would be entitled to receive a lump sum settlement at target of MIP and LRPIP awards for which the performance period or cycle had not ended (or, for Mr. Rossi, a lump sum payment equal to his target award and a prorated target award under MIP for the year of the change of control, plus his maximum award for each uncompleted LRPIP cycle), plus any benefits (including any acceleration of awards) under the SIP and our deferred compensation plans. We would also be obligated to pay legal fees and expenses the U.S. named executive officer reasonably incurs in seeking enforcement of contractual rights following a change of control. Under Mr. Rossi’s new employment agreement, he would be entitled to the same MIP- and LRPIP-based payments as described above for the other U.S. named executive officers.

The events that constitute a change of control under the employmentfiscal 2012 agreements for our named executive officers at fiscal 2009 year end generally consistedconsist of the following, subject to the qualifications set forth in those employment agreements: (i) a change of control required to be reported under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; (ii) the acquisition of 20% or more of our common stock followed by a change in at least one-fourtha majority of our board of directors; (iii) a proxy solicitation or solicitations followed by a change in at least one-fourtha majority of our board of directors; and (iv) the execution of certain agreements of acquisition, merger or consolidation followed by if required, shareholder approvalconsummation of the transactions contemplated by such agreement.

Subsequent to our fiscal year end, we agreed with Ms. Meyrowitz, Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor to eliminate their rights to tax gross-up

Change of Control Followed by Qualifying Termination:    Upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change of control, each U.S. named executive officer would be entitled to receive alternative severance benefits instead of the separation-related benefits described above. The alternative severance benefits consist of a lump sum severance payment equal to two times the sum of the executive’s annual base salary (for Ms. Meyrowitz, by reference to her fiscal 2011 salary rate), any annual automobile allowance and (except for Mr. Rossi) target MIP award amount; and two years of continued participation in medical and life insurance programs, except to the extent of replacement coverage. For this purpose, base salary would be adjusted for any long-term disability benefits and the target MIP amount and (except for Ms. Meyrowitz) base salary would be determined by reference to the higher of the executive’s base salary immediately prior to termination or the change of control. Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Rossi would also be entitled to an alternative lump sum SERP benefit determined by using specified actuarial assumptions representing potential early commencement of the benefit. Under his new agreement, Mr. Rossi would be entitled to the same MIP-based payments as described above for the other U.S. named executive officers.

A qualifying termination for certain taxes that might be incurredthese purposes includes a termination by us other than for cause, by the executive for good reason (as defined in connection withthe agreements), or a changetermination by reason of control and to severance benefits upon certain voluntary terminations without good reasondeath or disability, in each case within 24 months following a change of control. A qualifying termination does not include a voluntary termination without good reason. Under the agreement with Mr. Rossi in effect during fiscal 2012 (but not under his new agreement) the qualifying termination would also have to have occurred by the end of agreement term.

In addition to amounts described above, the executives would remain entitled to vested and accrued, but unpaid, compensation and benefits (including earned but unpaid amounts under MIP and LRPIP). Our named executive officers would not be entitled to any tax gross-up payment for any “golden parachute” excise tax on change of control benefits, but payments and benefits to each executive would be reduced if and to increase their severance benefits following an involuntarythe extent such a reduction would have put the executive in a better after-tax position.

Potential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards.    Under the terms of awards granted under our SIP, each of our U.S. named executive officers would be entitled to partial vesting of stock options upon death or disability and full vesting of both stock options and stock awards upon a change of control. Ms. Meyrowitz would also be entitled to full vesting of unvested stock awards upon termination of employment by reason of death or disability. In the event of a termination without cause or a voluntaryconstructive termination, for good reason to twenty-four months. We also agreed to revisionsMs. Meyrowitz’s options vest in full and her stock awards remain subject to the changesatisfaction of control definitionthe applicable performance conditions but applicable service-based conditions would be deemed satisfied. Following a termination of employment at the end of fiscal 2012, the executives would have been able to include a changeexercise vested options in accordance with applicable post-termination exercise periods and Mr. Rossi (had he retired at the end of control required to be reportedfiscal 2012) would have been eligible for continued vesting of his outstanding options, in each case in accordance with the terms described above under the Securities Exchange Act; the acquisition“Grants of 20% or more of our common stock followed by a changePlan-Based Awards in at least a majority of our board of directors; a proxy solicitation or solicitations followed by a change in at least a majority of our board of directors; and the execution of certain agreements of acquisition, merger or consolidation followed by consummation of such agreement.


31

Fiscal 2012” table.


Except with respect to Mr. Tripathy and Mr. Barron, theThe following table sets forth aggregate estimated payment obligations tovalue of the acceleration of unvested equity awards held by each of our named executive officers assuming the triggering events occurred on January 31, 2009,28, 2012, all pursuant to the terms of TJX’s plans and each executive’s awards as in effect on such date. These amounts are also included in the potential payment table below. Mr. Sweetenham’s unvested equity awards were forfeited as of January 28, 2012.

   Triggering Event(1) 
   Death/Disability   Termination without Cause(2)   Change of Control(3) 

Name

  Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
   Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
   Option
Awards
   Stock
Awards
 

Carol Meyrowitz

  $736,185    $8,172,000    $3,243,647    $8,172,000    $3,243,647    $8,172,000  

Ernie L. Herrman

  $507,778                   $2,292,384    $8,215,650  

Jeffrey G. Naylor

  $380,829                   $1,719,084    $5,478,000  

Jerome Rossi

  $380,829                   $1,719,084    $2,466,360  

(1)For purposes of these estimates, we valued performance-based restricted stock and stock options using $33.69, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on January 27, 2012, the last business day of the fiscal year. We included the full value of all accelerated performance-based restricted stock awards ($33.69 per share), plus the value of any accumulated dividends that would have been paid upon the vesting of such awards, and the spread value ($33.69 per share minus the option exercise price) for all stock options that would have been accelerated upon a termination of employment (including by reason of death or disability) or change of control. We did not include any amounts in respect of outstanding equity awards that either were earned based on service and performance as of January 28, 2012, or that would not have accelerated upon the triggering event. See the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2012 Year End” table for more information about these equity awards. We further assumed that each executive would satisfy his or her non-competition, non-solicitation, or confidentiality agreements with us following termination.

(2)Assumes that the performance conditions applicable to Ms. Meyrowitz’s unvested stock awards would have been satisfied.

(3)Assumes that all awards would have been cashed out at closing, and that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A).

Potential Acceleration of Unvested Deferred Compensation.    As noted above under “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans,” unvested employer credit accounts under the ESP also vest in full upon a change of control or termination of employment due to death or disability. Of our named executive officers, only Mr. Naylor had an employer credit account under ESP that was not fully vested as of the end of fiscal 2012.

Related Provisions.    Each U.S. named executive officer agreed to non-solicitation and non-competition provisions that operate during the term of employment and for twenty-four months thereafter, and to confidentiality provisions during and after employment. Benefits under the employment agreements and SERP, as well as benefits attributable to the enhanced employer match under the ESP, are also conditioned on compliance with restrictive covenants. Mr. Naylor agreed to additional restrictive covenants applicable to the stock award granted to him during fiscal 2012, as described above under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2012 Year End.” Mr. Sweetenham agreed to post-employment non-solicitation and non-competition provisions for twenty-four and eighteen months, respectively, under his agreement with TJX and for twelve months under his agreement with TJX UK, as well as post-employment confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions under both agreements. Upon a change of control, our named executive officers would no longer be subject to any covenant not to compete following a termination of employment.

The agreements and plans include terms designed to comply with the deferred compensation provisions of Section 409A, including provisions that would delay certain termination-related benefits for six months beyond termination of employment and alternative payment provisions that could apply in connection with a change of control not described in Section 409A.

The following table sets forth aggregate estimated payment obligations to each of our U.S. named executive officers, assuming that the triggering events had occurred on January 28, 2012, all pursuant to the terms of TJX’s plans and each executive’s employment agreement as in effect on such date (which do not reflect the changes described above)above in Mr. Rossi’s new agreement). PursuantBecause our post-termination obligations to Mr. Sweetenham upon his separation agreement, Mr. Tripathy’s benefits and paymentsdeparture were established as of January 31, 2009. Mr. Barron’s retirement, effective January 31, 2009, entitled him only to those payments and benefits in which he was vested on the date of termination under our various employee benefit programs, including earned and unpaid amounts under our cash and equity-based award programs. Because the Company’s post-termination obligations to Mr. Tripathy and Mr. Barron were established as of January 31, 2009,28, 2012, the table below reflects that no other amounts would have become payable on such date to these named executives upon death/disability, a change of control, a change of control followed by termination or a termination without cause or voluntary termination with good reason.

                         
Triggering Event /Payments
 J. Naylor  D. Campbell  C. Meyrowitz  A. Barron  N. Tripathy(1)  E. Herrman 
 
Death /Disability                        
Severance $1,110,000  $435,675  $2,212,500  $       0  $0  $1,387,500 
MIP and LRPIP  2,144,590   1,710,637   5,161,759   0   0   2,285,535 
Acceleration of Unvested Option Awards  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Acceleration of Unvested Stock Awards  0   388,400   3,107,200   0   0   0 
Medical/Life Insurance  27,244   16,191   36,191   0   0   36,188 
Automobile Benefit  53,856   53,856   53,856   0   0   53,856 
                         
Total $3,335,690  $2,604,759  $10,571,506  $0  $0  $3,763,079 
                         
Termination without Cause /Voluntary Termination with Good Reason                        
Severance $1,110,000  $435,675  $2,212,500  $0  $754,570  $1,387,500 
MIP and LRPIP(2)  1,736,955   1,375,200   3,658,393   0   789,873   1,792,175 
Acceleration of Unvested Option Awards  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Acceleration of Unvested Stock Awards  0   388,400   3,107,200   0   0   0 
Medical/Life Insurance  27,244   16,191   36,191   0   18,162   36,188 
Automobile Benefit  53,856   53,856   53,856   0   29,170   53,856 
                         
Total $2,928,055  $2,269,322  $9,068,140  $0  $1,591,775  $3,269,719 
                         
Change of Control                        
MIP and LRPIP $3,655,100  $2,626,074  $8,369,322  $0  $0  $3,826,550 
Acceleration of Unvested Option Awards  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Acceleration of Unvested Stock Awards  855,723   388,400   3,107,200   0   0   855,723 
TaxGross-up
  0   0   0   0   0   0 
                         
Total $4,510,823  $3,014,474  $11,476,522  $0  $0  $4,682,273 
                         
Change of Control followed by Termination                        
Severance $1,480,000  $580,900  $2,950,000  $0  $0  $1,850,000 
MIP and LRPIP  3,655,100   2,626,074   8,369,322   0   0   3,826,550 
SERP Enhancement  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Acceleration of Unvested Option Awards  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Acceleration of Unvested Stock Awards  855,723   388,400   3,107,200   0   0   855,723 
Medical/Life Insurance  24,332   15,534   31,454   0   0   31,452 
Automobile Benefit  64,407   64,407   64,407   0   0   64,407 
TaxGross-up
  2,129,102   0   0   0   0   0 
                         
Total $8,208,663  $3,675,315  $14,522,383  $0  $0  $6,628,131 
                         


32

only those obligations.


Triggering Event and Payments(1)

 C. Meyrowitz  E. Herrman  J. Naylor  J. Rossi  P. Sweetenham(2) 

Death/Disability

     

Severance

 $3,150,000   $2,200,000   $1,660,000   $1,560,000   $  

MIP/LRPIP(3)

  3,356,667    1,813,333    1,235,000    761,970      

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(4)

  8,908,185    507,778    380,829    380,829      

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

          276,503          

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

  106,779    118,671    106,779    118,671      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total(6)

 $15,521,631   $4,639,782   $3,659,111   $2,821,470   $  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Voluntary Termination with 90 Days Notice

     

Severance

 $3,150,000   $   $   $   $  

LRPIP(3)

  1,376,667                  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

  106,779                  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $4,633,446   $   $   $   $  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Termination without Cause/Constructive

Termination

     

Severance

 $3,150,000   $2,200,000   $1,660,000   $1,560,000   $2,550,000  

MIP/LRPIP(3)

  1,376,667    933,333    700,000    375,000    700,000  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(4)

  11,415,647                  

Health, Life and/or Automobile Benefits

  106,779    118,671    106,779    118,671    35,904  

Additional Payments(7)

                  1,271,184  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $16,049,093   $3,252,004   $2,466,779   $2,053,671   $4,557,088  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change of Control

     

Settlement of MIP/LRPIP

 $2,725,000   $1,950,000   $1,400,000   $1,898,940   $  

Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards(4)

  11,415,647    10,508,034    7,197,084    4,185,444      

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

          276,503          
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total

 $14,140,647   $12,458,034   $8,873,587   $6,084,384   $  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Change of Control followed by Qualifying

Termination

     

Change of Control Benefits (see above)

 $14,140,647   $12,458,034   $8,873,587   $6,084,384   $  

Severance

  7,110,000    3,960,000    2,739,000    1,560,000      

Deferred Compensation Enhancement(5)

  5,413,176                  

Health, Life, and/or Automobile Benefits

  100,917    110,676    100,917    110,677      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total(6)

 $26,764,740   $16,528,710   $11,713,504   $7,755,061   $  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Although Mr. Tripathy resigned, he was entitled to benefits under his separation agreement as if he had been terminated without cause with certain modifications.
(2)Executives are entitled to earned MIP and LRPIP as a result of being employed for the entire fiscal year and not as severance.
We used the following assumptions to calculate these payments:
• We assumed in each case that termination is not for cause, the executive does not violate his or her non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with us following termination, the executive does not receive medical or life insurance coverage from another employer within the relevant severance periods, and the executive does not incur legal fees requiring reimbursement from us. We also assume that any change of control is a “change in control event” under Section 409A.
• In the case of disability or incapacity, we assumed that the executive is not entitled to payment under our long-term disability plan. If for any period an executive receives compensation under a TJX long-term disability plan and severance payments under his or her employment agreement, the executive would be obligated to reimburse us for any aggregate amount in excess of the severance amount listed in the table above, unless such reimbursement would result in reducing the executive’s combined benefit below the level of long-term disability compensation to which he or she is entitled under our long-term disability plan or plans.
• We valued restricted stock and stock options using the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on January 30, 2009, the last business day of the fiscal year, which was $19.42 per share.
• We included the full value of all accelerated stock awards ($19.42 per share) and the spread value ($19.42 per share minus the option exercise price, or zero value if the exercise price is greater than $19.42) for all stock options that are accelerated upon a termination of employment (including by reason of death or disability) or termination of employment and change of control. In the case of a change of control (with or without a termination), we assumed that all such awards would be cashed out at closing. See the table titled “Outstanding Equity Awards at 2009 Fiscal Year-End” for information regarding unvested stock and options awards.
• We used the samefollowing assumptions to calculate the payments set forth in the table:

We assumed in each case that the termination was not for cause; the executive does not violate his or her non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality or other obligations to us following termination; the executive does not receive medical or life insurance coverage from another employer within the relevant periods; and the executive does not incur legal fees requiring reimbursement from us. We also assumed that any change of control would have qualified as a “change in control event” under Section 409A.

For health care benefits, we assumed COBRA continuation for 18 months in the event that an executive (other than Mr. Sweetenham) would be contractually entitled to payments based on the cost of such coverage following a termination of employment.

In the case of payments following termination by reason of disability, the amounts shown assume salary continuation and/or long-term disability payments, coordinated to avoid duplication.

We did not include any amounts in respect of accrued but unpaid base salary or benefits (such as Mr. Sweetenham’s accrued holiday pay included above under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2012), or any amounts in respect of bonuses under MIP and LRPIP for performance periods ending on January 28, 2012 that were earned but remained unpaid as of that date. For additional assumptions applicable to equity awards, see “Potential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards” above.

(2)U.S. dollar amounts payable to Mr. Sweetenham under his agreements are converted to pounds sterling at the rate of $1.56 per pound under the terms of his agreements, except that LRPIP-based amounts will be converted to pounds sterling based on the exchange rate in effect at the end of the performance cycle. Under his agreement with TJX UK, Mr. Sweetenham is eligible for health care benefitssalary continuation for thirteen months and continued automobile allowance for twelve months. Under his agreement with TJX, Mr. Sweetenham is eligible to receive five months of salary continuation starting in March 2013 and the remainder of his severance pay and Additional Payment in two lump sum payments at the close of his non-competition period and non-solicitation period under that we usedagreement.

(3)The amount, for our financial reporting under generally accepted accounting principles.
• We assumed that uponeach executive, includes a termination without cause (or a voluntary termination with good reason), the executive would receive the actual MIP award for fiscal 2009, plus the prorated target award for each open LRPIP cycle ending after January 28, 2012, based on the number of monthsportion of the cycle completed as of January 31, 2009 over 3628, 2012 and assuming target performance, plus, in the actualevent of termination due to death or disability, the target MIP award for fiscal 2012. Proration for purposes of the LRPIP payment due for any LRPIP cycle endingamount would have been determined based on the last daynumber of fiscal 2009. We assumedcompleted months of the cycle or, in the event of Ms. Meyrowitz’s voluntary termination, completed years in the cycle.

(4)See “Potential Acceleration of Unvested Equity Awards” above for additional detail about these amounts.

(5)For Mr. Herrman and Mr. Naylor, the amount represents any unvested portion of the executive’s employer credit account under the ESP that would have vested upon a change of control (with or without a termination),termination due to death or disability. For Ms. Meyrowitz and Mr. Rossi, the executive would receive two times his or her target MIP award for fiscal 2009 and the maximum award for each open LRPIP cycle and the actual LRPIP payment due for any LRPIP cycle ending on the last day of fiscal 2009.
• We includedamount represents the estimated present value of enhanced benefits payableany enhancement under our SERP using the actuarial assumptions specified in their employment agreements in the case of a qualifying termination following a change of control. In addition to the ESP and SERP benefits reflected in this table, our named executive officers were eligible for benefits described above under “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.”

(6)In the event of death on January 28, 2012, the beneficiaries of our U.S. named executive officers would also have been entitled to the following amounts under our management- and executive-level life insurance programs: Ms. Meyrowitz, $975,000; Mr. Herrman, $520,000; Mr. Naylor, $975,000 and Mr. Rossi $975,000. Company-paid amounts for these programs are included and described above under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2012.

(7)• We includedThe amount reflects reimbursement for legal services (as described above under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2012), plus the estimated taxgross-up paymentsadditional payment in respect of Mr. Sweetenham’s forfeited performance-based restricted stock award scheduled to vest in 2012 (as described above under “Termination Other than for Cause or Constructive Termination”).

Although certain amounts in the tables above are subject to reduction if, as a result of change-of-control excise and other taxes, a reduction is needed to maximize an executive’s after-tax benefits, we determined that no mandatory reduction to benefits would apply in the case of a change of control (both with and without a termination). For purposes of calculating the estimated taxgross-up payments, we assumed that all outstandingin-the-money stock options are cashed out at their spread value ($19.42 per share minus the option exercise price) and that anyout-of-the-money stock options are cashed out at zero value. We further assumed that any stock awards are cashed out at full value, except that only a portion of the value of any performance-based stock award with a performance period ending on January 31, 2009 is taken into account for purposes of calculating the present value of the parachute payment attributable to an executive’s equity acceleration. Finally, these


33


figures assume that none of the parachute payments will be discounted as attributable to reasonable compensation.
Upon a termination or a termination and a change of control other than(both with and without a qualifying termination) occurring on January 28, 2012. For purposes of this determination, we assumed that all equity awards would have been cashed out at closing; and that only a portion of the estimated present value of enhanced benefits payable under our SERP, which value is reflected in the table above, our named executive officers, likestock options, performance-based stock awards with performance periods ending on January 28, 2012, accumulated cash dividends with respect to such stock awards, and certain other participants in our Retirement Plan, ESP and GDCP, are eligible for the benefits described in the sections titled “Pension Benefits” and “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans” andpayments, would be entitled to benefits under those plans in accordance with their terms.
Under the employment agreements for each of our named executive officers at fiscal 2009 year end, the executive was generally subject to non-solicitation and non-competition undertakings described above. Uponhave been treated as contingent upon a change of control, those employment agreements provide that the executive is no longer subject to the non-competition undertaking, but the non-solicitation undertaking remains in effect.
control.

Compensation of DirectorsDIRECTORS COMPENSATION

For fiscal 2009,2012, we paid all of our non-employee directors as follows:

Annual retainer of $50,000 for each director.

Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Committee chair.

• Annual

Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director.

Fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended (each day of a multiple day Board meeting is treated as a separate Board meeting with respect to this fee).

Fee of $2,000 for each Committee meeting attended as a Committee member or $2,500 for each regularly scheduled Committee meeting attended as Committee chair (other than, in each case, the Executive Committee).

Two annual deferred stock awards, each representing shares of our common stock valued at $62,500.

Payment of $50,000 for each director.

• Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Committee chair.
• Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director.
• Fee of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended.
• Fee of $2,000 for each Committee meeting attended as a Committee member or $2,500 for each Committee meeting attended as Committee chair.
• Two annual deferred stock awards, each representing shares of our common stock valued at $50,000.
Directors are not paid fees for attendance at special meetings of the Board or committees is at the discretion of the Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director, taking into consideration such matters as deemed relevant by the Chairman of the Board or the Lead Director, as applicable, such as the length of the meeting and committee meetings that are short in duration.preparation time required. Employee directors do not receive separate compensation for their service as directors. The Executive Committee does not receive the committee-specific compensation. Directors are reimbursed for customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings. The deferred stock awards (and deferred dividends on those awards) are granted under our SIP. One of the deferred stock awards vests immediately and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at the earlier of separation from service as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on service as a director untilat the annual meeting next following the award, based on service as a director for that year, and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock upon vesting or, if an irrevocable advance election is made, at the same time as the first award. In the event that a non-employee director separates from service as a director prior to vesting in the second award, suchthat award will be forfeited.

Our non-employee directors wereare eligible to defer their retainers and fees under the ESP in which theybut are not eligible for matching credits. Amounts deferred by directors under the ESP are notionally invested in mutual funds or other investments, available on the market specified by the plan administrator.investments. Participating non-employee directors may select a distribution date earlier than retirement from the Board, but no earlier than January 1st of the second year following the year of the deferral. During fiscal 2012, Mr. Bennett and Ms. Shire participated in the ESP deferral program. Prior to January 1, 2008, our non-employee directors were eligible to defer their retainers and fees in our GDCP, under which amounts deferred continue to earn interest at a periodically adjusted market-based rate. Amounts deferred under the GDCP on or after January 1, 2005 that had not been distributed prior to January 1, 2009 arewill be distributed under the terms of the ESP, as described above. Amounts deferred under the GDCP prior to January 1, 2005 arewill be paid at retirement fromon leaving the Board. OurMr. Bennett and Ms. Shire currently participate in the GDCP. We do not provide retirement or insurance benefits for our non-employee directors.

The following table provides information concerning compensation for our non-employee directors for fiscal 2012. Compensation for Mr. Cammarata as an employee and executive officer of TJX for fiscal 2012 is included below, although it is our policy that employee directors are not paid additional compensation for their service as directors. We doMs. Meyrowitz’s compensation is shown above in the Summary Compensation Table with that of the other named executive officers. Mr. Abdalla was elected to the Board at the beginning of fiscal 2013 so did not provide retirement or insurance benefits for our non-employee directors.


34


The following table provides information concerningreceive compensation for our non-employee directors and for Mr. Cammarata, our Chairman who is an executive officer of TJX, during fiscal 2009.
                             
              Change in
       
              Pension Value and
       
              Non-Qualified
       
  Fees Earned
        Non-Equity
  Deferred
       
  or Paid
  Stock
  Option
  Incentive Plan
  Compensation
  All Other
    
Name
 In Cash  Awards(1),(4)  Awards(1),(4)  Compensation  Earnings(3)  Compensation  Total 
 
José B. Alvarez $96,750  $100,315                $197,065 
Alan M. Bennett $85,750  $100,315                $186,065 
David A. Brandon $112,250  $104,774                $217,024 
Bernard Cammarata(2) $509,616                 $39,087  $548,703 
David T. Ching $105,750  $101,336                $207,086 
Michael F. Hines $117,734  $101,336                $219,070 
Amy B. Lane $119,750  $103,348                $223,098 
John F. O’Brien $159,750  $106,757                $266,507 
Robert F. Shapiro $114,266  $109,566                $223,832 
Willow B. Shire $112,250  $106,202                $218,452 
Fletcher H. Wiley $107,500  $109,367                $216,867 
2012.

Directors Compensation for Fiscal 2012

Name

 Fees Earned
or Paid
In Cash
  Stock
Awards(1)(2)
  Option
Awards(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension Value  and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 

José B. Alvarez

 $88,500   $132,205                   $220,705  

Alan M. Bennett

 $85,764   $132,205                   $217,969  

David A. Brandon(6)

 $35,168   $13,894                   $49,062  

Bernard Cammarata

 $500,000(3)              $68,855(4)  $42,304(5)  $611,159  

David T. Ching

 $84,500   $130,804                   $215,304  

Michael F. Hines

 $101,000   $132,883                   $233,883  

Amy B. Lane

 $98,500   $133,681                   $232,181  

John F. O’Brien

 $140,500   $139,112                   $279,612  

Willow Shire

 $88,000   $139,167                   $227,167  

Fletcher Wiley(6)

 $31,431   $21,924                   $53,355  

(1)Reflects the amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for fiscal 2009 in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). In accordance with SEC rules, these amounts exclude estimatesConsists of forfeituresannual deferred share awards totaling $125,000 and annual credits of additional deferred shares in the caseamount of awards with service-based vesting conditions. There were no stock option awards in fiscal year 2009. Stock awards are valued in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Stock awards are valueddividends accrued on the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date. The underlying valuation assumptions for equity awards are further disclosed in footnote H to our audited financial statements filed with our Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 2009. The grant date fair value for the two deferred stock awards granted to our non-employee directors in fiscal 2009 was $50,000 per award.shares.

(2)Reflects compensation as an executive officer: base salary as Chairman of $509,616, automobile benefit of $35,529, and matching contribution under 401(k) plan of $3,558. Fiscal 2009 was a 53 week year.
(3)The actuarial present value of Mr. Cammarata’s accumulated benefit obligations decreased by $9,331 in fiscal 2009. Our directors did not receive above-market or preferential earnings on non-tax qualified deferred compensation.
(4)The following table shows the number of outstanding shares of deferred stock awards and the number of outstanding shares underlying option awards forof our directors as of January 31, 200928, 2012 other than Ms. Meyrowitz, whose outstanding equity awards are shown with the named executive officers above:
         
  Outstanding
  Outstanding
 
Name
 Stock Awards  Option Awards(a) 
 
José B. Alvarez  5,646   0 
Alan M. Bennett  5,646   0 
David A. Brandon  15,833   0 
Bernard Cammarata  0   450,000 
David T. Ching  6,679   0 
Michael F. Hines  6,679   0 
Amy B. Lane  10,257   7,956 
John F. O’Brien  19,334   68,000 
Robert F. Shapiro  28,592   0 
Willow B. Shire  17,857   68,000 
Fletcher H. Wiley  28,064   36,000 


35

Name

  Outstanding Deferred
Stock Awards(a)
   Outstanding
Option  Awards(b)
 

José B. Alvarez

   27,849       

Alan M. Bennett

   27,849       

David A. Brandon

          

Bernard Cammarata

          

David T. Ching

   21,215       

Michael F. Hines

   29,995       

Amy B. Lane

   30,323     13,912  

John F. O’Brien

   47,515     24,000  

Willow B. Shire

   47,687     72,000  

Fletcher H. Wiley

          


(a)2,521 deferred shares for each director are unvested and will vest on the date of the 2012 Annual Meeting.

(b)All options for Board service were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, hadhave a ten-year term, vestedvest after one year or upon a change of control, and remain exercisable for the term of the option or up to five years after cessation of Board service. Such options terminate upon death, except that upon death within the last year of such five-year period, options remain exercisable for one year following death. Stock option grants for non-employee directors were eliminated in June 2006.

(3)Represents Mr. Cammarata’s option awards were granted to him as an executive officer and had an exercise price equal tosalary under his employment agreement.

(4)Represents the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, had a ten-year term, and vested in equal annual installments over three years, beginning on the anniversary of the grant date, and upon a change of control and some employment terminations.
PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO AND PERFORMANCE TERMS OF
THE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
The Board of Directors believes that equity incentives are important in motivating key associate performance. We have used stock options and other stock-based awards as part of our overall compensation programs for many years to align the interests of our key associates and directors with those of stockholders and to enable us to hire and retain highly-qualified associates and directors. No further awards can be made under our Stock Incentive Plan, referred to as the SIP, after June 2009. On April 7, 2009, the ECC approved an amended and restated SIP; amendments increasing the number of shares available for awards, limiting shares issuable for some types of awards, increasing the maximum value of the annual deferred stock awards for non-employee directors and extending the term of the SIP are subject to stockholder approval. On the same date, the ECC re-approved the performance goals for performance-based awards under the SIP to enable the continued use of tax-efficient stock-based incentive awards. Stockholder approval is also sought for these performance goals and for related material terms, including the SIP’s provisions relating to eligibility for performance awards and its per-individual limits relative to such awards.
The Board of Directors believes that the following provisions of the amended SIP promote the interests of stockholders consistent with principles of good corporate governance:
• Independent Committee.  The SIP will continue to be administered by the ECC, which is composed entirely of independent directors who meet the current NYSE and the Company’s higher standards for independence and who meet the definition of “outside directors” for purposes of the performance-based compensation exemption under Code Section 162(m).
• Plan Limits on Dilution.  The number of shares that will be available for future awards will be the sum of (i) 28 million shares plus (ii) any shares subject to outstanding awards as of January 31, 2009 that are forfeited, expired or satisfied without the issuance of shares. Shares available for future awards will be reduced on aone-for-one basisincrease in the caseactuarial present value of awards of stock optionsMr. Cammarata’s accumulated benefit obligations under our retirement plan. Non-employee directors do not receive retirement benefits. We do not pay above-market or stock appreciation rights or SARs, andpreferential earnings on a1.13-for-one basis in the case of other awards. As of January 31, 2009 we had approximately 413 million shares of our common stock outstanding.
• Aggressive Stock Repurchase Program.  Our Board recognizes that equity incentives, while important to motivate key associates and remain competitive, also represent potential dilution. Our aggressive stock repurchase programs have had the effect of significantly reducing the number of shares of our stock outstanding in the market. We repurchased 23,958,479 shares during fiscal 2009, 79,243,370 shares in the past three fiscal years and 130,276,346 shares in the past five fiscal years, significantly more than the number of shares for which we granted awards under the SIP during those periods.
• Limits on Awards.  The maximum number of shares that we could issue upon the exercise of stock options is 27,500,000, and the maximum number of shares that we could issue upon the exercise of incentive stock options (ISOs) is 27,500,000 less the number of shares issued on exercise of non-deferred compensation.


36


(5)
qualified stock options (NSOs). The numberConsists of shares subject to eachan automobile benefit of the stock options or SARs granted to any participant in any three-year period may not exceed 8,000,000.$35,904, a matching contribution under our 401(k) plan of $4,900 and reimbursement for financial planning of $1,500.

(6)
• No Discounted Stock Options or SARs.  All stock optionMr. Brandon and SAR awards must have an exercise or strike price that isMr. Wiley did not less than the fair market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
• Limits on Vesting of Restricted Stock.  Restricted Stock and all awards other than stock options and SARs may not vest more rapidly thanstand for election in one-third installments over three years unless vesting is subject to the attainment of performance goals or for other limited exceptions.
• No Repricing.  The SIP prohibits, without stockholder approval, any repricing requiring stockholder approval under applicable NYSE rules.
• Performance-Based Awards.  The SIP provides for the grant of performance-based awards intended to qualify for the exemption from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code.
• Maximum Term.  No awards will be permitted to be made under the SIP after June 2, 2019, extending the current term by ten years.2011.
Proposed Amendments to the SIP
Stockholders are being asked to approve the following amendments to the SIP:
• An additional 15,590,495 shares will be available for issuance pursuant to the SIP. For each share issued under a future award that is not a stock option or a SAR, the maximum number of shares remaining available under the SIP will be reduced by 1.13 shares (currently 2.2 shares). For each share of stock issued under a stock option or a SAR, the maximum number of shares remaining available under the SIP will be reduced by one share.
• The number of shares issuable upon the exercise of NSOs is limited to 27,500,000 shares, and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of ISOs is limited to 27,500,000 shares less the number of shares issued upon the exercise of NSOs. Although the SIP permits us to grant ISOs, we have not previously done so.
• Each non-employee director who is elected at our annual shareholder meeting will be awarded two deferred stock awards, each having a value of $100,000 or such lesser dollar amount as the Board of Directors may determine. Although this amendment would increase the maximum value of the annual deferred stock awards that could be granted to our non-employee directors, the Board currently intends to maintain the value of these awards at $50,000 each.
• The term during which awards can be granted under the SIP will be extended to June 2, 2019 from June 30, 2009.
The addition of 15,590,495 shares to the SIP will provide a sufficient number of shares to enable TJX to continue to make awards for several years. As of January 31, 2009, there were 12,409,505 shares available for future awards under the SIP, 31,772,628 shares subject to outstanding stock options, 442,258 shares of restricted stock awards outstanding that have not yet vested, 128,983 shares of deferred stock awards to non-employee directors that have vested but not yet been issued and 15,605 shares of deferred stock awards to non-employee directors that have not yet vested. On January 30, 2009 (the last business day of the fiscal year), the closing price of TJX’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions tape was $19.42.
Shareholders are also being asked to approve the performance goals and other material terms for performance-based awards under the SIP, which are described below under “Performance Awards.” Accordingly, our ability to continue to grant performance-based stock awards under the SIP that would qualify for the exemption from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) of the Code would be extended through the first annual meeting of the Company’s shareholders that occurs in 2014.


37


PROPOSAL 2

Summary of the SIP
The SIP permits the granting of a variety of stock and stock-based awards. The SIP is presently administered by the ECC. Only common stock may be issued under the SIP.
Officers and other key employees of TJX or its subsidiaries who are selected by the ECC are eligible to participate in the SIP. Non-employee directors of TJX, including directors who are former employees of TJX, are also eligible for awards. As of January 31, 2009, we have approximately 6,000 key employees; the ECC currently considers approximately 2,760 persons as eligible to receive awards under the SIP. The SIP limits the maximum term of awards to ten years. If the amendments described above are approved, the date after which no additional awards could be made under the SIP would be June 2, 2019. The total number of shares issuable under the SIP is not reduced by awards and shares which are forfeited, reacquired by TJX or satisfied by a cash payment or otherwise without any common stock being issued.
Stock Options.  The ECC may grant ISOs and NSOs. Persons who are not employees of TJX or a subsidiary are not eligible to receive grants of ISOs. ISOs are non-transferable except at death; NSOs are non-transferable except at death or as provided by the ECC. The ECC expects to limit any such approved transfers to gratuitous transfers (i.e., transfers not for value). The ECC may provide that upon exercise of an option the participant will receive shares free from restrictions or instead will receive shares subject to restrictions, as described below. The ECC determines the exercise price of each option, but the exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of TJX’s common stock on the date of the grant of the option.
The ECC determines the term of each option, which may not exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the time or times each option may be exercised. The ECC may accelerate the exercisability of options at any time. In general, unvested options terminate on termination of employment, and vested options terminate three months following termination of employment or the earlier terms of the options. However, options that were exercisable immediately prior to termination of employment due to normal retirement (at or after age 65 with five years of service), disability or death generally may be exercised for five years following termination or the earlier terms of the options. In addition, options held by persons employed with TJX for at least 20 years who were age 60 or older at retirement or by persons employed by TJX for at least 10 years who were age 65 or older at retirement generally continue to vest for three years following retirement on the same basis as if such persons were still employed, and, once vested, will remain exercisable during the five year period following retirement or until the earlier terms of the options. Upon death during the last year of such post-retirement or post-disability exercise periods, in general, the exercise period is extended to one year following death. If a person’s employment is terminated for cause, his or her options cease to be exercisable.
Holders of options granted under the SIP may pay the full exercise price and any taxes required to be withheld in connection with the exercise by any instrument that the ECC has decided is an acceptable method of payment, or by cashless exercise through a broker. In addition, the ECC may permit holders of options granted under the SIP to pay the exercise price and any applicable withholding taxes by delivering shares of unrestricted common stock, valued at their fair market value on the exercise date at an amount equal to the exercise price of the option plus the applicable withholding amount. If so requested by an option holder in connection with the exercise of his or her option, the ECC may, in its discretion, also pay the option holder the spread in his or her option rather than requiring that the option holder tender the exercise price and receive the full number of shares subject to the option. In addition, the holder of anin-the-money stock option that remains unexercised on the date of expiration will be deemed to have requested a payment of the spread in his or her option, which payment shall be made by the ECC in the form of shares of stock.
No Option Repricing.  Under the SIP, any repricing requiring stockholder approval under applicable NYSE rules may not be accomplished without the required stockholder approval.
Individual Limit on Option Awards.  The SIP limits the number of shares subject to options that can be granted to any participant during any consecutive three-year period commencing after the date of the amendment to 8,000,000 shares.
Stock Appreciation Rights or SARs.  The SIP authorizes the grant of SARs, either alone or in tandem with options. A SAR gives the holder the right upon exercise to receive cash or stock, as the ECC determines,


38


based on appreciation in the value of the stock over the fair market value of the stock at the time of grant or, if granted in tandem with an option, over the exercise price of the option. The SIP limits the number of shares subject to SARs that can be granted to any participant during any consecutive three-year period commencing after the date of the amendment to 8,000,000 shares.
Other Stock-Based Awards.  The SIP authorizes the ECC to award shares of restricted stock, which are non-transferable shares of common stock subject to restrictions. The ECC may accelerate the vesting of restricted stock at any time. Except as provided in the award and taking into account any accelerated vesting upon termination, if the employment of a participant holding shares of restricted stock is terminated for any reason (including death) prior to the lapse or waiver of the restrictions on his or her restricted stock, we may repurchase the shares for the price paid for the shares, if any, or require the participant to forfeit the shares.
The ECC may also grant unrestricted stock, stock deliverable on a deferred basis, and other awards of, or based on, common stock, subject to such terms and conditions as the ECC may determine. A recipient of any of these awards, including a restricted stock award, will have the rights of a stockholder only as to shares (including restricted shares) actually delivered under the award.
Non-employee Director Awards.  The SIP provides for the award of deferred stock awards, which are unfunded and unsecured promises to deliver shares of stock at a future date, to non-employee directors. Under the SIP, on the date of each annual shareholder meeting, each non-employee director who is elected a director at such meeting will be awarded two deferred stock awards, each having a value of $100,000 or such lesser dollar amount as the Board of Directors may determine. The Board currently intends to maintain the value of these awards at $50,000 each. In the event that a non-employee director is first elected a director on a date other than TJX’s annual shareholder meeting, the two awards are made on that date and are prorated based on the number of days remaining until the next scheduled annual meeting. The first of the deferred stock awards vests immediately and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at the earlier of separation from service as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on service as a director until the annual meeting next following the award and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock upon vesting or, if an irrevocable advance election is made, at the same time as the first award. If a non-employee director separates from service as a director prior to vesting in the second award, such award will be forfeited.
Performance Awards.  The ECC may grant non-transferable performance awards consisting of cash, shares of TJX’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares. The ECC determines the conditions to which the performance awards are subject, such as the achievement of specified performance goals over a fixed period of time. The ECC may grant performance awards by themselves or in connection with stock options or other awards under the SIP. Persons eligible for performance awards are those persons described above as eligible to participate in the SIP generally under “Summary of the SIP”.
Under the SIP, the ECC may not grant performance awards to any participant during any three-year period of more than 8,000,000 shares of common stock. The SIP also requires that awards intended to qualify for the Code Section 162(m) exemption be based on attainment of performance goals established by the ECC, which must be based on any one or more of the following performance criteria: sales, revenues, assets, or expenses; earnings, income or margins, before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a continuing operations or aggregate or per share basis; return on investment, capital, assets, sales or revenues; and stock price; in each case with such inclusions thereto or exclusions therefrom as the ECC may determine in a manner consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code. In determining whether a performance goal based on one or more of these criteria has been satisfied for any period, any extraordinary item, change in generally accepted accounting principles, or change in law (including regulations) that would affect the determination as to whether such performance goal had been achieved will automatically be disregarded or taken into account, whichever would cause such performance goal to be more likely to be achieved, and to the extent consistent with the Code Section 162(m) exemption the ECC may provide for other objectively determinable and non-discretionary adjustments, in each case with such inclusions thereto or exclusions therefrom as the ECC may determine in a manner consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code. The ECC may reduce or eliminate a performance award (including, without limitation, by restricting vesting under any such award) that would otherwise be deemed to have been earned.


39


Dividends and Deferrals.  Except as may otherwise be determined by the ECC, the right to payment of dividends paid on awards under the SIP and amounts equal to dividends which would have been paid if shares subject to an award had been outstanding is treated as unvested so long as the related awards remain unvested. Any dividend and dividend equivalent amounts related to an award under the SIP are accumulated and paid to participants, if at all, on or within 30 days following the date such award vests. The ECC may permit participants to make elections to defer the receipt of benefits under the SIP. The ECC may also provide for the accrual of interest or dividends on amounts deferred under the SIP on such terms as the ECC may determine.
Adjustments.  The ECC is required to make appropriate adjustments in connection with outstanding awards to reflect stock dividends, stock splits and similar events and extraordinary dividends, distributions or restructurings. The number of shares available under the SIP and share limits are similarly subject to adjustment. In the event of a merger, liquidation or similar event, the ECC in its discretion may provide for conversions, replacements or adjustments or may accelerate or, upon payment or other consideration for the vested portion of any awards as the ECC deems equitable in the circumstances, terminate such awards (subject to the provisions described under “Change of Control” below).
Amendment and Termination.  The Board of Directors or the ECC may at any time amend or discontinue the SIP, and the ECC may at any time amend or cancel awards for the purpose of satisfying changes in the law or for any other lawful purpose. However, no such action may materially adversely affect any rights under outstanding awards without the holder’s consent. The SIP requires stockholder approval for amendments that would result in a reduction in the exercise price of options or that would jeopardize the qualification of an award intended to qualify (and to continue to qualify) as an incentive stock option or as exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.
ChangeofControl.  The SIP provides that, in the event of a change of control of TJX, unless otherwise expressly provided at the time of grant, all stock options will become immediately exercisable and restrictions and conditions on other awards, including conditions on the vesting of shares and the exchange or conversion of securities for common stock, will automatically be deemed satisfied. In addition, at any time prior to or after a change of control, the ECC may accelerate awards and waive conditions and restrictions on any awards to the extent it may determine to be appropriate.
Federal Tax Effects
The following is a summary of some of the federal income tax consequences of the issuance and receipt of options under the SIP under current federal tax laws.
ISOs.  In general, an optionee realizes no taxable income upon the grant or exercise of an ISO. However, the exercise of an ISO may result in an alternative minimum tax liability to the optionee. With some exceptions, a disposition of shares purchased under an ISO within two years from the date of grant or within one year after exercise produces ordinary income to the optionee (and a deduction to TJX) equal to the value of the shares at the time of exercise less the exercise price. Any additional gain recognized in the disposition is treated as a capital gain for which TJX is not entitled to a deduction. If the optionee does not dispose of the shares until after the expiration of these one and two-year holding periods, any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale is treated as a long-term capital gain or loss for which TJX is not entitled to a deduction.
NSOs.  In general, in the case of an NSO, the optionee has no taxable income at the time of grant but realizes income in connection with exercise of the option in an amount equal to the excess (at time of exercise) of the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise over the exercise price. A corresponding deduction is available to TJX. Upon a subsequent sale or exchange of the shares, any recognized gain or loss is treated as a capital gain or loss for which TJX is not entitled to a deduction.
In general, an ISO that is exercised more than three months after termination of employment (other than termination by reason of death) is treated as an NSO. ISOs are also treated as NSOs to the extent they first become exercisable by an individual in any calendar year for shares having a fair market value (determined as of the date of grant) in excess of $100,000.


40


Stock options, SARs and performance-based awards under the SIP are intended to be eligible for the performance-based compensation exemption under Section 162(m) of the Code.
Under the Code, the vesting or accelerated exercisability of options and other awards in connection with a change of control of a corporation may be required to be valued and taken into account in determining whether participants have received compensatory payments, contingent on the change in control, in excess of certain limits. If these limits are exceeded, a substantial portion of amounts payable to the participant, including income recognized by reason of the grant, vesting or exercise of awards, may be subject to an additional 20% federal tax and may be non-deductible to the corporation.
SIP Benefits
The ECC has full discretion to determine the number and amount of awards to be granted to employees under the SIP, subject to the three-year limitation on the total number of awards that may be granted to any employee and other limits under the SIP. Therefore, the future benefits or amounts that would be received by the executive officers and the groups named in the table below under the SIP are not determinable at this time. The following table shows the awards that were granted to such executive officers and groups under the SIP during TJX’s 2009 fiscal year.
         
  Restricted
  
  Stock Awards
 Stock Options
Name and Position
 (# of Shares) (# of Shares)
 
Carol Meyrowitz  60,000   102,630 
President and Chief Executive Officer        
Donald G. Campbell  0   68,430 
Vice Chairman        
Arnold S. Barron  0   51,330 
Senior Executive Vice President, Group President        
Ernie L. Herrman  12,188   68,430 
Senior Executive Vice President, Group President        
Jeffrey G. Naylor  12,188   51,330 
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative and Business Development Officer        
Nirmal K. Tripathy  7,800   25,670 
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer        
Executive Officer Group  109,076   449,960 
Non-Executive Director Group  0   0 
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group  63,465   4,749,420 
Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2, Approval of Amendments to and Performance Terms of the Stock Incentive Plan.


41


PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending January 30, 2010.February 2, 2013. We are asking stockholders to ratify this appointment. Representatives of PwC will attend the 2009 Annual Meeting, where they will have the opportunity to make a statement if they wish to do so and will be available to answer questions from the stockholders.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3,2, Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

PROPOSAL 3

APPROVAL OF MATERIAL TERMS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PERFORMANCE GOALS

UNDER CASH INCENTIVE PLANS

We are seeking approval of the material terms of performance goals of our cash incentive plans, MIP and LRPIP, as they apply to our executive officers.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally provides that compensation provided to a publicly held corporation’s CEO or any of its three most highly paid named executive officers (other than its CEO or CFO) is not deductible by the corporation for U.S. income tax purposes for any taxable year to the extent it exceeds $1 million. This limitation does not apply to compensation that qualifies as exempt performance-based compensation by meeting certain requirements under Section 162(m), including the requirement that the material terms of the related performance goals be disclosed to and approved by shareholders every five years. Under Section 162(m), the material terms include the class of eligible employees, a description of the business criteria on which the performance goals may be based and the maximum amount that can be paid to any participant for a specified period. Although shareholder approval is one of the requirements for exemption under Section 162(m), even with shareholder approval there can be no guarantee that compensation will be treated as exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Our stockholders last approved the material terms of MIP and LRPIP performance goals at our Annual Meeting in 2007. Those terms will continue to apply to outstanding MIP and LRPIP awards. The ECC amended MIP and LRPIP in April 2012 to expand the available business criteria on which future performance goals may be based and to increase the award maximum per participant for future awards, as described below.

We now seek approval of the material terms of MIP and LRPIP performance goals to enable us to provide exempt performance-based compensation under these programs. As discussed above in Tax and Accounting Considerations in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” notwithstanding stockholder approval of these performance goals, the ECC will continue to have authority to provide compensation that is not exempt from the limits on deductibility under Section 162(m).

Overview.    MIP and LRPIP are both administered by the ECC, which consists solely of outside directors. Awards consist of individual award opportunities and related performance targets for a specified performance period, typically one year for MIP and three years for LRPIP. For awards intended to qualify as exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), objectively determinable performance goals and payout formulas are pre-established by the ECC for each performance period. After completion of the performance period, the ECC reviews and certifies performance results and the payout for the awards. Once award terms have been established, the Section 162(m) exemption rules generally prohibit discretionary adjustments, other than

adjustments to reduce any amount payable under the award. Amounts payable under the amended MIP and LRPIP performance goals described in this proposal will be based on future award opportunities and performance and are not determinable at this time. For a description of prior MIP and LRPIP awards for our named executive officers, see the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and related compensation tables, above.

Eligibility and Participation.    Awards under MIP and LRPIP may be granted to executive officers selected from time to time by the ECC and to other key employees of TJX and its subsidiaries selected from time to time by the ECC or its authorized delegate. Currently, approximately 3,400 Associates participate in these plans, including our executive officers.

Business Criteria for MIP and LRPIP Performance Goals.    For each award granted under MIP and LRPIP that is intended to qualify as exempt performance-based compensation, the performance goals set by the ECC will be one or more objectively determinable measures of performance relating to any one or any combination of the following business criteria (measured on an absolute basis or relative to one or more comparators, including one or more companies or indices, and determined on a consolidated, divisional, line of business, project, geographical or area of executive’s responsibilities basis, or any combination thereof):

Sales, revenues, or comparable store sales;

Assets, inventory levels, inventory turns, working capital, cash flow or expenses;

Earnings, profit, income, losses or margins, before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent, or such other items as the ECC may determine at the time the performance goals are pre-established, whether or not on a continuing operations and aggregate or per share basis, basic or diluted, before or after dividends;

Return on investment, capital, equity, assets, sales or revenues, or economic value added models or equivalent metrics;

Market share, store openings or closings, customer service or satisfaction levels, or employee recruiting, retention or diversity;

Stock price, dividends, or total shareholder return, or credit ratings; or

Strategic plan implementations.

The ECC may provide for automatic adjustments (in measures of achievement, amounts payable, or other award terms) to reflect objectively determinable events (for example, acquisitions, divestitures, extraordinary items, other unusual or non-recurring items and/or changes in accounting principles) that may affect the business criteria, any such adjustment to be established and administered in a manner consistent with the requirements for exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).

Maximum Awards.    Under the amended plans, the maximum amount payable to any participant under MIP for any fiscal year, and the maximum amount payable to any participant under LRPIP for one or more performance cycles beginning in a single fiscal year, is $5 million, increased by 5% per year starting with our fiscal year ending February 1, 2014 (fiscal 2014).

Performance-based awards under our MIP and LRPIP are an important part of our compensation system. We rely on them to attract and retain our management. In order to preserve our ability to make tax deductible awards under MIP and LRPIP, we are seeking your approval of the material terms of the performance goals described above.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR Proposal 3, Approval of Material Terms of Executive Officer Performance Goals under Cash Incentive Plans.

PROPOSAL 4

ADVISORY APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 15 of this Proxy Statement describes our executive compensation program and the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal 2012. The Board of Directors is asking stockholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote indicating their approval of that compensation by voting FOR the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. APPROVE, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to its named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion.”

As described in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we have a total compensation approach focused on performance-based incentive compensation that seeks to:

attract and retain very talented individuals in the highly competitive retail environment, maintaining an extremely high talent level in our company and providing for succession broadly across our management,

reward objectively determinable achievement of the short- and long-term financial objectives reflected in our business plans, and

enhance shareholder value by directly aligning the interests of our executives and stockholders.

The Board is asking stockholders to support this proposal. We believe TJX’s performance demonstrates the effectiveness of our compensation program. We received a strong supporting vote last year (more than 97% of votes cast) expressing support for our compensation policies and practices and believe our program continues to be effective. We continue to focus on pay for performance in our compensation program, as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which we encourage you to review. Although the vote we are asking you to cast is non-binding, the ECC and the Board value the views of our stockholders. As with the results last year, the Board and Executive Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of this vote when determining future compensation arrangements for our named executive officers. Our Board of Directors currently intends to conduct an annual advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation each year until the next advisory vote on the frequency of our say on pay advisory votes is held, which will be no later than the annual meeting of the stockholders in 2017.

Your Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 4, Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation.

VOTING REQUIREMENTS AND PROXIES

The nominees receiving a majority of votes properly cast at the meeting will be elected directors. Under our Corporate Governance Principles, any nominee for director must provide the Secretary of the Company an irrevocable contingent resignation prior to the distribution of proxy solicitation materials for the meeting at which such director is expected to be nominated to stand for election. Such resignation will be effective only if such director fails to receive a majority of the votes cast in an uncontested election, as provided in the by-laws, and the Board accepts such resignation. All other proposals require the approval of the majority of votes properly cast.

If you vote your shares by mail, telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted in accordance with your directions. If you do not indicate specific choices when you vote by mail, telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted for the election of the director nominees for approval of amendments to and performance terms of the Stock Incentive Plan, and(Proposal 1), for the ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm.firm (Proposal 2), for the approval of material terms of executive officer performance goals under cash incentive plans (Proposal 3) and for the advisory approval of the company’s executive compensation (Proposal 4). The persons named as proxies will also be able to vote your shares at postponed or adjourned meetings. If any nominee should become unavailable, your shares will be voted for another nominee selected by the Board or for only the remaining nominees. Brokers are not permitted to vote your shares with respect to approval of amendments to and performance termson any matter other than the ratification of the Stock Incentive Planindependent registered public accounting firm

(Proposal 2) without instructionsinstruction from you. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee and you do not instruct the broker or nominee how to vote your shares with respect to the approvalelection of amendments to and performance terms of the Stock Incentive Plandirectors or Proposals 3 or 4, or if you abstain or withhold authority to vote on any matter, your shares will not be counted as having been voted on that matter, but will be counted as in attendance at the meeting for purposes of a quorum.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

A stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20102013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in theour proxy materials for that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to us so that we receive it no later than December 28, 2009.

2012. A stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20102013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders but does not wish the proposal to be included in theour proxy materials for that meeting must provide written notice of the proposal to us notno earlier than February 13, 2013 and no later than March 4, 2010.15, 2013. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Our by-laws, which are available atwww.tjx.com, describe the requirements for submitting proposals at the Annual Meeting. A stockholder who wishes to nominate a director at the 20102013 Annual Meeting must notify us in writing no earlier than February 2, 201013, 2013 and no later than March 4, 2010.15, 2013. The notice must be given in the manner and must include the information and representations required by our by-laws.


42


OTHER MATTERS

At the time of mailing of this proxy, we do not know of any other matter that may come before the Annual Meeting and do not intend to present any other matter. However, if any other matters properly come before the meeting or any adjournment, the persons named as proxies will have discretionary authority to vote the shares represented by the proxies in accordance with their own judgment, including the authority to vote to adjourn the meeting.

We will bear the cost of solicitation of proxies. We have retained Morrow & Co., Inc. to assist in soliciting proxies by mail, telephone and personal interview for a fee of $10,000,$11,000, plus expenses. Our officers and employeesother Associates may also assist in soliciting proxies in those manners.


43


DIRECTIONS TO TJX CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

770 Cochituate Road

Appendix A
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(2009 Restatement)

Framingham, MA 01701


From Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike


THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
(2009 Restatement)
SECTION 1.NAME; EFFECTIVE DATE; GENERAL PURPOSE
     The nameAfter the tollbooth, bear left on the exit ramp across an overpass and onto Route 30 / Cochituate Road. At the second set of the plan islights, turn left into The TJX Companies, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)facility.

From Logan International Airport (From the East)

Leaving the Airport, follow the signs for the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W). The Plan is an amendment and restatement of The TJX Companies, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan as most recently previously amended in 2006. The provisions ofFollow the Plan as herein amended and restated shall applyMassachusetts Turnpike West for approximately 20 miles to Awards made after January 31, 2009 (the “Adoption Date”), except thatexit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the definition of “Change of Control” as set forth herein shall apply to all Awards outstandingdirections above for“From Exit 13 on the Adoption Date andMassachusetts Turnpike.”

From the clarifications and related rules set forth herein that are relatedWest

Take Massachusetts Turnpike East (I-90E) to Section 409A ofexit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the Code shall apply effective as of January 1, 2008.

     The purpose ofdirections above for“From Exit 13 on the Plan isMassachusetts Turnpike.”

From the North

Take I-95 South to secureexit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike I-90). Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above for The “From Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.”

From the South

Take I-95 North to exit 25 (Massachusetts Turnpike). Take the Massachusetts Turnpike West (I-90W) approximately 6.5 miles to exit 13 (Framingham/Natick). Follow the directions above for“From Exit 13 on the Massachusetts Turnpike.”

Parking

TJX Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) and its stockholdersoffers free parking. Follow the benefit of the incentives inherent in stock ownership and the receipt of incentive awards by selected key employees and directors of the Company and its Subsidiaries who contribute to and will be responsible for its continued long term growth. The Plan is intended to motivate such individuals to enhance the long-term value of the Company by providing an opportunity for capital appreciation and to recognize services that contribute materiallyparking lot directory signage to the successvisitor parking areas.

Building Entrance

Enter the building through the Northeast Entrance (facing the Massachusetts Turnpike (I-90)).

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.

We encourage you to take advantage of the Company. Capitalized terms used in the Plan shall have the meaning set forth in Section 14.

SECTION 2.PLAN ADMINISTRATION
     The Plan shall be administered by the Executive Compensation Committee of the BoardInternet or such other committee of the Board as the Board may from time to time determine (the “Committee”). The Committee shall consist of not fewer than two directors, each of whom is bothtelephone voting.

Both are available 24 hours a Non-Employee Directorday, 7 days a week.

Internet and an Outside Director. If at any time the Committee shall include one or more members whotelephone voting are not Non-Employee Directors or Outside Directors, a subcommittee consisting solely of two or more individuals who are both Non-Employee Directors and Outside Directors shall constitute the Committee for purposes of the immediately preceding sentence. If at any time no Committee shall be in office, the functions of the Committee shall be exercised by the Board.

     The Committee shall have the power and authority to: grant Awards consistent with the terms of the Plan, including the power and authority to select from among those eligible the persons to whom Awards may from time to time be granted; determine the time or times of grant of any Awards; to determine the number of shares to be covered by any Award; determine the terms and conditions of any Award; adopt such rules, guidelines and practices for administration of the Plan and for its own acts and proceedings as it shall deem advisable; interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any Award; prescribe such forms and agreements as it deems advisable in connection with any Award; make all determinations it deems advisable for the administration of the Plan; decide all disputes arising in connection with the Plan; and otherwise

-2-


supervise the administration of the Plan. All decisions and interpretations of the Committee shall be binding on all persons, including the Company and Participants.
SECTION 3.SHARES ISSUABLE UNDER THE PLAN; MERGERS; SUBSTITUTION.
     (a) Shares Issuable. The maximum number of shares of Stock (“Share Limit”) that may be issued under Awards shall be the sum of (i) 28,000,000 plus (ii) the number of shares of Stock subject to Awards outstanding as of the Adoption Date. For the avoidance of doubt, if a New Award is forfeited, expires, or is satisfied without the issuance of Stock, the shares of Stock subject to such New Award shall not be treated as issued for purposes of the preceding sentence. Each share issued under a New Award that is a Stock Option or SAR shall reduce the Share Limit by one (1) share, and each share of Stock issued under any other New Award (unless reacquired by the Companyavailable through forfeiture) shall reduce the Share Limit by one and thirteen one-hundredths (1.13) shares. Subject to the Share Limit, no more than 27,500,000 shares of Stock in the aggregate may be issued pursuant to NSOs, and no more than 27,500,000 shares of Stock (less the number of shares issued pursuant to NSOs) in the aggregate may be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs. The number of shares of Stock subject to each of Stock Options, SARs and Performance Awards that may be awarded to any Participant during any consecutive three-year period commencing after the Adoption Date shall be limited to 8,000,000 shares each. Shares issued under the Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or shares reacquired by the Company. The Company shall appropriately reserve shares in connection with the grant of Awards to reflect the limitations set forth above.
     (b) Stock Dividends, Mergers, etc. In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split or similar change in capitalization, or extraordinary dividend or distribution or restructuring transaction affecting the Stock, the Committee shall make appropriate adjustments in the number and kind of shares of stock or securities on which Awards may thereafter be granted, including the limits described in Section 3(a) and Section 7(c), and shall make such adjustments in the number and kind of shares remaining subject to outstanding Awards, and the option or purchase price in respect of such shares as it may deem appropriate with a view toward preserving the value of outstanding awards. In the event of any merger, consolidation, dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the Committee in its sole discretion may, as to any outstanding Awards, make such substitution or adjustment in the aggregate number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan and in the number and purchase price (if any) of shares subject to such Awards as it may determine, or accelerate, amend or terminate such Awards upon such terms and conditions as it shall provide (which, in the case of the termination of the vested portion of any Award, shall require payment or other consideration which the Committee deems equitable in the circumstances), subject, however, to the provisions of Section 12.
     (c) Substitute Awards. The Company may grant Awards under the Plan in conversion, replacement or adjustment of outstanding options or other equity-based compensation awards held by employees of another corporation who become employees or Eligible Directors of the Company or a Subsidiary as described in the first sentence of Section 4 as the result of a merger or consolidation of the employing corporation or an affiliate with the Company or a Subsidiary or the acquisition by the Company or a Subsidiary of stock of the employing corporation or an

-3-


affiliate. The Committee may direct that the converted, replacement or adjusted awards be granted on such terms and conditions as the Committee considers appropriate in the circumstances to reflect the transaction. The shares which may be delivered under such substitute Awards shall be in addition to the limitations set forth in Section 3(a)11:59 PM Eastern Time on the number of shares available for issuance under Awards, and such substitute Awards shall not be subject to the per-Participant Award limits described in Section 3(a).
SECTION 4.ELIGIBILITY.
     Participants in the Plan will be (i) such full or part time officers and other key employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries who are selected from time to time by the Committee in its sole discretion, and (ii) Eligible Directors. Persons who are not employees of the Company or a subsidiary (within the meaning of Section 424 of the Code) shall not be eligible to receive grants of ISOs.
SECTION 5.DURATION OF AWARDS; TERM OF PLAN.
     (a) Duration of Awards. Subject to Sections 13(a) and 13(e) below, no Stock Option or SAR may remain exercisable beyond 10 years from the grant date, and no other Award shall have a vesting or restriction period that extends beyond 10 years from the grant date, except that deferrals elected by Participants of the receipt of Stock or other benefits under the Plan may extend beyond such date.
     (b) Latest Grant Date. No Award shall be granted after June 2, 2019, but then outstanding Awards may extend beyond such date.
SECTION 6.STOCK OPTIONS; SARs.
     Any Stock Option or SAR granted under the Plan shall be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve. Stock Options granted under the Plan may be either ISOs or NSOs. Any Stock Option that is not expressly designated as an ISO at time of grant shall be deemed to have been expressly designated at time of grant as an NSO. Anything in the Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, no term of this Plan relating to ISOs shall be interpreted, amended or altered, nor shall any discretion or authority granted to the Committee under the Plan be exercised, so as to disqualify the Plan or, without the consent of the optionee, any ISO under Section 422 of the Code.
     Stock Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 6(a) through Section 6(k) below; SARs shall be subject to the provisions of Section 6(l) below; and Stock Options and SARs shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Committee shall deem desirable:
     (a) Option Price. The option price per share of Stock purchasable under a Stock Option shall be determined by the Committee at the time of grant but shall be not less than 100% of Fair Market Value on the date of grant.

-4-


     (b) Exercisability. Stock Options shall be exercisable at such time or times, whether or not in installments, as shall be determined by the Committee at or after the grant date. The Committee may at any time accelerate the exercisability of all or any portion of any Stock Option.
     (c) Method of Exercise. The person holding a Stock Option may exercise the Stock Option in whole or in part by means of such exercise procedures as the Committee may from time to time establish, each of which shall require, as the Committee determines, delivery to the Committee of the full purchase price plus (as provided in Section 13(d)) any taxes required to be withheld in connection with the exercise, or delivery of an unconditional and irrevocable undertaking by a broker to deliver promptly to the Company sufficient funds to pay such purchase price and taxes, for the portion of Stock Option so exercised. If so permitted by the Committee in its discretion and subject to such limitations and restrictions as the Committee may impose, payment in full or in part of the exercise price or payment of withholding taxes (as provided in Section 13(d)) may also be made in the form of shares of Stock not then subject to restrictions under any Company plan. The person holding a Stock Option shall have the rights of a shareholder only as to shares acquired upon the exercise of a Stock Option and not as to unexercised Stock Options.
     (d) Non-transferability of Options. No ISO (and, except as determined by the Committee, no NSO) shall be transferable by the person to whom such Stock Option was granted otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and all ISOs (and, except as determined by the Committee, all NSOs) shall be exercisable during the lifetime of the person to whom such Stock Options were granted only by such person. Transfers, if any, permitted by the Committee in the case of NSOs shall be limited to gratuitous transfers (transfers not for value). Where an NSO is permitted by the Committee to be transferred, references in the Plan to the “person to whom the Stock Option was granted” and similar terms shall be construed, as the Committee in its discretion deems appropriate, to include any permitted transferee to whom the Stock Option is transferred.
     (e) Termination by Death. If the employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries of a person to whom a Stock Option was granted terminates by reason of death, the Stock Option may thereafter be exercised, to the extent exercisable immediately prior to death (or on such accelerated or other basis as the Committee shall at any time determine), by the legal representative or legatee of the decedent, for a period of five years (or such shorter period as the Committee shall specify at time of grant) from the date of death or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier.
     (f) Termination by Reason of Disability. If the employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries of a person to whom a Stock Option was granted terminates by reason of Disability, or if such person has been designated an inactive employee by reason of Disability, any Stock Option previously granted to such person may thereafter be exercised to the extent it was exercisable immediatelyday prior to the earlier of such termination or such designation (or on such accelerated or other basis as the Committee shall at any time determine prior to such termination or designation), by the person to whom the Stock Option was granted or, in the event of his or her death following termination, by his or her legal representative or legatee, for a period of five

-5-

annual meeting.


years (or such shorter period as the Committee shall specify at time of grant) from the date of such termination of employment or designation or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee at the time of grant, the death during the final year of such exercise period of the person to whom such Stock Option was granted shall, if such person still holds such Stock Option, extend such period for one year following death or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. The Committee shall have the authority to determine whether a Participant has been terminated or designated an inactive employee by reason of Disability and the date of such termination or designation.
     (g) Termination by Reason of Normal Retirement. If the employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries of a person to whom a Stock Option has been granted terminates by reason of Normal Retirement, the Stock Option may thereafter be exercised to the extent that it was then exercisable immediately prior to such termination (or on such accelerated or other basis as the Committee shall at any time determine), by the person to whom the Stock Option was granted or, in the event of his or her death following Normal Retirement, by his or her legal representative or legatee, for a period of five years (or such shorter period as the Committee shall specify at time of grant) from the date of Normal Retirement or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee at the time of grant, the death during the final year of such exercise period of the person to whom such Stock Option was granted shall extend such period for one year following death, subject to termination on the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier.
     (h) Termination by Reason of Special Service Retirement. If the employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries of a person to whom a Stock Option has been granted terminates by reason of a Special Service Retirement, the Stock Option may thereafter be exercised (to the extent exercisable from time to time during the extended exercise period as hereinafter determined), by the person to whom the Stock Option was granted or, in the event of his or her death following the Special Service Retirement, by his or her legal representative or legatee, for a period of five years (or such shorter period as the Committee shall specify at time of grant) from the date of the Special Service Retirement or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee at the time of grant, the death during the final year of such exercise period of the person to whom such Stock Option was granted shall extend such period for one year following death or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. A Stock Option that is outstanding but not yet fully exercisable at the date of the Special Service Retirement of the person to whom the Stock Option was granted shall continue to become exercisable, over the period of three years following the Special Service Retirement Date (subject to the stated term of the option, or on such accelerated or other basis as the Committee shall at any time determine), on the same basis as if such person had not retired.
     (i) Other Termination. If the employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries of a person to whom a Stock Option has been granted terminates for any reason other than death, Disability, Normal Retirement, Special Service Retirement or for Cause, the Stock Option may thereafter be exercised to the extent it was exercisable on the date of termination of employment (or on such accelerated basis as the Committee shall determine at or after grant) for a period of three months (or such other period up to three years as the Committee shall specify at or after

-6-


grant), by the person to whom the Stock Option was granted or, in the event of his or her death following termination, by his or her legal representative or legatee, from the date of termination of employment or until the expiration of the stated term of the option, if earlier. If the employment of such person terminates or is terminated for Cause, the unexercised portion of any Stock Option previously granted to such person shall immediately terminate.
     (j) Form of Settlement. Subject to Section 13(a) and Section 13(e) below, shares of Stock issued upon exercise of a Stock Option shall be free of all restrictions under the Plan, except as provided in the following sentence. The Committee may provide at time of grant that the shares to be issued upon the exercise of a Stock Option shall be in the form of Restricted Stock, or may reserve the right to so provide after time of grant.
     (k) Discretionary Payments; Automatic Exercise. The Committee may, in its discretion, upon the written request of the person exercising a Stock Option (which request shall not be binding on the Committee, except as hereinafter provided), cancel such Stock Option, whereupon the Company shall pay to the person exercising such Stock Option an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the Fair Market Value of the Stock to have been purchased pursuant to such exercise of such Stock Option (determined on the date the Stock Option is canceled) over the aggregate consideration to have been paid by such person upon such exercise. Such payment shall be by check, bank draft or in Stock (or in another form of payment acceptable both to the Committee and the person exercising the option) having a Fair Market Value (determined on the date the payment is to be made) equal to the amount of such payments or any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee. If a Stock Option remains unexercised on the date it would otherwise have expired and if on such date the Fair Market Value of the shares subject to the Stock Option exceeds the aggregate consideration that would have been required to have been paid to purchase such shares had the Stock Option been exercised, the person then holding the Stock Option shall be deemed to have requested, and the Committee shall be deemed to have approved, a cancellation of such Stock Option in accordance with the first sentence of this Section 6(k) and the amount payable pursuant to the first sentence of this Section 6(k) shall be paid in the form of shares of Stock in accordance with the first sentence of this Section 6(k).
     (l) SARs. An SAR is an award entitling the recipient to receive an amount in cash or shares of Stock (or in any other form of payment acceptable to the Committee) or a combination thereof having a value determined by reference to (and not to exceed) the excess of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of exercise over the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant (or over the option exercise price, if the SAR was granted in tandem with a Stock Option). The Committee shall determine all terms of SARs granted under the Plan. SARs may be granted in tandem with, or independently of, any Stock Option granted under the Plan. Any SAR granted in tandem with ISOs shall comply with the ISO rules relating to tandem SARs. The Committee may at any time accelerate the exercisability of all or any portion of any SAR.
SECTION 7.OTHER STOCK-BASED AWARDS.
     (a) Nature of Stock Awards. Awards under this Section 7 include Awards other than Stock Options or SARs that entitle the recipient to acquire for a purchase price (which may be

-7-


zero) shares of Stock subject to restrictions under the Plan (including a right on the part of the Company during a specified period to repurchase such shares at their original purchase price, or to require forfeiture if the purchase price was zero, upon the Participant’s termination of employment) determined by the Committee (“Restricted Stock”); Awards that entitle the recipient, with or without payment, to the future delivery of shares of Stock, subject to such conditions and restrictions as may be determined by the Committee (“Stock Units”); and other Awards under which Stock may be acquired or which are otherwise based on the value of Stock.
     (b) Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant shall have all the rights of a shareholder, including voting and dividend rights, (i) only as to shares of Stock received by the Participant under an Other Stock-based Award, and (ii) in any case, subject to such nontransferability restrictions, Company repurchase or forfeiture rights, and other conditions as are made applicable to the Award.
     (c) Restrictions. The Committee may determine the conditions under which an Other Stock-based Award, or Stock acquired under an Other Stock-based Award, shall be forfeited, and may at any time accelerate, waive or, subject to Section 10, amend any or all of such limitations or conditions. Each Other Stock-based Award shall specify the terms on which such Award or the shares under such Award shall vest (become free of restrictions under the Plan), which may include, without limitation, terms that provide for vesting on a specified date or dates, vesting based on the satisfaction of specified performance conditions, and accelerated vesting in the event of termination of employment under specified circumstances. The Committee shall take such steps as it determines to be appropriate to reflect any restrictions applicable to an Other Stock-based Award or the shares thereunder and to facilitate the recovery by the Company of any such Award or shares that are forfeited.
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, no grants of Full Value Awards, other than grants made in connection with a Participant’s commencement of employment with the Company or any Subsidiary, shall specify a vesting date that is less than three years from the date of grant except as follows: (i) the vesting date may be one year (or a greater period) from the date of grant in the case of a Full Value Award subject to the attainment of performance goals, (ii) Full Value Awards may be granted which specify full vesting in no less than three years and partial vesting at a rate no faster than one-third of such shares each year, (iii) Full Value Awards may provide for accelerated vesting in the event of death, disability, retirement or a Change of Control, and (iv) Full Value Awards may be granted without regard to the foregoing limitations provided that the maximum number of shares subject to such Awards granted after the Adoption Date, when no longer subject to restrictions under the Plan, does not exceed 3,000,000 shares.
     Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, (A) neither any Other Stock-based Award nor any unvested Restricted Stock acquired under an Other Stock-based Award may be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered or disposed of except as specifically provided herein, and (B) in the event of termination of employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason, any shares of Restricted Stock that are not then vested (taking into account any accelerated vesting applicable to such shares under the terms of the Award or otherwise) shall be resold to the Company at their purchase price or forfeited to the Company if the purchase price was zero. The Committee at any time may accelerate the vesting

-8-


date or dates for an Other Stock-based Award or for Restricted Stock, if any, granted thereunder and may otherwise waive or, subject to Section 10, amend any conditions of the Award. Neither the Committee nor the Company shall be liable for any adverse tax or other consequences to a Participant from any such acceleration, waiver, or amendment.
     (d) Dividends; Dividend Equivalents. Except as otherwise determined by the Committee, a Participant’s rights under an Other Stock-based Award to dividends (or dividend equivalent payments, in the case of an Other Stock-based Award, if any, other than Restricted Stock, that is subject to vesting conditions and as to which the Committee has made provision for such payments) shall be treated as unvested so long as such Award remains unvested (the “restricted period”), and any such dividends or dividend equivalent payments that would otherwise have been paid during the restricted period shall instead be accumulated and paid within thirty (30) days following the date on which such Award is determined by the Company to have vested.
     (e) Annual Deferred Stock Awards, Additional Deferred Stock Awards and Dividend Awards for Eligible Directors.
(i)

The TJX Companies, Inc.

  Accounts. The Company shall establish and maintain an Account

INTERNET

http://www.proxyvoting.com/tjx

Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the name of each Eligible Director to which the Annual Deferred Stock Awards, Additional Deferred Stock Awards and Dividend Awards shall be credited.

web site.

  (ii)  Annual Awards. On the date of each Annual Meeting, each Eligible Director who is elected a Director at such Annual Meeting shall automatically and without further action by the Board or Committee be granted an Annual Deferred Stock Award as provided in subsection (iv) and an Additional Deferred Stock Award as provided in subsection (v). On each date other than the date of an Annual Meeting on which an Eligible Director is first elected a Director by the Board, the Eligible Director then so elected shall automatically and without further action by the Board or Committee be granted a prorated Annual Deferred Stock Award as provided in subsection (iv) and a prorated Additional Deferred Stock Award as provided in subsection (v). The grant of each Annual Deferred Stock Award and Additional Deferred Stock Award shall entitle each recipient, automatically and without further action by the Board or the Committee, to Dividend Awards as provided in subsection (vi).

OR

  (iii)  Nature of Awards. Each Annual Deferred Stock Award, Additional Deferred Stock Award and Dividend Award shall be an Other Stock-based Award subject

TELEPHONE

1-866-540-5760

Use any touch-tone telephone to the terms of this Plan and shall constitute an unfunded and unsecured promise of the Company to delivervote your proxy. Have your proxy card in the future to such Eligible Director, without payment, the number of shares of Stock in the amounts and at the times hereinafter provided. The shares of Stock notionally credited to the Accounts of Eligible Directors shall be notional shares only and shall not entitle the Eligible Director to any voting rights, dividend or distribution or other rights except as expressly set forth herein. Nothing herein shall obligate the Company to issue or set aside shares of Stock, in trust or otherwise, to meet its contractual obligations hereunder.

-9-hand when you call.


(iv)Annual Deferred Stock Award. In respect of each Annual Deferred Stock Award granted on the date of an Annual Meeting, the Company shall credit to each Eligible Director’s Account, effective as of the date of such Annual Meeting, the number of notional shares of Stock, including any fractional share, equal to $100,000 or such lesser dollar amount as may be determined by the Board divided by the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of such Annual Meeting. In respect of each Annual Deferred Stock Award granted on a date other than the date of an Annual Meeting, the Company shall credit to the Account of the Eligible Director first elected on such date the number of notional shares of Stock, including any fractional share, equal to (i) $100,000 or such lesser dollar amount as may be determined by the Board divided by the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of such first election multiplied by (ii) the quotient (not greater than one) obtained by dividing (A) the number of days starting with the date of such first election and ending on the day first preceding the anticipated date of the next Annual Meeting, by (B) 365.
  (v)  Additional Deferred Stock Award. In addition

If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.

To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the Annual Deferred Stock Award,enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the Company shall creditnamed proxies to the Account of each Eligible Director, effective as of the date that any Annual Deferred Stock Award is credited to such Account, an Additional Deferred Stock Award covering the same number ofvote your shares as are covered by such Annual Deferred Stock Award determined in the same manner prescribed in subsection (iv) above.as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.

(vi)  Dividend Awards. The Company shall credit (each such credit, a “Dividend Award”) the Account of each Eligible Director on the date of each Annual Meeting and on the date on which an Eligible Director ceases to be a Director if not the date of an Annual Meeting with a number of notional shares of Stock, including any fractional share, equal to (i) plus (ii), divided by (iii), where:

(i)

WO#

22569

  is the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares then allocated to such Eligible Director’s Account (disregarding, for purposes of this clause (i), any shares credited to such Account since the date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting) by the aggregate per-share amount of dividends for which the record date occurred since the date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting;

q FOLD AND DETACH HEREq

(ii)

Please vote, date and sign below and return promptly in the enclosed envelope.

 is the product obtained by multiplying the number of shares first credited to such Eligible Director’s Account since the date of the immediately preceding Annual Meeting but prior to the date of such Dividend Award by the aggregate per-share amount of dividends for which the record date occurred since the date that such shares were credited to such Account; and

-10-

Please mark your votes as

indicated in this example


(iii) is the Fair Market Value of one share of Stock on the date of such Dividend Award.
(vii)Vesting. Each Annual Deferred Stock Award, and any Dividend Awards in respect of Annual Deferred Stock Awards and/or Additional Deferred Stock Awards, shall vest immediately upon grant and be non-forfeitable. Each Additional Deferred Stock Award shall vest and become non-forfeitable on the date immediately preceding the date of the Annual Meeting next succeeding the date of grant of such Award;provided, that the recipient is still a Director on such date. In the event that an Eligible Director terminates his or her service as a Director for any reason prior to such vesting date, the Eligible Director shall forfeit any then unvested Additional Deferred Stock Award.

x

(viii)Delivery. The Company shall deliver to an Eligible Director (or a former Eligible Director) the number of shares of Stock, rounded up to the next full share, represented by notional shares of Stock credited to the Account of such Eligible Director in respect of Annual Deferred Stock Awards (including any Dividend Awards made in respect of such Annual Deferred Stock Awards) at the earlier of the following: (x) immediately prior to a Change of Control or (y) within sixty (60) days following the Eligible Director’s death or earlier separation from service (as determined under the regulations under Section 409A of the Code). With respect to any Additional Deferred Stock Award, absent an election to defer delivery of the shares of Stock subject to such Award pursuant to subsection (ix) below, the Company shall deliver to an Eligible Director the number of shares of Stock, rounded up to the next full share, represented by notional shares of Stock credited to the Account of such Eligible Director in respect of such Additional Deferred Stock Award (including any Dividend Awards made in respect of such Additional Deferred Stock Award) at the earlier of the following: (x) immediately prior to a Change of Control or (y) within sixty (60) days following the date of vesting pursuant to subsection (vii) above. In the event of a termination by reason of death, such shares of Stock shall be delivered to such beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the Eligible Director in writing in such form, and delivered prior to his or her death to such person at the Company, as specified by the Company or, in the absence of such a designation, to the legal representative of Eligible Director’s estate.
(ix)Deferral of Delivery of Additional Deferred Stock Awards. By filing a written notice to the Company in such form, and delivered to such person at the Company, as specified by the Company, an Eligible Director may irrevocably elect to defer receipt of the delivery of shares of Stock representing all or a portion of the notional shares of Stock subject to any Additional Deferred Stock Award (including any Dividend Awards made in respect of such notional shares) until the earlier of the following: (x) immediately prior to a Change of Control or (y) as soon as practicable and in all events within sixty (60) days following the

-11-


Eligible Director’s death or earlier separation from service (as determined under the regulations under Section 409A of the Code). Any election made pursuant to this subsection (ix) must be submitted with respect to any Additional Deferred Stock Award (A) in the case of the Additional Deferred Stock Award granted on the date an Eligible Director is first elected as a Director, no later than 30 days after the date of such Eligible Director’s election to the Board or (B) in the case of any other Additional Deferred Stock Award, no later than December 31 of the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which such Award is granted, or (C) at such other time as is necessary to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, as determined by the Committee.
SECTION 8.PERFORMANCE AWARDS.
     (a) Nature of Performance Awards. A Performance Award is an award entitling the recipient to acquire cash or shares of Stock, or a combination of cash and Stock, upon the attainment of specified performance goals. If the grant, vesting, or exercisability of a Stock Option, SAR, or Other Stock-Based Award is conditioned upon attainment of a specified performance goal or goals, it shall be treated as a Performance Award for purposes of this Section and shall be subject to the provisions of this Section in addition to the provisions of the Plan applicable to such form of Award.
     (b) Qualifying and Nonqualifying Performance Awards. Performance Awards may include Awards intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code (“Qualifying Awards”) and Awards not intended so to qualify (“Nonqualifying Awards”).
     (c) Terms of Performance Awards. The Committee in its sole discretion shall determine the performance goals applicable under each such Award, the periods during which performance is to be measured, and all other limitations and conditions applicable to the Award. Performance Awards may be granted independently or in connection with the granting of other Awards. In the case of a Qualifying Award (other than a Stock Option), the following special rules shall apply: (i) the Committee shall preestablish the performance goals and other material terms of the Award not later than the latest date permitted under Section 162(m) of the Code; (ii) the performance goal or goals fixed by the Committee in connection with the Award shall be based exclusively on one or more Approved Performance Criteria; (iii) no payment (including, for this purpose, vesting or exercisability where vesting or exercisability, rather than the grant of the Award, is linked to satisfaction of performance goals) shall be made unless the preestablished performance goals have been satisfied and the Committee has certified (pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Code) that they have been satisfied; (iv) no payment shall be made in lieu or in substitution for the Award if the preestablished performance goals are not satisfied (but this clause shall not limit the ability of the Committee or the Company to provide other remuneration to the affected Participant, whether or not under the Plan, so long as the payment of such remuneration would not cause the Award to fail to be treated as having been contingent on the preestablished performance goals) and (v) in all other respects the Award shall be construed and administered consistent with the intent that any compensation under the Award be treated as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.

-12-


     (d) Rights as a Shareholder. A Participant shall have all the rights of a shareholder, including voting and dividend rights, (i) only as to shares of Stock received by the Participant under a Performance Award, and (ii) in any case, subject to such nontransferability restrictions, Company repurchase or forfeiture rights, and other conditions as are made applicable to the Award. Notwithstanding the foregoing and for the avoidance of doubt, in the case of any Performance Award that is also an Other Stock-based Award, the limitations of Section 7(d) (providing that rights to dividends and dividend equivalents shall remain unvested until the underlying Stock or rights to Stock are vested) shall apply to any right to dividends or dividend equivalent payments hereunder.
     (e) Termination. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Committee (consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code, in the case of a Qualifying Award), a Participant’s rights in all Performance Awards shall automatically terminate upon the Participant’s termination of employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries for any reason (including death).
     (f) Acceleration, Waiver,etc.. The Committee may in its sole discretion (but subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, in the case of a Qualifying Award) accelerate, waive or, subject to Section 10, amend any or all of the goals, restrictions or conditions imposed under any Performance Award. Neither the Committee nor the Company shall be liable for any adverse tax or other consequences to a Participant from any such acceleration, waiver, or amendment.
SECTION 9.TRANSFER, LEAVE OF ABSENCE.
     For purposes of the Plan, the following events shall not be deemed a termination of employment:
(a)a transfer to the employment of the Company from a Subsidiary or from the Company to a Subsidiary, or from one Subsidiary to another;
(b)an approved leave of absence for military service or sickness, or for any other purpose approved by the Company, but in each case only if the employee’s right to reemployment is guaranteed either by a statute or by contract or under the policy pursuant to which the leave of absence was granted or if the Committee otherwise so provides in writing.
For purposes of the Plan, the employees of a Subsidiary of the Company shall be deemed to have terminated their employment on the date on which such Subsidiary ceases to be a Subsidiary of the Company. Subject to the foregoing, an individual’s employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries shall be considered to have terminated on the last day of his or her actual employment, whether such day is determined by agreement between the Company or a Subsidiary and the individual or unilaterally, and whether such termination is with or without notice, and no period of advance notice, if any, that is or ought to have been given under applicable law in respect of such termination of employment shall be taken into account in determining the individual’s entitlements, if any, under the Plan or any Award.

-13-


     Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of any Award that is subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, “termination of employment” shall mean a separation from service (as determined under the regulations under Section 409A of the Code).
SECTION 10.AMENDMENTS AND TERMINATION.
     The Board or the Committee may at any time amend or discontinue the Plan and the Committee may at any time amend or cancel any outstanding Award for the purpose of satisfying changes in law or for any other lawful purpose, but no such action shall materially adversely affect rights under any outstanding Award without the holder’s consent. However, no such amendment shall be effective unless approved by stockholders if it would (i) reduce the exercise price of any option previously granted hereunder or otherwise constitute a repricing requiring stockholder approval under applicable New York Stock Exchange rules, or (ii) effect a change which, in the determination of the Committee, would jeopardize the qualification of an Award that the Committee has determined is intended to qualify (and to continue to qualify) as an ISO or as exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan, the Board or the Committee may at any time adopt any subplan or otherwise grant Stock Options or other Awards under this Plan having terms consistent with applicable foreign tax or other foreign regulatory requirements or laws.
SECTION 11.STATUS OF PLAN.
     With respect to the portion of any Award which has not been exercised and any payments in cash, stock or other consideration not received by a Participant, a Participant shall have no rights greater than those of a general creditor of the Company unless the Committee shall otherwise expressly determine in connection with any Award or Awards. In its sole discretion, the Committee may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the Company’s obligations to deliver Stock or make payments with respect to awards hereunder, provided that the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the provision of the foregoing sentence.
SECTION 12.CHANGE OF CONTROL PROVISIONS.
     As used herein, a Change of Control and related definitions shall have the meanings set forth in Exhibit A to this Plan.
     Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control:
(i)Each Stock Option shall automatically become fully exercisable unless the Committee shall otherwise expressly provide at the time of grant.
(ii)Restrictions and conditions on Other Stock-based Awards (including without limitation Restricted Stock) and Performance Awards shall automatically be deemed waived unless the Committee shall otherwise expressly provide at the time of grant.

-14-


The Committee may at any time prior to or after a Change of Control accelerate the exercisability of any Stock Options and may waive restrictions, limitations and conditions on Other Stock-based Awards (including without limitation Restricted Stock) and Performance Awards to the extent it shall in its sole discretion determine.
SECTION 13.GENERAL PROVISIONS.
     (a) No Distribution; Compliance with Legal Requirements, etc. The Committee may require each person acquiring shares pursuant to an Award to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such person is acquiring the shares without a view to distribution thereof. No shares of Stock shall be issued pursuant to an Award until all applicable securities law and other legal and stock exchange requirements have been satisfied. The Committee may require the placing of such stop-orders and restrictive legends on certificates for Stock and Awards as it deems appropriate.
     (b) References to Employment. Wherever reference is made herein to “employee,” “employment” (or correlative terms), except in Section 4, the term shall be deemed to include both common law employees and others.
     (c) Other Compensation Arrangements; No Employment Rights. Nothing contained in this Plan shall prevent the Board of Directors from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements, subject to stockholder approval if such approval is required; and such arrangements may be either generally applicable or applicable only in specific cases. The adoption of the Plan does not confer upon any employee any right to continued employment with the Company or a Subsidiary, nor does it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or a Subsidiary to terminate the employment of any of its employees at any time.
     (d) Tax Withholding, etc. Each Participant shall, no later than the date as of which the value of an Award or of any Stock or other amounts received thereunder first becomes includable in the gross income of the Participant for Federal income tax purposes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Committee regarding payment of, any Federal, state, or local taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to such income. The Company and its Subsidiaries shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the Participant. The Company may withhold or otherwise administer the Plan to comply with tax obligations under any applicable foreign laws.
     The Committee may provide, in respect of any transfer of Stock under an Award, that if and to the extent withholding of any Federal, state or local tax is required in respect of such transfer or vesting, the Participant may elect, at such time and in such manner as the Committee shall prescribe, to (i) surrender to the Company Stock not then subject to restrictions under any Company plan or (ii) have the Company hold back from the transfer or vesting Stock having a value calculated to satisfy such withholding obligation. In no event shall Stock be surrendered under clause (i) or held back by the Company under clause (ii) in excess of the minimum amount required to be withheld for Federal, state and local taxes.

-15-


     Except as otherwise expressly provided by the Committee in any case, all Awards under the Plan that are not exempt from the requirements of Section 409A of the Code shall be construed to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code and any discretionary authority of the Committee or the Company with respect to an Award that is intended to be exempt from or in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code shall be exercised in a manner that is consistent with such intent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary, nor any officer, director or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary, nor the Board or the Committee or any member of either, shall be liable to the Participant or any beneficiary of a Participant by reason of any additional tax (whether or not under Section 409A of the Code), including any interest or penalty, resulting from any exercise of discretion or other action or failure to act by any of the Company, any Subsidiary, any such officer, director or employee, or the Board or the Committee, or by reason of the failure of an Award to qualify for an exemption from, or to comply with the requirements of, Section 409A of the Code, or for any cost or expense incurred in connection with any action by any taxing authority related to any of the foregoing.
     (e) Deferral of Awards. Participants may elect to defer receipt of Awards or vesting of Awards only in such cases and to the extent that the Committee shall determine at or after the grant date.
SECTION 14.DEFINITIONS.
     The following terms shall be defined as set forth below:
     (a) “Account” means a bookkeeping account established and maintained under Section 7(e) in the name of each Eligible Director to which Annual Deferred Stock Awards, Additional Deferred Stock Awards, and Dividend Awards are credited hereunder.
     (b) “Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
     (c) “Additional Deferred Stock Award” means an Award granted to an Eligible Director pursuant to Section 7(e)(v).
     (d) “Adoption Date” is defined in Section 1.
     (e) “Annual Deferred Stock Award” means an Award granted to an Eligible Director pursuant to Section 7(e)(iv).
     (f) “Annual Meeting” shall mean the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company.
     (g) “Approved Performance Criteria” means criteria based on any one or more of the following (on a consolidated, divisional, line of business, geographical or area of executive’s responsibilities basis): one or more items of or within (i) sales, revenues, assets or expenses; (ii) earnings, income or margins, before or after deduction for all or any portion of interest, taxes, depreciation, or amortization, whether or not on a

-16-


continuing operations, or aggregate or per share basis; (iii) return on investment, capital, assets, sales or revenues; and (iv) stock price; in each case with such inclusions thereto or exclusions therefrom as the Committee may determine in a manner consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code. In determining whether a performance goal based on one or more Approved Performance Criteria has been satisfied for any period, any extraordinary item, change in generally accepted accounting principles, or change in law (including regulations) that would affect the determination as to whether such performance goal had been achieved will automatically be disregarded or taken into account, whichever would cause such performance goal to be more likely to be achieved, and to the extent consistent with Section 162(m) of the Code the Committee may provide for other objectively determinable and nondiscretionary adjustments; provided, that nothing herein shall be construed as limiting the Committee’s authority to reduce or eliminate a Performance Award (including, without limitation, by restricting vesting under any such Award) that would otherwise be deemed to have been earned.
     (h) “Award” or “Awards” except where referring to a particular category of grant under the Plan shall include Stock Options, SARs, Other Stock-based Awards and Performance Awards.
     (i) “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.
     (j) “Cause” means (i) as to any Participant who at the relevant time is party to an employment, severance, or similar agreement with the Company or a Subsidiary that contains a definition of “cause” (including any similar term used in connection with a for-cause involuntary termination), the definition set forth in such agreement, and (ii) in every other case, a felony conviction of a Participant or the failure of a Participant to contest prosecution for a felony, or a Participant’s willful misconduct or dishonesty, any of which is directly harmful to the business or reputation of the Company or any Subsidiary.
     (k) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any successor Code, and related rules, regulations and interpretations.
     (l) “Committee” means the Committee referred to in Section 2.
     (m) “Company” means The TJX Companies, Inc.
     (n) “Director” means a member of the Board.
     (o) “Disability” means disability as determined in accordance with standards and procedures similar to those used under the Company’s long term disability program.
     (p) “Dividend Award” means an Award granted to an Eligible Director pursuant to Section 7(e)(vi).
     (q) “Eligible Director” means a Director who is not employed (other than as a Director) by the Company or by any Subsidiary.

-17-


     (r) “Fair Market Value” on any given date means the last sale price regular way at which Stock is traded on such date as reflected in the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions Index or, where applicable, the value of a share of Stock as determined by the Committee in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code.
     (s) “Full Value Award” means an Award other than a Stock Option or an SAR.
     (t) “ISO” means a Stock Option intended to be and designated as an “incentive stock option” as defined in the Code.
     (u) “Non-Employee Director” shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 16b-3(b)(3) promulgated under the Act, or any successor definition under the Act.
     (v) “NSO” means any Stock Option that is not an ISO.
     (w) “Normal Retirement” means retirement from active employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries at or after age 65 with at least five years of service for the Company and its Subsidiaries as specified in The TJX Companies, Inc. Retirement Plan.
     (x) “Other Stock-based Award” means an Award of one of the types described in Section 7.
     (y) “Outside Director” means a member of the Board who is treated as an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.
     (z) “Participant” means a participant in the Plan.
     (aa) “Performance Award” means an Award described in Section 8.
     (bb) “Plan” is defined in Section 1.
     (cc) “Restricted Stock” is defined in Section 7(a).
     (dd) “SAR” means an Award described in Section 6(l).
     (ee) “Stock Unit” is defined in Section 7(a).
     (ff) “Share Limit” is defined in Section 3(a).
     (gg) “Special Service Retirement” means retirement from active employment with the Company and its Subsidiaries (i) at or after age 60 with at least twenty years of service for the Company and its Subsidiaries, or (ii) at or after age 65 with at least ten years of service for the Company and its Subsidiaries.
     (hh) “Stock” means the Common Stock, $1.00 par value, of the Company, subject to adjustments pursuant to Section 3.

-18-


     (ii) “Stock Option” means any option to purchase shares of Stock granted pursuant to Section 6.
     (jj) “Subsidiary” means any corporation or other entity (other than the Company) in an unbroken chain beginning with the Company if each of the entities (other than the last entity in the unbroken chain) owns stock or other interests possessing 50% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock or other interest in one of the other corporations or other entities in the chain.

-19-


EXHIBIT A
DEFINITION OF “CHANGE OF CONTROL
     “Change of Control” shall mean the occurrence of any one of the following events:
     (a) there occurs a change of control of the Company of a nature that would be required to be reported in response to Item 5.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K (as amended in 2004) pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or in any other filing under the Exchange Act;provided,however, that if the Participant or a Participant Related Party is the Person or a member of a group constituting the Person acquiring control, a transaction shall not be deemed to be a Change of Control as to a Participant unless the Committee shall otherwise determine prior to such occurrence; or
     (b) any Person other than the Company, any wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, or any employee benefit plan of the Company or such a subsidiary becomes the owner of 20% or more of the Company’s Common Stock and thereafter individuals who were not directors of the Company prior to the date such Person became a 20% owner are elected as directors pursuant to an arrangement or understanding with, or upon the request of or nomination by, such Person and constitute a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors;provided,however, that unless the Committee shall otherwise determine prior to the acquisition of such 20% ownership, such acquisition of ownership shall not constitute a Change of Control as to a Participant if the Participant or a Participant Related Party is the Person or a member of a group constituting the Person acquiring such ownership; or
     (c) there occurs any solicitation or series of solicitations of proxies by or on behalf of any Person other than the Company’s Board of Directors and thereafter individuals who were not directors of the Company prior to the commencement of such solicitation or series of solicitations are elected as directors pursuant to an arrangement or understanding with, or upon the request of or nomination by, such Person and constitute a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors; or
     (d) the Company executes an agreement of acquisition, merger or consolidation which contemplates that (i) after the effective date provided for in such agreement, all or substantially all of the business and/or assets of the Company shall be owned, leased or otherwise controlled by another Person and (ii) individuals who are directors of the Company when such agreement is executed shall not constitute a majority of the board of directors of the survivor or successor entity immediately after the effective date provided for in such agreement;provided,however, that unless otherwise determined by the Committee, no transaction shall constitute a Change of Control as to a Participant if, immediately after such transaction, the Participant or any Participant Related Party shall own equity securities of any surviving corporation (“Surviving Entity”) having a fair value as a percentage of the fair value of the equity securities of such Surviving Entity

-20-


greater than 125% of the fair value of the equity securities of the Company owned by the Participant and any Participant Related Party immediately prior to such transaction, expressed as a percentage of the fair value of all equity securities of the Company immediately prior to such transaction (for purposes of this paragraph ownership of equity securities shall be determined in the same manner as ownership of Common Stock); andprovided,further, that, for purposes of this paragraph (d), if such agreement requires as a condition precedent approval by the Company’s shareholders of the agreement or transaction, a Change of Control shall not be deemed to have taken place unless and until the acquisition, merger, or consolidation contemplated by such agreement is consummated (but immediately prior to the consummation of such acquisition, merger, or consolidation, a Change of Control shall be deemed to have occurred on the date of execution of such agreement).
     In addition, for purposes of this Exhibit A the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
     “Common Stock” shall mean the then outstanding Common Stock of the Company plus, for purposes of determining the stock ownership of any Person, the number of unissued shares of Common Stock which such Person has the right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options or otherwise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term Common Stock shall not include shares of Preferred Stock or convertible debt or options or warrants to acquire shares of Common Stock (including any shares of Common Stock issued or issuable upon the conversion or exercise thereof) to the extent that the Board of Directors of the Company shall expressly so determine in any future transaction or transactions.
     A Person shall be deemed to be the “owner” of any Common Stock:
     (i) of which such Person would be the “beneficial owner,” as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) under the Exchange Act, as in effect on March 1, 1989; or
     (ii) of which such Person would be the “beneficial owner” for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules of the Commission promulgated thereunder, as in effect on March 1, 1989; or
     (iii) which such Person or any of its affiliates or associates (as such terms are defined in Rule 12b-2 promulgated by the Commission under the Exchange Act, as in effect on March 1, 1989) has the right to acquire (whether such right is exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time) pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, warrants or options or otherwise.
     “Person” shall have the meaning used in Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, as in effect on March 1, 1989.

-21-


     A “Participant Related Party” shall mean, with respect to a Participant, any affiliate or associate of the Participant other than the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company. The terms “affiliate” and “associate” shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act (the term “registrant” in the definition of “associate” meaning, in this case, the Company).
     Notwithstanding the foregoing, in any case where the occurrence of a Change of Control could affect the vesting of or payment under an Award subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, the term “Change of Control” shall mean an occurrence that both (i) satisfies the requirements set forth above in this Exhibit A, and (ii) is a “change in control event” as that term is defined in the regulations under Section 409A of the Code.

-22-


Please Vote, Date and Sign Below and Return Promptly in the Enclosed Envelope.
Please mark
your votes as
indicated in
this example
x
FOR allWITHHOLD
nomineesAUTHORITY to vote
The Board of Directors recommends alisted belowfor all nomineesEXCEPTIONS*
vote FOR the Election of Directors.listed belowfollowing Director nominees in Proposal 1.  

1. Election of Directors

     
1. Election of Directors c c c
 Nominees:   
Nominees: 

  FOR  

 

AGAINST

 (01) José B. Alvarez

ABSTAIN

 (05) David T. Ching     (09) John F. O’Brien
 (02) Alan M. Bennett

  FOR  

 (06)

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

1.1 Zein Abdalla

¨¨¨1.6 Michael F. Hines (10) Robert F. Shapiro
¨ (03) David A. Brandon¨ (07) Amy B. Lane     (11) Willow B. Shire
¨ (04) Bernard Cammarata(08) Carol Meyrowitz     (12) Fletcher H. Wiley

(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “Exceptions” box and write that nominee’s name in the space provided below.)
*Exceptions

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2.

 FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
1.2 José B. Alvarez¨¨¨1.7 Amy B. Lane¨¨¨

2.

Ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting firm.¨¨¨
1.3 Alan M. Bennett¨¨¨1.8 Carol Meyrowitz¨¨¨The Board of Directors recommends avote FOR Proposal 3.   FOR   AGAINST ABSTAIN
1.4 Bernard Cammarata ¨
2.¨¨1.9 John F. O’Brien¨¨¨3. Approval of amendments to and performancematerial terms of the Stock Incentive Plan.executive officer performance goals under cash incentive plans. c¨    c¨ c¨
1.5 David T. Ching ¨ ¨ ¨ 

1.10 Willow B. Shire

¨¨¨The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR Proposal 3.4. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
4.Advisory approval of TJX’s executive compensation.¨¨¨

   
   
3.    Ratification of appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
 cMark Here for    c¨
 cAddress Change
     

      or Comments 
    
       
SEE REVERSE 


Mark Here for Address
Change or Comments
SEE REVERSE
c
Signature Signature Date 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) on the books of the Company. Joint owners should each sign personally. Trustees and other fiduciaries should indicate the capacity in which they sign, and when more than one name appears, a majority must sign. If a corporation, this signature should be that of an authorized officer who should state his or her title.

Signature

Signature

Date


You can access your

5  FOLD AND DETACH HERE  5
 
WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,
BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK.
Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to annual meeting day.

The TJX Companies, Inc.account online.

Access your The TJX Companies, Inc. account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).

The transfer agent for The TJX Companies, Inc. makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your shareholder account.

• View account status• View payment history for dividends
• View certificate history• Make address changes
• View book-entry information• Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax form

Visit us on the web at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess

For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm

Monday-Friday Eastern Time

For all other inquiries call

Investor ServiceDirect®

Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week

TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-866-606-8365

THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy card. Your vote counts and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.

Please vote on the Internet or by telephone or by mail prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 13, 2012.

Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters.

ChooseMLinkSMfor fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on toInvestor ServiceDirect®atwww.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of StockholdersStockholders.

You can view the Annual Report and Proxy Statement on the Internet at:
http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/tjx

INTERNET
http://www.eproxy.com/tjx
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site.
OR
TELEPHONE
1-866-580-9477
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card in hand when you call.
If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card.



49678

q FOLD AND DETACH HEREq


THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS JUNE 2, 2009

13, 2012

The stockholder(s) whose signature(s) appear(s) on the reverse side of this Proxy Card hereby appoint(s) CAROL MEYROWITZ, JEFFREY G. NAYLORSCOTT GOLDENBERG and MARY B. REYNOLDS, or any of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies, to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of The TJX Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held at the Company’s corporate office, 770 Cochituate Road, Framingham, Massachusetts on Tuesday,Wednesday, June 2, 200913, 2012 at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, all the shares of Common Stock of the Company which the stockholder(s) could vote, if present, as directed on the reverse of this card and in such manner as the proxies may determine on any other matters which may properly come before the meeting and to vote as specified on the reverse.

meeting.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN.IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALLTHE DIRECTOR NOMINEES, FOR PROPOSAL 2, FOR PROPOSAL 3 AND FOR PROPOSAL 3.4.THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENT.ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT.THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the Electionelection of Directors,the Director nominees, FOR Proposal 2, FOR Proposal 3 and FOR Proposal 3.

4.

Address Change/Comments

(Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)

SHAREOWNER SERVICES

P.O. BOX 3550

SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250

(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

BNY MELLON SHAREOWNER SERVICES
P.O. BOX 3550
SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250
Address Change/Comments
(Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)






5FOLD AND DETACH HERE5
You can now access your The TJX Companies, Inc. account online.
Access your The TJX Companies, Inc. shareholder account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD).
The transfer agent for The TJX Companies, Inc. now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your shareholder account.
View account statusView payment history for dividends
View certificate historyMake address changes
View book-entry informationObtain a duplicate 1099 tax form
Establish/change your PIN
Visit us on the web at http://www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm
Monday-Friday Eastern Time
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC.
Please take note of the important information enclosed with this proxy card. Your vote counts and you are strongly encouraged to exercise your right to vote your shares.
Please vote on the Internet or by telephone or by mail prior to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2, 2009.
Thank you in advance for your prompt consideration of these matters.

ChooseMLinkSM for fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on toInvestor ServiceDirect® atwww.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.
49678